General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion for legal experts about free speech
Update: Thanks to DUers Kaleva (#3, #21) & sir pball (#16, #17) in this thread, I need to correct my initial statement which was:
Why doesn't it exclude the right to yell "there's no fire here" when there clearly is one -- case in point:
DeSantis declaring that the Covid-19 booster makes you more likely to get infected.
Seems to me it should be illegal especially for a government official to make such a dangerously false statement.
So...any legal experts here to weigh in?
Here is the case that they referred to: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/
Many thanks for setting me straight on this issue.
Shermann
(7,423 posts)Yelling "fire" in a movie theater causes a panic. Inciting a riot causes...well...a riot. These actions can rise to the level of being criminal.
DeSantis tricked people into making poor life decisions. So, it may not get there.
diva77
(7,643 posts)...seems as serious as inciting a riot.
Thanks for your answer -- it gave me a lot to think about!
Shermann
(7,423 posts)You'd have to prove "willful ignorance" to get to a criminal act, which is tough.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)It ranks right up there with Jenny McCarthy broadcasting that childhood immunizations caused Autism. Would that also be illegal? Clearly not.
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)Brandenburg v. Ohio settled that
marybourg
(12,633 posts)someone dies and you knew there was no fire?
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)You might suffer civil penalties for the results but yelling fire in a theater is protected speech
diva77
(7,643 posts)It seems the original decision was that you don't have the right to yell "fire," and an appeals court agreed, but then it was overturned by the Supreme court? (I got lost in the appeals and overturning history of the decision) -- any clarification much appreciated! Thanks...
sl8
(13,787 posts)It was dicta (a non-binding comment), written by J Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in a case before the Supreme Court, Schenck v United_States.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States
sir pball
(4,743 posts)
your speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action, and is likely to incite or produce such action".
That's the current bar for speech to be regulated in America, and it's higher than the 8 foot 1/4 inch high jump record bar that sits over the entry gate to the Olympic museum in Lausanne (it's REALLY high).
I wonder why people keep saying one cannot yell fire in a crowded theater as an example of limits on free speech.
You should post an OP debunking that.
diva77
(7,643 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)A lot of people would be in trouble
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)Where people said this was no worse then the flu, that masks didn't work and so on.
Dr. Strange
(25,921 posts)The problem/issue is that it's always easy to say retrospectively that you said what you said based on incomplete facts. So it becomes difficult to prosecute people for lying about something that doesn't involve complete and total objective facts.
MichMan
(11,938 posts)Clearly that wasn't true
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)MichMan
(11,938 posts)Kaleva
(36,309 posts)Like the use of condoms does not eliminate the chance of getting AIDs. It just reduces it. Or wearing a seat belt reduces the chances of being killed in a car accident
Edit: ,I haven't seen any posts where it was claimed that vaccines will prevent someone from getting COVID-19 but you have and that info is wrong.
MichMan
(11,938 posts)It was said in the summer of 2021 by a high ranking elected government official "Youre not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations,"
Biden did say that, but in the same speech, he also said that you'd be less likely to get sick, go to the ICU, etc..
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-if-vaccinated-wont-get-covid/
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)All the other times he said one is less likely to get infected
That's entirely different then someone who repeatedly claims over a course of time that one won't get infected if they get vaccinated.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)it would make you less likely to die from it. I was never under the impression that it would prevent anything.
old as dirt
(1,972 posts)...distributing leaflets in opposition to a military draft.
See Schenck v. United States (1919):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States
Kaleva
(36,309 posts)Elessar Zappa
(14,004 posts)GreenWave
(6,759 posts)And your right to ask Death Sentence about his white go go boots and was he in drag and forget to take them off?
Kennah
(14,276 posts)That is the standard laid down in Brandenburg
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/395/444
48656c6c6f20
(7,638 posts)It used to work in America until apathy and corruption stopped keeping it in check. Anything without limits is probably a bad thing. But this is the shit hole we live in now. I fully expect yelling fire in a theatre will now be accepted free speech.