Texas Judge's handling of mifepristone case is faulty
Last edited Wed Mar 15, 2023, 11:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Heres What Happens If Trump Judge Ends Access To Critical Abortion Drug Nationwide
Lawyers, reporters and members of public queued up outside a courthouse in Amarillo, Texas before dawn on Wednesday for a chance to be inside the room as a single federal judge contemplated in proceedings hed sought to shield from public scrutiny whether to end access to the most widely-used abortion medication in America.
-snip-
The outcome of this case could impact the entire country. The court should be making every effort possible to ensure the public has visibility into what is happening, but instead the opposite has happened, Smith said in an emailed statement. We are alarmed by this attempt to conceal what should be public information, especially in such a consequential case.
The case,
ACLU senior staff attorney Lorie Chaiten told Rolling Stone in January, should never have made it this far: It is baseless
Its time-barred. It has enormous jurisdictional defects. In the normal world, this case gets dismissed. According to the FDA, more than 3.7 million Americans have used mifepristone, which is taken together with another drug, misoprostol, to terminate unwanted pregnancies since the agency approved the abortion pill in 2000. Mifepristone, it is often noted, has a better safety record than either Tylenol or Viagra.
Under federal law, anyone can challenge FDA approval of a drug within the first six years a window has long since closed for mifepristone, which the FDA approved in 2000. According to the
Washington Post, when asked on Wednesday if there was precedent for a court intervening in an approval so many years after a drug had been on the market, a lawyer arguing on behalf of the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine admitted there was none.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/happens-trump-judge-ends-access-202644342.html
The question is are the courts so stacked this unprecedented case will stand?