General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmsongs
(67,406 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)RandySF
(58,835 posts)In a space of 13 years, she gone from First Lady to the Senate, to the most brutal presidential primary in history to Sec. of State. She's still brilliant, but she's not young anymore and she's got to be tired. She's in good health and has a brilliant legal mind. I think the Bench is the perfect place for her.
patricia92243
(12,595 posts)To go from flying all over the world and meeting hundreds of people to sitting in the stuffy halls of the Supreme Court might not be her cup of tea.
MADem
(135,425 posts)fly all over hell and give speeches and get paid well for it.
Why do you think they all look so happy? It's an EASY gig. The heavy lifting is done by one's staff. The tough bit is picking which decision one likes, and editing the verbiage to sound personal.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)Not that she wouldn't do a fine job, but we need young nominees who will be on the Court for decades.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)She has earned it.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)otoh she could point to examples of current members that should not be on the bench for that very reason.
RandySF
(58,835 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)and if anyone understands how the sausage is made, it's her.
She began her career working on Nixon's impeachment. She knows her way around the law of the land.
She's EMINENTLY qualified...
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)I don't think she would agree, however.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)She's now 65 years old....they would figure to have another crack at her seat in 10 to 15 years...you have noticed the age of republican appointees, right?
MADem
(135,425 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I would love an explanation as she's only a few months older than I.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Born: June 4, 1919, Chicago
Died: November 1, 2011, Washington, D.C.
You can pick your friends, but you can't pick your DNA. She's got some good genes.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)He lived to be 82 and 5 days....if you figure that she wouldn't take her seat on the court until she was 66 or 67 my 15 year term is entirely possible. Besides, I don't think Hillary would want a lifetime appointment to anything....
MADem
(135,425 posts)Women live longer than men, anyway. The actuarial tables don't lie. The rare bird in the nursing home is the male of the species.
If her father "only" lived to 82, that bodes well for a longer run for her.
That's a "lifetime" appointment for as long as the Justice wants it--see Sandra Day O'Connor (still alive and kicking, but retired from the Supremes).
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I'm simply saying I don't think she would want to work at such a responsible job right up until her dying day. She has had a remarkable life, one filled by government service. If she decides to run for president she will have my full support. But I think she also wants to be able to enjoy life without the heavy responsibilities she's been carrying for decades. She has said in the past that she doesn't believe she is qualified to sit on the SCOTUS, perhaps that's her way of saying she doesn't want to.
MADem
(135,425 posts)When ya like what ya do, why retire?
She likes public life--maybe she'd like a job with a little less travel.
Time will tell--I'll support her WHATEVER she decides!
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)ecstatic
(32,704 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)As a young teen, she worked for slave wages. She had a very hard upbringing, and she persevered. She was made of tough stuff.
She's only been dead just a few days over a year, now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Howell_Rodham
drm604
(16,230 posts)Otherwise, I'd like the idea.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)Who is the FDA's man in charge of food safety? Michael Taylor. Prior Jobs? Monsanto Attorney, and Monsanto Vice President. In fact, in the Clinton, Bush, Obama years former Monsanto employees have held prominent government positions in the USDA, the EPA, the US Senate, the White House, and other offices. Hillary Clinton once represented Monsanto in her position with the Rose law firm. Politicians from both sides of the aisle get all excited by the prospects for economic growth and world dominance that genetic engineering seems to promise, but their glassy eyes overlook the huge potential dangers. This is not a political issue though, this is an issue about health, honesty, and the fundamental rights of citizens. Why don't the opponents want genetically modified foods labeled? Could they be afraid that if you knew you wouldn't want to eat them? The bottom line is that in spite of the political or economic interests, You Have A Right To Know What You Are Eating!
http://ramona.patch.com/blog_posts/its-hard-to-fight-43000000
Don't believe it? Google it.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)good lord...
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)theKed
(1,235 posts)that trying to shift the discussion from her eligibility as a SC Justice to whether or not she has been hired by Monsanto in the past doesn't move the discussion along relevant lines.
So, who do you suggest? Is there a person out there qualified and recognizable as ready for the Supreme Court that doesn't have some connection to big business in their past? If so, whom?
Dem2TheCore
(220 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)The hearing happens in the Democratic-controlled Senate; the House has nothing to do with it.
It would be a load of Praise -n- Cakewalk.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)They like their own.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)occasionally ruling on it. The Supreme Court would be a waste of her talents.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)You used to be able to become a lawyer in many jurisdictions merely by working for a lawyer for X number of years.
MADem
(135,425 posts)She took an oath to support, protect and defend the Constitution.
She has a good sense of international law as it relates to USA as SECSTATE.
She started out as a youngster in the House on the Nixon impeachment gig.
I'd say she knows her way around the barn.
She doesn't have to sit on a bench banging a wooden hammer while wearing a black robe to have the bubble on how laws are crafted and implemented at the federal level.
Finally....she's SMART. She'd be a good justice.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)those two clusterfucks.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)madaboutharry
(40,211 posts)The target age range for SC appointments typically is 45 to 50 years old. Presidents want their judicial appointments to be around for 30 years.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I want a liberal who is going to be there as long as Justice Stevens was. No offense to Hillary, but this is for the looooong haul.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)duty she might be offered, or she deserves to be the best grandmama in the world. She can volunteer, be private, be public. WHATEVER SHE CHOOSES I will forever admire her as one of the finest, bravest, most brilliant, most caring, women in the history of this country, and/or the world.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)Hers is a nomination I could get behind despite her age. (I generally favor younger judges on the Court.)
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)45-ish
I prefer that NO justice be under 60 to start, but as long as the rules seem to be what they are now, we need someone who can stay a long time.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)madamesilverspurs
(15,804 posts)President Hillary Clinton appoints Barack Obama to the Supreme Court.
The collective anyeurism on the right would be something to behold...
-