General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums*WHY* do we allow prisoners to count as constituents if they can't vote and can't choose to be there
This artificially inflates the GOP's numbers because the prisons are largely in GOP districts.
This is wrong, and it makes the GOP think it has more clout than it does.
It makes me feel "tin foil hatty" for things like "mandatory minimum sentences" and shit.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)You don't need to have a tin foil hat to see the conflicts inherent in the prison industry complex though.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)In order for this to be even close to fair, there'd have to be a prison in every congressional district with prportional representation.
caveat_imperator
(193 posts)But instead today's prisoners are counted as a whole person of 2/3rds of one.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)and it inflates the GOP's numbers.
onenote
(42,714 posts)I suppose it makes sense insofar as most prisons are in rural areas, but does anyone have any actual statistics on this?
onenote
(42,714 posts)There are over 2 million adults incarcerated in the US, but the largest correectional facilities in the country have between 3000 and 5000 prisoners. Most jails and prisons are much smaller. The average Congressional District has between 500,000 and 750,000 residents, I believe. Which means that even where the largest prisons are located, the prison population probably doesn't represent even 1 percent of the "constituents". Also, one of the very largest prison facilities in the US is the Pelican Bay Penitentiary in Crescent City California, which is in a safe Democratic district.
In short, this appears to be much ado about nothing. You can safely remove your tin foil hat.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)so assholes could have more power in Congress.