Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nicole was pretty upset today with the DOJ and Garland. (Original Post) triron Mar 2023 OP
Bush's former press secretary is upset? I'm concerned. live love laugh Mar 2023 #1
Pay no attention to her actual words or behavior since then Hekate Mar 2023 #6
People can change, of course, and she has. whathehell Mar 2023 #8
She is on our side, anyone implying otherwise is uninformed at best. onecaliberal Mar 2023 #14
I think the dialogue was intended to bring understanding. LiberalFighter Mar 2023 #2
Can't say as I blame her... Wounded Bear Mar 2023 #3
And because of that we've been in a slow rolling coup that is gaining steam. onecaliberal Mar 2023 #15
She was a defeatist today. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #4
It has been over two years, and finally a special prosecutor was appointed JohnSJ Mar 2023 #5
Yes, because Trump announced he was running for president. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #7
Thanks for that. Cha Mar 2023 #12
1000+ DOJ arrests of insurrectionists moondust Mar 2023 #9
That's nothing to the DU "insiders". live love laugh Mar 2023 #22
the woman who picked Sarah Palin because she thought she was 'cool?' bigtree Mar 2023 #10
Who here thought John Edwards was terrific? PCIntern Mar 2023 #17
who thought Bush's communication's director would do any better? bigtree Mar 2023 #18
Really... PCIntern Mar 2023 #21
It's like the DOJ for fear is wanting Georgia or NY to do the job. Emile Mar 2023 #11
So? Elessar Zappa Mar 2023 #13
All these talking heads need to be applying pressure on the DOJ. Emile Mar 2023 #16
Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I don;'t care what it happens to be. brooklynite Mar 2023 #19
I love it because it agitates a certain wing BannonsLiver Mar 2023 #20
Now you've done it. Let Loose The Harpies!!! Stinky The Clown Mar 2023 #23

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
6. Pay no attention to her actual words or behavior since then
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:19 PM
Mar 2023

She revered McCain, but Pailin was so awful that Nicolle did not vote for him. She has been very vocal about being a never-Trumper and about being an ex-Republican. She is the one person on the TV machine that reliably refers to TFG as “the twice-impeached disgraced ex-President” practically every time she says his name.

But okay. Nobody changes. I’m sure she’ll burn in hell.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
8. People can change, of course, and she has.
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:29 PM
Mar 2023

I like her very much and I watch her show almost daily.

LiberalFighter

(50,912 posts)
2. I think the dialogue was intended to bring understanding.
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:01 PM
Mar 2023

Neal provided the who and why.

One of the key points was for states to convict so Trump couldn't pardoned them.

Wounded Bear

(58,649 posts)
3. Can't say as I blame her...
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:04 PM
Mar 2023

DOJ has had the slows on bringing closure on the whole trum/Jan 6/election fraud thing.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
4. She was a defeatist today.
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:07 PM
Mar 2023

I watched the show. Some of the things she said were not accurate. The guest prosecutor tried to push back a little on what she was saying. She wouldn't listen to him. People are frustrated and are emotionally speaking out.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
7. Yes, because Trump announced he was running for president.
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:27 PM
Mar 2023

Only Garland can answer the questions people are asking. People are speculating and making accusations that may or may not true.
When people don't have answers they think the worse.

moondust

(19,979 posts)
9. 1000+ DOJ arrests of insurrectionists
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:36 PM
Mar 2023

and associated legal work consuming time and resources might also have some bearing on the slow pace.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
10. the woman who picked Sarah Palin because she thought she was 'cool?'
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 05:40 PM
Mar 2023

...Bush White House Communications Director?

Hard pass.

If you're farking talking down Garland at this point something is seriously wrong with your pov.

Dual DOJ GRAND JURIES are completing their evidentiary process and are reportedly close to the deliberative phase.

What Whinging Wallace and the rest of the people who talk like her would have Garland do is WALK AWAY FROM EVIDENCE ON THE TABLE and jump into court ahead of their grand juries.

That's the ONLY way Garland (*who isn't actually running the probes and is a ridiculous target to unload on) could move faster at this point. IT'S ON THE GRAND JURIES NOW, Bush White House Whinging Wallace.

If you're not talking about Jack Smith and the grand juries right now, you don't know what the fark you're talking about, Ninny Nicolle.

PCIntern

(25,544 posts)
17. Who here thought John Edwards was terrific?
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 07:06 PM
Mar 2023

I did.

I distinctly remember the articles on Palin and cover stories that painted her as a rising supernova. McCain needed that…the rest is history.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
18. who thought Bush's communication's director would do any better?
Thu Mar 16, 2023, 07:19 PM
Mar 2023

...and who here though Palin was a rising star?

I didn't.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nicole was pretty upset t...