Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:19 AM Nov 2012

*WHY* do we allow prisoners to count as constituents if they can't vote and can't choose to be there

This artificially inflates the GOP's numbers because the prisons are largely in GOP districts.

This is wrong, and it makes the GOP think it has more clout than it does.

It makes me feel "tin foil hatty" for things like "mandatory minimum sentences" and shit.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*WHY* do we allow prisoners to count as constituents if they can't vote and can't choose to be there (Original Post) LaydeeBug Nov 2012 OP
Children can't vote and don't choose where they live do they count as constituents ? PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #1
Prisoners are of voting age, children are not... LaydeeBug Nov 2012 #4
It sounds like the same set up the South had in before the Civil War. caveat_imperator Nov 2012 #2
exactly. It's just hinky. LaydeeBug Nov 2012 #5
I didn't realize that most prisons are in GOP districts onenote Nov 2012 #3
Having looked a little closer, the impact likely is miniscule onenote Nov 2012 #6
for the same reason that slaves were allowed to count as partial people for House apportionment yurbud Nov 2012 #7

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. Children can't vote and don't choose where they live do they count as constituents ?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:23 AM
Nov 2012

You don't need to have a tin foil hat to see the conflicts inherent in the prison industry complex though.

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
4. Prisoners are of voting age, children are not...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:05 PM
Nov 2012

In order for this to be even close to fair, there'd have to be a prison in every congressional district with prportional representation.

caveat_imperator

(193 posts)
2. It sounds like the same set up the South had in before the Civil War.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:25 AM
Nov 2012

But instead today's prisoners are counted as a whole person of 2/3rds of one.

onenote

(42,714 posts)
3. I didn't realize that most prisons are in GOP districts
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:51 AM
Nov 2012

I suppose it makes sense insofar as most prisons are in rural areas, but does anyone have any actual statistics on this?

onenote

(42,714 posts)
6. Having looked a little closer, the impact likely is miniscule
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:12 PM
Nov 2012

There are over 2 million adults incarcerated in the US, but the largest correectional facilities in the country have between 3000 and 5000 prisoners. Most jails and prisons are much smaller. The average Congressional District has between 500,000 and 750,000 residents, I believe. Which means that even where the largest prisons are located, the prison population probably doesn't represent even 1 percent of the "constituents". Also, one of the very largest prison facilities in the US is the Pelican Bay Penitentiary in Crescent City California, which is in a safe Democratic district.

In short, this appears to be much ado about nothing. You can safely remove your tin foil hat.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
7. for the same reason that slaves were allowed to count as partial people for House apportionment
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 12:15 PM
Nov 2012

so assholes could have more power in Congress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*WHY* do we allow prisone...