Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who would you like to see as the president's next Supreme Court nominee? (Original Post) napkinz Nov 2012 OP
Eliot Spitzer n/t lapislzi Nov 2012 #1
+1 (nt) Autumn Colors Nov 2012 #3
Near zero chance of happening/being confirmed. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #9
I agree that it'll never really happen, just wish it could (nt) Autumn Colors Nov 2012 #16
Unless Reid changes filibuster rules, right? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #21
Hillary and the Big Dog. That would drive the GOP insane. JoePhilly Nov 2012 #2
If Elizabeth Warren had lost, I would have picked her napkinz Nov 2012 #6
Yes to this - Hadn't thought about Bill GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #11
In Dreams: Clinton/Warren potus 2016 fredamae Nov 2012 #19
the u.s. would not elect an all female ticket... BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #26
Sady-I agree..It was "In Dreams" :) n/t fredamae Nov 2012 #41
Really? napkinz Nov 2012 #42
really. BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #48
I second Bill Clinton. trof Nov 2012 #23
That is who I first thought of also. However we need to remember we want these appointees to jwirr Nov 2012 #50
Very true ... I wonder if Chelsea would be available for a life time appointment? JoePhilly Nov 2012 #53
How about a non-Right Winger, non-Libertarian? BootinUp Nov 2012 #4
Judge Judy. Tutonic Nov 2012 #5
well then, if he gets a second opening, it would have to be napkinz Nov 2012 #8
Yep. Jerry Springer is an attorney, too! eom BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #13
Elliot Spitzer or Russ Feingold Myrina Nov 2012 #7
Oh yeah! Russ Feingold! ananda Nov 2012 #12
NOT RUSS. TheMightyFavog Nov 2012 #30
I'd love for that to happen, however ... Myrina Nov 2012 #59
Harold Koh or Goodwin Liu jerseygal Nov 2012 #10
Second. Both would be excellent choices. hifiguy Nov 2012 #38
Sheldon Whitehouse. nt Tennessee Gal Nov 2012 #14
Bill C. sinkingfeeling Nov 2012 #15
CA's Attorney General, Kamala Harris. BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #17
Good choice, but I also think the charismatic lady is California's next Governor if she wants it aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2012 #24
She would be perfect to replace the not-so-liberal-anymore Jerry Brown. BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #36
Looks good to me. Otherwise Hillary. WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #25
I LOVE Hillary, but fact of the matter is, she's already up there in age. BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #37
Ah, right. I'm for a young African-American female... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Nov 2012 #44
+1 DonRedwood Nov 2012 #62
Besides, it's about time Thomas gets an African American that will Hutzpa Nov 2012 #64
Ms. Harris has an unmistakeable "Future Governor of CA" hifiguy Nov 2012 #56
If tapped by the president BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #60
Michael Moore. He has as good a grip on the concept of "justice" as anyone. Scuba Nov 2012 #18
Jennifer Granholm MinM Nov 2012 #20
She could be there for a long time too. Ganja Ninja Nov 2012 #28
I don't know JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #22
That would be a wonderful idea! BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #39
This is probably rotten JustAnotherGen Nov 2012 #57
Hillary. BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #27
Kamala Harris or someone like her Progressive dog Nov 2012 #29
Rachel Maddow or Melissa Harris-Perry agentS Nov 2012 #31
Diane Wood. nt LaydeeBug Nov 2012 #32
^^ This one OmahaBlueDog Nov 2012 #47
William K. Black, the bank fraud expert. Waiting For Everyman Nov 2012 #33
Someone under 50 years of age pscot Nov 2012 #34
Not necessarily. hifiguy Nov 2012 #40
Someone we have yet to hear from Marrah_G Nov 2012 #35
+1 hughee99 Nov 2012 #45
Whoever Obama picks quinnox Nov 2012 #43
not sure if you were snarking... Whisp Nov 2012 #52
Someone who didn't attend Harvard/Yale/Columbia Retrograde Nov 2012 #46
Goodwin Liu. calimary Nov 2012 #49
+1. That's the guy. nt bemildred Nov 2012 #63
Well, I'm - ahem - available! Bake Nov 2012 #51
Too bad John Rawls is dead. white_wolf Nov 2012 #54
Leah Ward Sears. retread Nov 2012 #55
Gary Hart librechik Nov 2012 #58
kick napkinz Nov 2012 #61
i need to do more research into this Hutzpa Nov 2012 #65

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
6. If Elizabeth Warren had lost, I would have picked her
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:54 AM
Nov 2012

I'm glad she won her senate seat.

