Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 08:26 PM Mar 2023

Experts: Murdoch testimony "guts" Fox's best defense -- but he may set up top exec to "take the fall"

Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch may have damaged the company's defense in Dominion Voting Systems' $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit — but some media analysts believe he is setting up Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott to "take the fall" in the case.

Murdoch's deposition admitting that some Fox News "endorsed" false claims about the election "guts" the network's best defense, CNN legal analyst Elie Honig argued on Wednesday.

"Every day that it's on the air and continues to push some of the basis of what this defamation lawsuit's about, they do have legal liability and exposure," former federal prosecutor Laura Coates said on "The Situation Room."

Honig agreed that Murdoch's testimony "really guts what I think is the best potential defense here for Fox."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/experts-murdoch-testimony-guts-fox-s-best-defense-but-he-may-set-up-top-exec-to-take-the-fall/ar-AA1894BC

That wrinkly old prune doesn't want to take the fall.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Experts: Murdoch testimony "guts" Fox's best defense -- but he may set up top exec to "take the fall" (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2023 OP
It doesn't matter which individual "takes the fall" because the lawsuit is against the corporation. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #1
Yup, Murdoch cooked his own goose, gab13by13 Mar 2023 #3
I'm surprised he hasn't settled Trenzalore Mar 2023 #2
There really is not defense for FOX's repeated spewing of lies and continuing to employ liars. nt Samrob Mar 2023 #4

Ocelot II

(115,693 posts)
1. It doesn't matter which individual "takes the fall" because the lawsuit is against the corporation.
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 08:33 PM
Mar 2023

The legal doctrine of respondeat superior means that an employer is liable for the misdeeds of an employee acting within the course and scope of their employment. That would include both Murdoch and Scott, as well as Hannity, Carlson and the other on-air employees who broadcast the defamatory statements. So even if Murdoch blames Suzanne Scott, the verdict will come out of Fox' corporate wallet anyhow.

gab13by13

(21,337 posts)
3. Yup, Murdoch cooked his own goose,
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 08:58 PM
Mar 2023

Hopefully Fox is liable for damages, also, it may open the door for others to sue Fox.

The big enchilada would be Fox having to apologize on air for like a month. I never watch Fox but I would turn it on to listen to Bow tie boy and Hannity apologize.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Experts: Murdoch testimon...