General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLow-key fascism tweet: "The United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy"
Nightly PSA: The increasingly common slogan "The United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy" is, on the one hand, illiterate nonsense and an assertion of ignorance, and on the other, a low-key expression of fascism.
Link to tweet
?s=20
roamer65
(36,745 posts)A federation of states under a constitution that starts We the People
.
The following quote rings truer now than it did 200 plus years ago.
Madam, we gave you republic
if you can keep it.
- Benjamin Franklin
reymega life
(675 posts)by the republicans
SharonAnn
(13,776 posts)padfun
(1,786 posts)I think. Some might not be.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)How do you keep a federal constitutional republic together when its states are pursuing wildly different political paths?
MarcA
(2,195 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)FBaggins
(26,748 posts)The constitution does require that they have a republican form of government after all
walkingman
(7,628 posts)brewens
(13,596 posts)of the worst examples of that in our history. He needed every dime of that family fortune he was burning through to end up where he is now.
SharonAnn
(13,776 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)I believe President Carter pointed this out some years back.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)after the Citizen's United ruling, which gave oligarchic wealth a direct say in elections.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-63262/
FORMER PRESIDENT JIMMY Carter had some harsh words to say about the current state of Americas electoral process, calling the country an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery resulting in nominations for president or to elect the president. When asked this week by The Thom Hartmann Program (via The Intercept) about the Supreme Courts April 2014 decision to eliminate limits on campaign donations, Carter said the ruling violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system.
Freddie
(9,267 posts)Which is not a part of the definition of democracy or republic. Its another way of saying that minority rule is totally fine.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)makes me think of the Holy Roman Empire.
multigraincracker
(32,688 posts)There are only two types of Constitutional Republics, one is a Democratic Constitutional Republic and the other is a Banana Republic.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)Very concise. Think I'll try to remember that one.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)A constitutional republic like ours (constitutional mean we have a fucking constitution) is a type of democracy.
These people never change and never grow. The very definition of conservative
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)They are like: Look! I found the magic words that change everything!! Constitutional Republic. Olly-olly-oxen-free!!!!
William Seger
(10,779 posts)Turns out, he was just ON something.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)So these idiots don't know a republic is just one form of democracy?
William Seger
(10,779 posts)He said LOTS of stuff that was basically meaningless word games, but the dittoheads always took it as great insight.
underpants
(182,829 posts)DBoon
(22,369 posts)They thought democracy was bad because it led to socialism
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And then something about what we have to protect and no way we're letting it be destroyed. The schmuck kept trying to argue terminology, but I refused to play.
All those who care DO know what they have to fight for. Those who get warm fuzzies thinking of their Leader protecting them from too much freedom will just have to lump it.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)Targeting ignorant people. Jerry Falwell used to start sentences with that statement. And of course, like all republican propaganda, it is designed to get ignorant people to repeat it. My response to it has always been: "Democracy is the style of government, republic is the entity." They words themselves are not synonymous.
stopdiggin
(11,317 posts)(at least since former 'school days') With it's meaning being no more complex (or nefarious) than as a distinction from 'direct democracy' - which was posited to be something like a town hall meeting - every citizen has a vote on every issue. And thus 'republic' or representative form of government and governing - where the citizen's vote is at one or more removed from actual laws and legislation. And in fact, almost every modern democracy takes a somewhat similar form.
What the same phrase is intended to represent now ...
I really don't have a clue.
Suspect it has something to do with the rejection of a vast swath of law (and authority) in deference to 'individual liberty.' Which is crackpot history and legal legerdemain - and frankly I have neither the time or patience ...
Mister Ed
(5,940 posts)or
"I don't have a dog. I have a German Shepherd."
Such willful ignorance.
RegulatedCapitalistD
(416 posts)I point out that every single Communist/Socialist country is a Republic too.
Republic...not an inheritable monarchy.
Yavin4
(35,442 posts)Last edited Sun May 14, 2023, 08:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Then wait for their pea brain to function.
RegulatedCapitalistD
(416 posts)But China does
Yavin4
(35,442 posts)It' the People's Republic of China.
localroger
(3,629 posts)Democracy as referenced by this quote is generally understood as direct democracy, a system where everyone votes on important decisions and each person's vote counts equally. A republic is generally understood as a democracy where the people vote on representatives, and the representatives vote among themselves on important decisions. This separation of the public from direct decision making, and unequal representation of different populations, are both deliberate features which the Founders built into the US Constitution. This was partly for practical reasons, since communication was slow in the 18th century and direct democracy simply wouldn't have been practical, and for political reasons to reassure certain powers that they would be safe from the whims of a potentially volatile public and to entice certain states to be willing to join the union at all. That we are still living with these now obsolete and unfair features and that they were deliberately placed in our Constitution is a matter of historical fact.
