General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCEO says many of his remote workers didn't open their laptops for a month
CEO says many of his remote workers didn't open their laptops for a month, and 'only the rarest of full-time caregivers' can be productive employees
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/ceo-says-many-of-his-remote-workers-didn-t-open-their-laptops-for-a-month-and-only-the-rarest-of-full-time-caregivers-can-be-productive-employees/ar-AA1a711c
snipped
At one point, he also appeared to question whether employees with caregiving responsibilities could be as committed to their jobs, addressing arguments about the subject.
"Many of you have tried to tend your own children, and, doing so, also manage your demanding work schedules and responsibilities," he said in the video.
"And while I know you're doing your best some would say they've even mastered this art but one could also argue that generally, this path is neither fair to your employer, nor fair to those children," he added.
"Now, I don't necessarily believe that, but I do believe that only the rarest of full-time caregivers can also be productive and full-time employees at the same time," he said.
A company representative declined to comment on Clarke's comments, saying it was a matter of "internal Clearlink business," but offered a general statement.
snipped
====
CEO Celebrates Worker Who Sold Family Dog After He Demanded They Return to Office
You have misinterpreted my kindness for weakness," said Clearlink CEO James Clarke in a bizarre video call in which he expressed skepticism of his own employees' motives and capacity to juggle work and parenthood.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxj574/ceo-celebrates-worker-who-sold-family-dog-after-he-demanded-they-return-to-office
snipped
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Ray Bruns
(4,287 posts)musette_sf
(10,256 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)supervision, but many others do just fine. I worked at home as an employee, subcontractor and self-employed, and knew a bunch of others who did too.
A bigger sift from those who do well remotely is those who just for various reasons need frequent instruction and interactive attention of various types.
jimfields33
(17,313 posts)Question is why was this allowed to go for so long? Time for some firing.
emulatorloo
(45,332 posts)If it were true, no true business person would allow it to happen for a month.
Seems like yet another bullshit artist.
woodsprite
(12,024 posts)Hubby and I are in IT and have been working at home since Mar 13 2020. We're engaged and active with our coworkers and bosses at any time during the day (from 8-5pm).
We're expected to run MS Teams and Zoom all day when working, be available for impromptu meetings where we have our cameras on, and be logged in through VPN to access our workspace. If we don't have interactions with our keyboard or mouse after a certain length of time (8 min by my experiments), we go on idle status which is visible to system admins. That 8 min window should be enough time to grab a cup of coffee, run to the bathroom, etc. If someone is taking their dog out, taking an exercise break, or taking a late lunch - any time that falls outside of the swing lunch break of 12 and 2:00 - we message the team to let them know.
It seems to be working for our group. Our old offices have turned into "hotelling" space so if we want to go back into the office, we have to book a time. That may change with a new director coming on board, but chances are we'll stay with some hybrid model.
jimfields33
(17,313 posts)Im thinking this group in the article is very rare.
ZonkerHarris
(24,705 posts)jimfields33
(17,313 posts)ruet
(10,044 posts)Also, what software is doing this "activity logging"? Is it accurate? Is it fit for purpose? Has it been audited and can we see those results? The days of taking laissez-faire capitalists at their word are just about over.
r/antiwork
jimfields33
(17,313 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,705 posts)which he basically said, along with how people are quite quitting on him and they can't be good workers if they're also caregivers
it's like a greatest hits of CEO grievances.
you know why I don't believe him?
It's because he's addressing all his employees
And if he actually had proof of that there would be 30 EX employees
why would the CEO tolerate that?
Why?
Because it didn't happen
Not the first CEO to lie to his employees in order to "keep them in line"
Ace Rothstein
(3,252 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,287 posts)Employees
What a psychopath.
Quixote1818
(29,697 posts)the entire company but just saying "30 of you". If it were legitimate they would have just contacted the 30 of them directly. Sounds like they are just trying to make it sound like remote workers are lazy but not hitting anyone directly just to bloviate.
uponit7771
(90,668 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,931 posts)uponit7771
(90,668 posts)Demsrule86
(69,919 posts)so they rescinded it almost immediately
ZonkerHarris
(24,705 posts)Indykatie
(3,775 posts)Any remote worker knows their log on time is being recorded. Who would go an entire week let alone a month without bothering to log on?
carpetbagger
(4,432 posts)30 out of 10,000 or whatever. I bet when you take out the mismatched inventory, employees who left the company and took a month to turn in the laptop or didn't get removed from a database right away, sick/maternity leave, you're down to 5. And three of them have weird jobs that aren't like the others.
But he seems to have a fixed opinion about working, so never mind. And eat the rich.
DBoon
(22,647 posts)One of my favorite things was getting a list of currently active users from IT and comparing it to a list of terminated employees from HR.
If this guy only has 30 terminated employees that still have network access, he is actually not doing too bad.
Of course, blaming terminated employees for not working is its own brand of stupid.
LuckyCharms
(18,093 posts)30 people not opening their laptops for a month means 30 people are not getting any work done for a month.
If 30 people are not getting any work done for a month, and he has to look at "activity logs" to figure that out, then his company has problems that have nothing to do with the work-at-home employees.
CEO is either lying, embellishing, or he's stupid.
Chainfire
(17,757 posts)Even if it were true, it would be management's fault for letting it go for a month. The big problem with employees working from home is that it is harder to lord over them. It takes all of the fun out of management.
LuckyCharms
(18,093 posts)![](/emoticons/thumbsup.gif)