Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOrnstein: Staying Clear-Eyed About Republican Radicalism on the Debt Ceiling
https://www.thebulwark.com/staying-clear-eyed-about-republican-radicalism-on-the-debt-ceiling/*snip*
How radical is the proposal that House Republicans passed? You can read the bill for yourself here, but Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell summarized it well: Under the plan, most overall nondefense discretionary spending would be slashed by nearly one-third on average in 2024, after adjusting for inflation. The cuts would then expand to roughly 59 percent, on average, by 2033, according to estimates from both the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Center for American Progress.
How cynical is the Republican proposal? It was not passed with any expectation that it would become law, since everyone knows that the Democratic-led Senate and the Democratic president would not allow that to happen. It is a complete nonstarter. Which means that the GOP is using the possibility of devastating cuts to programs on which millions of Americans relyeviscerating crucial public services and safety net protectionsas a kind of symbolic gesture for the purposes of negotiation.
How historically extreme is the Republican proposal? Of course, we have seen politicians take that kind of stance in the past, only to cut the necessary deals. Ronald Reagan, when governor of California, took a hardline stance over budget negotiationsonly to compromise and say, That sound you hear is the concrete cracking around my feet. But Reagan was a more traditional politician, unlike todays radical House Republicans like Bob Good, Ralph Norman, Matt Gaetz, Scott Perry, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and dozens more. They have already signaled that if McCarthy compromises to dilute the proposalthe proposal that, again, cannot pass but that McCarthy promised them was a bottom line, a floor not a ceilingthey will punish him.
In 2011, the United States came close to breaching the debt ceiling. Egged on by House Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy and Eric Cantor, Tea Party lawmakers pushed President Barack Obama with a series of demands, holding the debt limit hostage right to the brink, until Speaker John Boehner rescued Americas full faith and credit. But the consequences of the near miss were still severe. Americas credit rating was downgraded for the first time in history, and the resulting rise in interest rates cost taxpayers billions of dollars in the years that followed.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 505 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ornstein: Staying Clear-Eyed About Republican Radicalism on the Debt Ceiling (Original Post)
Nevilledog
May 2023
OP
mopinko
(70,144 posts)1. our credit ought to be in the shitter already.
our govt is badly broken.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)2. Biden learned the lesson of 2011
But media outlets don't seem to have learned it. When the Biden administration characterizes the House Republican bill as ruinous for things such as veterans' benefits, the fact-checkers clamor in unison that that isn't true. After all, Republicans have said, publicly, that they don't want to cut veterans' benefits. Sure the bill doesn't specifically exempt vet benefits from cuts, but Republicans would never ever do that, and they're very insulted that people might think so. No, they won't rewrite the bill to specifically carve out any programs. What? Don't you trust them?