General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's now legal for domestic abusers to own a gun in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi
VoxUnder Judge Cory Wilsons opinion in United States v. Rahimi, people with a history of violent abuse of their romantic partners or the partners children now have a Second Amendment right to own a gun, even if a court has determined that they are a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child.
The immediate impact of this decision is that Zackey Rahimi, who was subject to an agreed civil protective order entered February 5, 2020, by a Texas state court after Rahimis alleged assault of his ex-girlfriend, may not be convicted of violating the federal ban on gun possession by domestic abusers.
More broadly, because the decision was handed down by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which presides over federal lawsuits in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, this federal law can no longer be enforced in those three states.
One of the most alarming things about Rahimi, moreover, is that it is far from clear that this decision is wrong at least under a new precedent the Supreme Court handed down last year drastically expanding the Second Amendment.
Link to tweet
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
MarineCombatEngineer This message was self-deleted by its author.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,393 posts)I guess I should have read it further.
Thanks for the info.
This will not turn out very badly when abusers kill their abusees.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)#1 cause of death to children in the US is guns.
Wounded Bear
(58,662 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)The numbers of women using guns on their husbands and boyfriends just keeps increasing.
Doesn't excuse men in the least.
But it won't be until a woman does a mass shooting of her family or such, that lawmakers MIGHT do something.
markie
(22,756 posts)I have stories... this is so wrong
AndyS
(14,559 posts)and concluded that no law not in effect in 1789 when the 2nd amendment was ratified is constitutional. So, because there were no Domestic Abuse laws in 1789 the ones we have now are invalid.
Another court in Texas ruled that serial numbers on guns are also unconstitutional because there were no serial numbers in 1789.
How long before we apply that logic to other laws passed since 1789?