Clinton vs Christie in 2016.

[doc03]

So far Clinton 57% Christie 43% On right side near bottom.
http://www.yahoo.com/

[msongs]

1. hillary will not happen. the optics will be against her nt

[NYC_SKP]

3. WND is already pimping the meme that hillary will run.

So I'm suspect whenever I read anything suggesting it.

I'm for Elizabeth Warren, 2016.

[BlueMan Votes]

4. especially if Liz finds a Harding to be her running mate.

but not tonya.

Warren/Harding 2016.

[Fawke Em]

19. We're not as scary as someone who thinks Hillary Clinton

equals Castro or Chavez.

Hillary is a center-left Democrat. She is not a socialist. Want proof? Ask any real socialist if Clinton OR Obama are socialists. They'll laugh in your face.

[Zorra]

25. Pizza delivery for jd455

[BlueMan Votes]

2. hillary will be too old in 2016.

i'd like to see Obama put her on the Supreme Court, instead.

[doc03]

6. That would be great but her age would be a problem there too n/t

[Thrill]

7. If you think she would be too old for President

why on earth would you want her on the Supreme Court? The Next supreme court nominee should be someone in their 40s

[BlueMan Votes]

15. I don't think that she'd be too old to be president...

i think that she'd be too old to run for president.

[krawhitham]

18. It is not like she will die any time soon, people just will not vote for a old president

[NYC_SKP]

5. That, my friend, is the MSM already trying to shape our opinions.

I read that article, even clicked past the vote to "view more candidates".

They are trying to build the narrative that is rightly ours.

Don't help them.

[defacto7]

10. Thank you

Good point.

[LisaL]

8. Hillary won't run.

We will need to find someone else.

[Angry Dragon]

9. Why wait let's have the election tomorrow why wait

You got the work all done?? Haven't you had enough elections for awhile??
There is a lot of work to be done. If we do it right 2014 and 2016 will take care of themselves.
Christie will be dead by then. Too heavy. Hilary will be tired by then.
I just do not understand why you have to worry about four years from now when there is much to do.

[demhottie]

11. Cuomo v Christie

[joshcryer]

12. It'll probably be Gillibrand vs Christie.

I don't see Hillary running. If she does she'd probably get the nomination fairly easily.

[Tumbulu]

13. Nope Hillary and Michelle vs Christie

He does not stand a chance!

[BlueMan Votes]

21. and michelle's qualifications are...what, exactly?

[Tumbulu]

28. and Mitt's? Vulture capitalist who never paid any taxes?

confirmed liar and bully?

And W's? And Palin's?

Michelle stands about 10 feet taller than all of them put together.

I'm sure you can google her academic accomplishments.

[BlueMan Votes]

31. mitt didn't win either. nor did palin.

just because the other side likes to run unqualified vanity candidates- it doesn't mean that we should.

[Tumbulu]

38. Sorry she is not even a candidate- it is my lovely little wish

and you are raining on my happy parade. She damn well is qualified to do anything she wants. Now why SHE would want to be VP and be stuck doing all the work 24/7 I'm sure she'd say no emphatically. But good grief, can't a DU poster have any fun?

[bayareamike]

14. Warren/O'Malley?

I like the sound of that...

[Marie Marie]

16. I'm still pulling for the Female ticket of Obama/Biden.

Yup, Michelle and Jill: 2016!! I know, I know, in my dreams.

[Tumbulu]

27. That is also a good one, although I am wishing for Hillary and Michelle

it is fun to imagine!

[dchill]

33. Don't forget Patty Murray!

[longship]

20. Jesus Christ! Do we really have to be in perpetual campaign mode?

Give it a rest. No matter what people think, the candidates four years hence will not be the ones trotted out here on DU today.

The UK does national elections on a six week schedule. Many other countries do the same. It is totally insane to put our country into a perpetual campaign mode. That's why congress has a low double digit approval rate.

Give it a rest. Anybody who really cares about this country doesn't give a tinker's cuss about who will be running for president four years from now. We will know that in three years, or so.

But one thing is sure. It will not likely be the top candidates today.

Give this shit a rest. We have work to do, no part of which is electing our next president. Maybe we ought to be more worried about taking back the House of Representatives. Just maybe. That is two years from now.

It is all about perspective, and about tiring our short sighted, ignorant electorate. Let this 2016 meme go. It is irrelevant now.

[BlueMan Votes]

23. What about Tim Kaine?

just because the 'age of the white guy' is over in the U.S., it doesn't mean that we can't run one.

[longship]

24. I don't give a shit about who may run in 2016!

It is totally irrelevant.

I will start worrying in about three years. Ask me then. (and I will likely not have made up my mind.)

Sheesh!

[BlueMan Votes]

26. how about 2014, then...?

do you think that we'll be able to hold/extend the lead in the senate...? and maybe even win back the house...?

[longship]

29. 2014 is what it's all about right now.

The whole shape of things political in 2016 depends entirely on what happens in 2014.

We need to take back the House of Representatives. That will give President Obama the mandate he deserves, because nobody thinks that today's House will do anything different than the last two years. No matter what Boehner said today!

After the 2014 midterms we can begin... begin thinking about 2016. To do so before then is mere political masterbation. In other words, a useless exercise and an utter waste of energy.

[BlueMan Votes]

34. Obama needs to stand a little tougher against the gop house.

rather than selling out our ideals, he should take every opportunity to highlight the intransigent nature of the pukes- and hopefully the voters will give him the congress we need in 2014

[Poll_Blind]

22. Clinton in 2016 is fantasy football. nt

PB

[BlueStater]

30. Did anyone think Barack Obama would be the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee on November 8, 2004?

Certainly not myself, at the very least.

Fuck the media and their obsession with shoving certain candidates down the public's throats. It could be someone totally unexpected on both sides.

[dchill]

32. Hey, I'm ready for that battle!

[bluestate10]

35. If Christie gets the republican party nomination, he will be so damaged that Clinton would kill him.

The bad news for republicans is the party has become a collection of closed minded haters or religious zealots that don't tolerate sane thinking.

[ready2go83]

36. Geezus

Sick of this Hillary running talk. She already ran and lost. She's old, need new blood. Perhaps Julian Castro?

[Le Taz Hot]

37. Would you people

PLEASE stop shoving Hillary Clinton down our throats? We rejected her once already. Her time has passed. We need new blood.