Bucky
(54,027 posts)Particularly for any group of people living over an area bigger than 10 square miles or having a population of more than a few thousand, a direct democracy would be physically impossible. And there are many ways in which we have direct democracy, however, even in our bigger communities.
Recalls, referendums, resolutions, and constitutional amendments in many state elections are living examples of direct democracy in the United States. And in every state the direct election by simple majority (or simple plurality) of state officials makes us a democracy. That would be a representative democracy and in this world that is the overwhelming default for every nation that allows or pretends to public legitimacy.
The people who say we're a republican not a democracy are patrols and should be ignored. They're the flat earthers of the social sciences
Bucky
(54,027 posts)The word Republic comes from the Latin res publica, meaning of the public affairs. The two words are not synonyms because you can, indeed, have the Republic that's not a democracy. That is not our tradition.
In the strictest sense a republic literally can be any form of government that's not a monarchy. If citizens are equal under the law, then you've got a republic. But that would include places like Gaddafi's Islamic Republic of Libya, the People's Republic of China, the revolutionary theocratic Republic of Iran.
When the US government was founded in 1789, the word democracy was not yet a patriotic heartstring. George Washington used the word interchangeably with mobocracy. It was Thomas Jefferson and to some extent the French revolution that changed that sentiment. We think of Thomas Jefferson is the founder of the historical Democratic Party, but until 1800 exclusively referred to as faction as the Republican Party. The most famous quote from his 1801 inauguration was "We are all Republicans; we are all Federalists."
But the emergence of the Democratic Republican Clubs in support of his candidacy gradually changed it connotations of "democracy."
We are unquestionally a democracy and a republic. The two words have different meanings, but they are in no way mutually exclusive. It is the Jacksonian Era removal of all property requirements for voting, followed by the 13th, 15th, and 19th amendments to the Constitution that made the United States de jure and de facto a democracy as well as a republic.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)The terms are not synonyms and we are both a democracy and a republic. In basic terms, we're a democracy at state and local levels and a republic at the federal level, though that's an oversimplification.
Bucky
(54,027 posts)I remember Mitch McConnell getting in front of a TV reporter's microphone and complaining it was a "violation of democracy" to flip Senate control like that.
Republicans might argue with you about words, but they'll never honestly argue about ideas. They're not interested in ideas, only power. And their words only exist to serve their power.
mackdaddy
(1,527 posts)They seem to forget that part.
carpetbagger
(4,391 posts)Their goal is to restrict the electorate to people who look like them.
Goodheart
(5,327 posts)a "constitutional republic" is a form of democracy, dumbshits.
flashman13
(667 posts)Joe Cool
(741 posts)Direct and Indirect.
When someone says we are not a democracy, they mean we are not a direct democracy.
A republic is a form of indirect democracy.
Anyone who makes the argument that the United States is not a democracy must have failed junior high Social Studies.
David__77
(23,421 posts)And the constitution itself does not establish that system.
Chainfire
(17,549 posts)Paladin
(28,264 posts)Dead giveaway for somebody you ought to avoid at cocktail parties.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)created a republic. No question about that. The government was not democratic in the early days, by any means. Things have changed, as the Constitution was ammended. Things became more democratic -- people other than white males became voters. People could vote for senators. Thus, in theory if not practice, we are a democratic republic.
There are distinct advantages to knowing the accurate history of this country. It allows one to recognize, for example, te actual threat o fascism.
Having a grasp of words' meanings is a good thing in this context. Republic comes from "res publica" -- or "a public thing," and implies rule for the good of all, by the most enlightened class of men. Democracy comes from "demos krateo," or "rule of the people," and is not a synonym, as it implies rule by the crowd, including those deemed less "enlightene" by the wealthy.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)of a republic where the enslaved are 3/5 of a man and women don't count.
Only white males OF PROPERTY counted. You know, people with "skin in the game".
This was a major slogan of last year's Convoy movement, that we're not a democracy. They had a major intersection with the Proud Boys and insurrectionists, to the point where they harassed Fannone after a hearing and got the guy who protected him arrested.
I studied them for a while. National Park Service, Metro Police, and West Virginia LEO let them break laws right and left, day after day. But they were "constitutionalist" white "patriots".