But I was thinking, Bill Clinton as my second choice.

(Wouldn't that be something ... if in 2016 we had Hillary as president and Bill on the Supreme Court.)



GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
11. Yes to this - Hadn't thought about Bill
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:03 AM
Nov 2012

Definitely thought about Hilary though. Though the problem of having a family on the court could raise some issues.

And I think Hilary would be the better choice. Appoint Bill to be the "Explainer in Chief".

 

BlueMan Votes

(903 posts)
26. the u.s. would not elect an all female ticket...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:28 AM
Nov 2012

especially when one is as old as hillary will be in 2016.

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
42. Really?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:02 PM
Nov 2012

First, why do you think America is not ready for an all female ticket?

Second, I think Reagan was 70 when he won in 1980. Hillary would be 69 in 2016. And women live longer.


 

BlueMan Votes

(903 posts)
48. really.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:46 PM
Nov 2012

it's not necessarily about an exact age- unfortunately, in the u.s. it's more about appearance, and Hillary is already looking fairly haggard.

as to why that is... i don't know why so many would have voted for rmoney , either- but the answer is probably the same for both of them.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
50. That is who I first thought of also. However we need to remember we want these appointees to
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:49 PM
Nov 2012

live forever.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
53. Very true ... I wonder if Chelsea would be available for a life time appointment?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:29 PM
Nov 2012

THAT would cause RW heads to explode for sure.

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
59. I'd love for that to happen, however ...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:28 PM
Nov 2012

... I think until his pet project of Campaign Finance Reform is firmly back in charge & Citizens United is gone, dear Mr. Feingold doesn't want to play the campaigning/fundraising game.

Let's get him on SCOTUS where he can help make things right!!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
17. CA's Attorney General, Kamala Harris.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:13 AM
Nov 2012

Young. Female. African-American/Asian American. Super smart. A staunch consumer advocate.

She would be PERFECT as U.S. Supreme Court Justice.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
24. Good choice, but I also think the charismatic lady is California's next Governor if she wants it
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:23 AM
Nov 2012

She would probably make a good politician with her people skills. But she's young and that's important in a Justice.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
36. She would be perfect to replace the not-so-liberal-anymore Jerry Brown.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:48 PM
Nov 2012

Case in point: AG Harris had worked tirelessly to get CA the most amount of dollars in the mortgage settlement, but had to watch as Gov. Brown used the $415+ billion to plug the budget deficit hole instead - very much to her angry disagreement.

Currently, according to Stephanie Miller, the Republicans have lost seats in our legislature and come January they will be completely powerless. They won't be able to filibuster bills like OneCare (medicare for all, California style) or block the effort to finally tax oil companies that are extracting CA oil from CA coasts and lands (we're the only oil state that doesn't assess taxes on oil companies, and its costing us $7 billion a year in revenue!), and stop giving tax breaks to corporations that are here but send their jobs outside of our borders. I'm watching closely if he'll make any move toward those very progressive, pro-CA policies.

Currently, all I see Brown doing is tax CA residents more and more. That's why I voted against Prop 30 that would raise taxes on Californians to fund schools. Why do we Californians, who are already so overtaxed, have to pay more out of our pay check while he could easily get the revenue he needs for schools by working toward policies addressing the above?

Still, I would love to see her as SCOTUS justice because she's only 48 (2 years younger than I) and she could serve for a long, long time, countering Roberts' and the Cons' influence.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
37. I LOVE Hillary, but fact of the matter is, she's already up there in age.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:50 PM
Nov 2012

We need a younger justice to remain LONG after we get rid of Scalia and Kennedy in order to stop the Con agenda from being automatically stamped for approval by this ultra-conservative court.

