Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:03 PM Nov 2012

How to Repair the Voting System: Sec. Debra Bowen's Answer

So, what's the answer? It's actually remarkably simple:




Optical-scan paper ballots that can be filled out using an ordinary black pen. This makes fraud hard, is inexpensive, doesn’t require (limited-in-number) machines that then cause lines to grow long.

Mandatory random hand recount of 1% of ballots, followed by increasing fractions for close races.
Optionally, a limited number of electronic voting machines that print optical scan ballots for those who have bad eyesight.

Really, that's it. There are of course policy issues regarding early voting, and the like, but the actual machinery of the voting itself is straightforward, and we just need to apply the learned wisdom of Sec. Bowen and her team across the country.


much more (links):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/07/1158596/-How-to-Repair-the-Voting-System-Sec-Debra-Bowen-s-Answer
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
5. Yup, she is the California Secretary of State Debra Bowen who make decisions about voting equipment
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:21 PM
Nov 2012

etc.

 

Autumn Colors

(2,379 posts)
4. How about scanning the ballots twice on different types/brands of optical scanners?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:21 PM
Nov 2012

The first on election day and then a second time on a different machine brought in (end of the night on election day or the next day). Any discrepancy between the two counts triggers a full hand-recount of those ballots.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
6. That is the system that we use in San Francisco.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:23 PM
Nov 2012

I still would prefer manual voting. The way it used to be, at the closing of the polls, ballots were hand counted at each precinct level and observed by volunteers and the results posted outside the polling place when the count was done.

It was a remarkable transparent system.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
12. I've done it. San Francisco precincts have about 750 eligable voters per...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:12 PM
Nov 2012

It is not difficult to hand count the results. The decades that I did it, 80s and 90s, it was the standard and it wasn't difficult.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,838 posts)
7. All good but why not a mandatory count of ALL ballots after they've been scanned?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:26 PM
Nov 2012

You can still screw with the scanner tabulation but if the scan count (done mostly for the media) was automatically followed by an official hand count who would bother messing with the tabulating?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
8. Exactly. As I said above, before scanning voting systems in San Francisco,
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:30 PM
Nov 2012

the ballots were tabulated by hand at the polling place with volunteer observers and the results posted outside the polling place. Precinct captains would collect that info from each polling place within their precinct and be able to match that with the "official" data.

Michigan Alum

(335 posts)
10. We had those but then it didn't verify how you voted on the screen or by a receipt.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:36 PM
Nov 2012

They need to have machines that will give you a receipt. Since I live in Florida, it made me very, very nervous because we are a banana republic down here. Other than that, it worked well in our polling place.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
11. Printing ballots for each voter & filling in the ovals carefully takes time, creates lines
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 03:37 PM
Nov 2012

This is the system my entire state, FL, used this year. It took 10 minutes to complete my ballot, and I already knew exactly how I was going to vote on everything. Then the scanner kept rejecting my ballot - another couple of minutes to scan every sheet successfully. It didn't instill confidence in me that it was reading my choices correctly. I was only happy we got there early, before the real early voting lines started forming.

Unless more polling stations are provided and early voting hours are extended, this is a recipe for backlogs in heavily populated districts like we saw in Miami/Dade.

Also, I don't see any mention of ensuring the tabulators can't be hacked or otherwise messed with.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
13. more important to REMOVE PARTISAN HACKS from the vote-counting process
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 04:19 PM
Nov 2012

they're the ones who "fix" the electronic vote machines and make sure certain neighborhoods don't get enough resources while other neighborhoods have too much (voting machines, ballots etc)

From now on State Secretaries of State can't also run the Republican Campaign apparatus. This happens over and over, in state after state, it's WRONG.

(I never heard of a partisan Democrat being allowed to run an entire state's voting programs, so possibly only a problem for the Repugs. Even Debra Bowen was a moderate civil service type, not an Dem operative )

Then what Secretary Bowen is suggesting might work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How to Repair the Voting ...