General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Google's New ChatGPT-Style Search Could Kill the Websites That Feed It (PC Mag)
https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/why-googles-new-chatgpt-style-search-could-kill-the-websites-that-feedArchive at https://archive.ph/47gOH
But what if that wealth of content is reduced to grist for a bigger mill? Google's new AI search experience pushes links to articles below the digital fold, summarizing the response to a search query up top as a conversational, ChatGPT-style paragraph. Content in the answer, a mini-article in itself, can theoretically come from PCMag and a host of other publications.
-snip-
Writers watching a live demo of the new experience at Google's I/O conference found it chilling. Did Google receive that e-bike and set it up?" asks Angela Moscaritolo, PCMag's health and fitness expert. She reviewed the Aventon Aventure Ebike, which the demo suggested for commuters as "good for hill climbing."
-snip-
With what we've seen from Google thus far, users can't truly know if the information came from a PCMag article, customer reviews, marketing claims on a manufacturer's product pageor some undistinguished mish-mosh of all that. The even more chilling thing for society as a whole? If Google goes down this path, that source material could end up less likely to be from trusted publications and sources, because the revenue hit they take means they may not be around.
-snip-
"Google has been juggling between whether it's dependent on journalism, or whether it wants to usurp it, for years," says Segan. "It seems to keep wanting to grow into...the canonical, one-stop source for information. But as it does that, it risks destroying all of the information sources it uses."
I've seen a lot of commentary like this already on Google's asinine plans for their new search.
The little article their bot will present is basically designed to end the search there. It doesn't quote any sites or link directly to them from the article. There will of course be ads designed to sell you something. But you won't know the sources of the article's information.
It's the search equivalent of the text-generating AI ripping off countless writers, and the image-generating AI ripping off visual artists, and the music AI ripping off singers and musicians.
And it will badly hurt the very websites it draws its information from.
Google's Sundar Pichai, like OpenAI's Sam Altman, appears to be so hypnotized by AI that his own brain has stopped working.
SWBTATTReg
(22,133 posts)Metaphorical
(1,603 posts)is currently in the works that would require that any content that is generated by an AI contain relevant citations to the source material of that particular content, upon penalty of being banned by the EU for repeated violations. This Act (https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/) is both broad and rather stunning in its implications, in that it basically says that the European Union will not let AI destroy the livelihood of its citizens by theft of source material, lack of provenance of citation, or lack of compensation for those creators whose content is used by large language model systems. I expect if it does go through, you can expect California to release a similar act (Newsom has indicated his desire to do so), likely with other states such as New York, Massachusetts and Washington following suit.
highplainsdem
(49,001 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,155 posts)Google Unveils Plan to Demolish the Journalism Industry Using AI
highplainsdem
(49,001 posts)Response to highplainsdem (Original post)
ARPad95 This message was self-deleted by its author.
highplainsdem
(49,001 posts)We're discussing Google's new search.