Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThat Sound You Hear Is Donald Trump Shitting Several Bricks Over Michael Cohen's Grand Jury Testimon
That Sound You Hear Is Donald Trump Shitting Several Bricks Over Michael Cohens Grand Jury Testimony - VanityFairLast week, we learned that after seven and a half decades escaping any and all responsibility for his shady, unethical, seemingly criminal behavior, Donald Trump mightmight!soon be held accountable. That accountability, according to The New York Times, appears likely to come in the form of an indictment from the Manhattan district attorneys office, which, per the paper of record, has signaled to the ex-presidents lawyers that criminal charges for a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels could be coming. (The signal was that prosecutors invited Trump to testify before a grand jury, an invite he reportedly declined in addition to insisting on Truth Social that he did absolutely nothing wrong.) Anyway, on Monday, an old pal of the former presidents showed up to talk to the grand jury from which the indictment would comeand were guessing the details he shared did not help make the case for innocence!
Speaking to reporters outside a Manhattan courthouse, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen said his goal was to tell the truth and that he is not seeking revenge against his former boss. This is all about accountability, Cohen said. He needs to be held accountable for his dirty deeds.
Cohens testimony is presumably of particular interest to prosecutors given his central role in the hush money case; Cohen was the one to pay Daniels, on the eve of the 2016 election, to stay quiet about the affair she alleged to have had with Trump, a detail which probably wouldnt have gone over well with voters. The then Trump Organization attorney was subsequently reimbursed for the $130,000 while Trump was in office, with the leader of the free world, per the Times, signing monthly checks. Asked while testifying before Congress why his reimbursement was spread out over several months instead of being taken care of in one or two lump sums, Cohen said it was in order to hide what the payment was, explaining it was meant to look like a retainer. Asked in congressional testimony if Trump knew about the deal, Cohen answered, Oh, he knew about everything, yes. (In fact, the former Trump Organization lawyer has said he arranged the hush money payoff at Trumps direction.)
As for the likelihood of charges, they appear to remain high, as The New York Times noted on Monday. In addition to inviting Trump to testify, the DAs office has already questioned at least seven other people before the grand jury this year, and, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke with the Times, Cohen is expected to be one of the last witnesses; as the Times notes, it would be rare for a prosecutor in a high-profile white-collar case to question nearly every relevant witness without intending to seek an indictment. Also on Monday, one of Trumps lawyers, Joseph Tacopina, told Good Morning America that the ex-presidents legal team recently met with prosecutors to argue against an indictment.
As for the actual why of the charges, meaning, why cant you just pay any porn star you want to keep quiet, heres the Times on that:
Speaking to reporters outside a Manhattan courthouse, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen said his goal was to tell the truth and that he is not seeking revenge against his former boss. This is all about accountability, Cohen said. He needs to be held accountable for his dirty deeds.
Cohens testimony is presumably of particular interest to prosecutors given his central role in the hush money case; Cohen was the one to pay Daniels, on the eve of the 2016 election, to stay quiet about the affair she alleged to have had with Trump, a detail which probably wouldnt have gone over well with voters. The then Trump Organization attorney was subsequently reimbursed for the $130,000 while Trump was in office, with the leader of the free world, per the Times, signing monthly checks. Asked while testifying before Congress why his reimbursement was spread out over several months instead of being taken care of in one or two lump sums, Cohen said it was in order to hide what the payment was, explaining it was meant to look like a retainer. Asked in congressional testimony if Trump knew about the deal, Cohen answered, Oh, he knew about everything, yes. (In fact, the former Trump Organization lawyer has said he arranged the hush money payoff at Trumps direction.)
As for the likelihood of charges, they appear to remain high, as The New York Times noted on Monday. In addition to inviting Trump to testify, the DAs office has already questioned at least seven other people before the grand jury this year, and, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke with the Times, Cohen is expected to be one of the last witnesses; as the Times notes, it would be rare for a prosecutor in a high-profile white-collar case to question nearly every relevant witness without intending to seek an indictment. Also on Monday, one of Trumps lawyers, Joseph Tacopina, told Good Morning America that the ex-presidents legal team recently met with prosecutors to argue against an indictment.
As for the actual why of the charges, meaning, why cant you just pay any porn star you want to keep quiet, heres the Times on that:
Archive Link: https://archive.ph/1Je7P
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 979 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post