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)People can use words correctly, but with bad intentions. And those you mention are definitely defined by bad intentions. And it is becoming all too common ...... I found, by no coincidence, that such talk started becoming a heck of a lot more common around 2008, when Senator Obama was elected president. I find that it is best to know the meaning of words and the history of the Constitution in order to debate them. For that matter, one should be familiar with Franklin's Albany Plan of Union, and the Articles of Confederation, in order to put the Constitution in the correct context.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)the Haudenosaunee, which many people believe to be the example the Founding Fathers used. A federated republic of eventually six sovereign governments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroquois_Confederacy
"The Iroquois Confederacy or Haudenosaunee is believed to have been founded by the Great Peacemaker at an unknown date estimated between 1450 and 1660, bringing together five distinct nations in the southern Great Lakes area into "The Great League of Peace".[24] Other research, however, suggests the founding occurred in 1142.[25] Each nation within this Iroquoian confederacy had a distinct language, territory, and function in the League.
The League is governed by a Grand Council, an assembly of fifty chiefs or sachems, each representing a clan of a nation.[26] "
A representative republic, in Anglo terms. Something unknown in Europe at the time, I believe.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)For but one example, in the Plan of Union, Franklin called elected officials "Sachems," which has a specific meaning ..... which is distinct from what our elected leaders do. I was the top assistant to Onondaga Chief Paul Waterman for decades, and one of his ancestors was among the Haudenosaunee that met with Franklin in Albany, as well as with several of the "Founding Fathers" in Philly.
Likewise, the Articles of Confederation uses the word "confederation" based upon Iroquois' thought ...... and surely not the southern experience. There are a number of good books on this by Onondaga Faith Keeper Oren Lyons. I recommend "Exiledin the Land of the Free: Democracy, Indian Nations, and the U.S. Constitution." For that matter, I recommend anything by Oren and/or John Mohawk, two of the wisest people I've had the opportunity to be friends with for many decades.
An interesting side note -- at least I find it interesting -- many of the maga-type people that I have known since childhood recognize that the Iroquois and other nations were treated terribly by the federal and state governments. Yet they are unfamiliar with the section of the Constitution that speaks of the relations (which has been violated over and over), much less Iroquois thought. I recently presented to an area historical society on Revolutionary War events, in these regions known as the Border Wars. I titled my presentation "Red, White, and Black: Critical Human Race Theory."
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)Warpy
(111,277 posts)and the only way to convince them otherwise is to kill off the anti democratic EC forever.
Next they'll tell us we should still be under the Articles of Confederation, a bunch of states on the brink of warfare with each other was so much better than a united country.
BWdem4life
(1,675 posts)They wont WANT the EC anymore and theyll be all about democracy.
Warpy
(111,277 posts)Didn't they re elect Paxton and The Toad (Abbott) last year? So far, they're still high on Jebus and stuck on stupid.
kairos12
(12,862 posts)BWdem4life
(1,675 posts)The only parts of the Constitution they like are the parts they misinterpret. The rest they can do without.
niyad
(113,344 posts)certifucates as cashable collateral on loans, etc.
dlk
(11,569 posts)They flunked their homework.
SCantiGOP
(13,871 posts)Why do Republicans keep trotting out his "republic not a democracy" line like it has some meaning?
A democracy is a system of government where citizens elect their government. If you disagree, you are arguing against the dictionary.
One form of democracy is a Constitutional Republic, which is what the US is.
To argue otherwise is like saying that big woody thing in my yard is not a tree; it is an oak.
However, majority rule (with protections for civil liberties), is fundamental to democracy, while it is not necessary in a Constitutional republic. Our Constitution once denied the right to vote to women, persons of color, and 18-21 year olds.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)misanthrope
(7,418 posts)"This isn't food, it's cheesecake."
"This isn't metal, it's copper."
"This isn't a mammal, it's a dog."
"This isn't a shoe, it's a Nike."
"This isn't a computer, it's an iPhone."
"This isn't a botanical, it's an azalea."
Yavin4
(35,442 posts)Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,819 posts)What they would be saying if these actions came from our side.
If Biden tried to seize power like they have, would they just shrug their shoulders and say well, after all, were not a democracy, so carry on
I think not.
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)republics aren't necessarily democracies. That just means "not an inherited monarchy".
We could say that Nazi Germany was a republic. No Kaiser.
Mike Niendorff
(3,462 posts)"Not a democracy" -- and they hate when anybody tells them otherwise. Same reason they refuse to call their opponents "the Democratic Party".
"Democracy" and "democratic" are forbidden words to them, this is the right-wing Party Speech Code. It is 100% intentional. They refuse to speak those words, and they don't want you to speak them either.
Pay attention, America.
MDN