General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSCOTUS Decision Leaves Arkansas Law Penalizing Israel Boycotts Stand - That's What Nat-C Fascists Do
The supreme court declined to hear an appeal from the editor of the Arkansas Times, Alan Leveritt, after a federal court upheld a law requiring him to sign a commitment not to boycott Israel in order to receive advertising contracts from the state.My "line from Vegas" certs that if this editor had argued it was against his "closely held" christian "beliefs" to promise to not boycott Israel he would have been granted cert...
niyad
(113,739 posts)MayReasonRule
(1,463 posts)Just added excerpts, I thought the article was a reasonable TLDR that well encapsulated the reason of the plaintiff and the delusion of the defendants.
I'm not a lawyer, I'm merely a fan of reason.
Laissez bon temps rouler y'all...
Do it in the moment 'cause that moment will never come again!
Samrob
(4,298 posts)Either do it or don't do it.
Don't buy where or what your conscience refuses to accept.
Don't have an abortion if you don't want one.
Don't marry same sex if you don't want to.
Don't be "woke" if you don't want to (and can't define it.)
But stop trying to make others live their lives like you want them to.
MayReasonRule
(1,463 posts)Beastly Boy
(9,535 posts)The newspaper has a right to boycott Israel, and Arkansas has a right to boycott the newspaper on the same grounds. Whatever one party argues, it will apply equally to the other party.
Frankly, I am stuck here, and the SCOTUS decision doesn't bring any clarity to the issue.
on edit: It seems that SCOTUS made the only decision it could. Were they to take the case, they would have cornered themselves into making a ruling favoring one party over the other.
former9thward
(32,121 posts)Including New York, California, Illinois, Colorado, New Jersey and many others.