General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to Repair the Voting System: Sec. Debra Bowen's Answer
So, what's the answer? It's actually remarkably simple:
Mandatory random hand recount of 1% of ballots, followed by increasing fractions for close races.
Optionally, a limited number of electronic voting machines that print optical scan ballots for those who have bad eyesight.
Really, that's it. There are of course policy issues regarding early voting, and the like, but the actual machinery of the voting itself is straightforward, and we just need to apply the learned wisdom of Sec. Bowen and her team across the country.
much more (links):
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/07/1158596/-How-to-Repair-the-Voting-System-Sec-Debra-Bowen-s-Answer
msongs
(67,407 posts)BeeBee
(1,074 posts)These are exactly the reasons I voted for her.
Brother Buzz
(36,439 posts)Oh, wait a minute.......
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)etc.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)The first on election day and then a second time on a different machine brought in (end of the night on election day or the next day). Any discrepancy between the two counts triggers a full hand-recount of those ballots.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)I still would prefer manual voting. The way it used to be, at the closing of the polls, ballots were hand counted at each precinct level and observed by volunteers and the results posted outside the polling place when the count was done.
It was a remarkable transparent system.
Brother Buzz
(36,439 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)It is not difficult to hand count the results. The decades that I did it, 80s and 90s, it was the standard and it wasn't difficult.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,838 posts)You can still screw with the scanner tabulation but if the scan count (done mostly for the media) was automatically followed by an official hand count who would bother messing with the tabulating?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)the ballots were tabulated by hand at the polling place with volunteer observers and the results posted outside the polling place. Precinct captains would collect that info from each polling place within their precinct and be able to match that with the "official" data.
Michigan Alum
(335 posts)They need to have machines that will give you a receipt. Since I live in Florida, it made me very, very nervous because we are a banana republic down here. Other than that, it worked well in our polling place.
magellan
(13,257 posts)This is the system my entire state, FL, used this year. It took 10 minutes to complete my ballot, and I already knew exactly how I was going to vote on everything. Then the scanner kept rejecting my ballot - another couple of minutes to scan every sheet successfully. It didn't instill confidence in me that it was reading my choices correctly. I was only happy we got there early, before the real early voting lines started forming.
Unless more polling stations are provided and early voting hours are extended, this is a recipe for backlogs in heavily populated districts like we saw in Miami/Dade.
Also, I don't see any mention of ensuring the tabulators can't be hacked or otherwise messed with.
librechik
(30,674 posts)they're the ones who "fix" the electronic vote machines and make sure certain neighborhoods don't get enough resources while other neighborhoods have too much (voting machines, ballots etc)
From now on State Secretaries of State can't also run the Republican Campaign apparatus. This happens over and over, in state after state, it's WRONG.
(I never heard of a partisan Democrat being allowed to run an entire state's voting programs, so possibly only a problem for the Repugs. Even Debra Bowen was a moderate civil service type, not an Dem operative )
Then what Secretary Bowen is suggesting might work.