 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
44. Ah, right. I'm for a young African-American female...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:09 PM
Nov 2012

...I'm sure there are several out there that I've never heard of.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
64. Besides, it's about time Thomas gets an African American that will
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 01:08 PM
Nov 2012

challenge his skewered views. Someone to go head on with him on issues pertaining to African Americans.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
60. If tapped by the president
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:49 PM
Nov 2012

to put herself forward as an U.S. Supreme Court Justice with a lifetime position, or be governor of CA with term limits, I believe she'll go for the lifetime position where she can wield REAL power.

MinM

(2,650 posts)
20. Jennifer Granholm
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:20 AM
Nov 2012

It'll never happen now that she's such a partisan presence (even though she was a moderate as Michigan's Gov). She was a very good attorney general.

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
28. She could be there for a long time too.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:30 AM
Nov 2012

A great choice.

A lot of people say 'No way too partisan" but the GOP will say that no matter who they nominate.

JustAnotherGen

(31,827 posts)
22. I don't know
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:22 AM
Nov 2012

But I hope sometime after 2017 we have a Constitutional Law Professor who has served as Commander in Chief in in that role . . . He's going to be a VERY young man in terms of SCOTUS tenure when he leaves office.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
39. That would be a wonderful idea!
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:55 PM
Nov 2012

But then again, his powerful campaign strategy could be put to use getting more Democratic presidents, senators, and Representatives elected in the coming years because I'm pretty darn sure now that he's won re-election, Kennedy and Scalia are going to sit tight in their seats until a Republican president is in the WH even though they're already "up there" (both are 76 years old).

Look what Rehnquist did. He had to croak in order to get off his bench as he struggled with his health while waiting for a Con in the WH to replace him. Lucky for him (not so much for the country), the GOP stole both elections to facilitate that with Duhbya Bush.

JustAnotherGen

(31,827 posts)
57. This is probably rotten
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:21 PM
Nov 2012

But what's the average life span of a white American male? Especially when their heart was bitter and dark from the day they were born?

Ooops! No filter! I did it again!

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
29. Kamala Harris or someone like her
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:32 AM
Nov 2012

Young is important on the court where appointments are for life. Female is important to give gender balance to the court.

agentS

(1,325 posts)
31. Rachel Maddow or Melissa Harris-Perry
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:36 AM
Nov 2012

That's whom I would LIKE to see. Hey, a guy can dream, right?

Failing that, maybe we could promote someone from the 9th Circuit. They tend to make good decisions.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
47. ^^ This one
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:22 PM
Nov 2012

Two reasons:

1) She's in the same basic age range as Kagan and Sotomayor, and was a Cliton appointee.
2) She's NOT an ivy league grad -- it's time for some non-ILers to get onto the court.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
33. William K. Black, the bank fraud expert.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:43 AM
Nov 2012

He's 61 (i.e., young enough) and good at coming down on corruption. We need that.

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
35. Someone we have yet to hear from
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:26 PM
Nov 2012

Someone who has excelled in the field of law and is admired by their peers for their wisdom.

That is who I want to see.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
45. +1
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:11 PM
Nov 2012

I don't think the SC appointments should be given to career politicians, and certainly don't want a justice being seated with an agenda and/or axe to grind.

Several people have mentioned Bill and Hillary. I don't think either would stand a chance getting Senate confirmation.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
43. Whoever Obama picks
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:06 PM
Nov 2012

I trust my president. I wouldn't presume to offer a choice.

Sorry, there is usually at least one of these kinds of replies in threads like this, so wanted to get it out of the way.

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
46. Someone who didn't attend Harvard/Yale/Columbia
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:17 PM
Nov 2012

A little more variety in educational backgrounds would be nice - I hear U. of Chicago used to have a decent constitutional law teacher Someone who practices west of the Hudson would be nice as well. Kamala Harris would be an interesting choice, but as she comes from liberal San Francisco it would be a hard confirmation hearing.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
51. Well, I'm - ahem - available!
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 02:27 PM
Nov 2012

And I didn't go to an Ivy League law school ... but I'm smart, tough, and I'd be damn good! And Mrs. Bake says I'm brilliant.

Just sayin' ... I could send the Prez a resume ...



Bake

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
65. i need to do more research into this
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 01:12 PM
Nov 2012

last time i wanted Diane Woods, but got Sotomayor which is not a bad choice either. Will be looking for more names to throw into the hat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who would you like to see...