Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 642 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Over 100 staffers investigated, but not the justices...? (Original Post)
pbmus
Jan 2023
OP
Alito's Pelican Brief bullshit is tiresome. Religious zealot says what...fuck off Sammy.
Comfortably_Numb
Jan 2023
#4
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)1. That narrows it down to nine doesn't it?
And even Inspector Clouseau could narrow it down to two.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)3. LMAO....😂🤣😅🤣😂😅😂😂😂
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,031 posts)2. Nothin' sus about THAT!
Comfortably_Numb
(3,811 posts)4. Alito's Pelican Brief bullshit is tiresome. Religious zealot says what...fuck off Sammy.
gab13by13
(21,382 posts)5. Fantastic opening segment today on Nicolle Wallace.
Frank Figliusi made a mockery of the investigation and commented that there are justices who know who the leaker is.
Some poor young SC reporter went through everything that was done doing the investigation and then Nicolle and Figliusi tore her report to shreds. The SC doesn't want us to know who the leaker is, they want to move on.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)6. For Christsake. It was Alito and the Thomas's
There. I saved Roberts some time.
PufPuf23
(8,813 posts)7. Frigging obvious. Alito and Thomas don't want anyone to know
because they are smug asshats that don't want anyone to know because in a sane world and country the deliberate leak would be grounds to remove them from the USSC. IMO the leak is a manipulative conspiracy probably not limited to Alito and Thomas among the USSC Justices.
Hekate
(90,769 posts)8. The "stench of political hackery" gets you a 25% approval rating, as Sotomayor tried to warn them