General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElection Expert Suggests 'Racial Resentment' Too High Among GOP Voters For Black Republican to Win
Racial resentment? Just a fancy way of saying GOP voters are racist as fuck.
------
By Isaac Schorr
RealClearPolitics senior elections analyst Sean Trende cast doubt on Senator Tim Scotts (R-SC) nascent presidential campaign and the political prospects of Black Republicans more generally in a since-deleted tweet.
A third rail Ill go ahead and touch: Im not sure a Black Republican can win the presidency because I think theyll shed too many Republicans with high racial resentment levels without getting much in return, offered Trende.
Im less certain of this than I was a decade ago, because I think there are more suburban Whites who tend to vote Democratic today who might be tempted to switch to Scott, but weve seen this with candidates like Mia Love and probably some of the statewide Republican flops, he continued.
Scott has emphasized his familys history as slaves in the pre-Civil War era and farmers in the Jim Crow South.
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/im-not-sure-a-black-republican-can-win-the-presidency-elections-expert-sean-trende-suggests-racial-resentment-too-high-among-gop-voters/
calguy
(5,313 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Game - Which the GOP does - it's to be expected.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,480 posts)Republicans roots trace back to the confederates. And being racist asshats is part of thier toxic ignorant "culture".
Somebody please cancel the republicans.
Fullduplexxx
(7,864 posts)Ocelot II
(115,732 posts)ShazzieB
(16,415 posts)That's for darned sure. There aren't (anywhere near) enough black GOP voters to make up the difference, and other black voters will be put off by the Uncle Tom stench. (Or maybe I should say Uncle Tim! )
Either way, it's a losing proposition.
Ocelot II
(115,732 posts)ShazzieB
(16,415 posts)Cha
(297,293 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Bristlecone
(10,129 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Just to point that out to counter the extremely unrealistic notion that they're all rabidly racist. "They" elected Scott himself to the U.S. house and senate, after electing him to state/local offices.
They almost elected that creep Herschel Walker, who turned into their best chance to take the seat away from Democratic Senator Reverend Warnock. And a famous athlete and long accepted as admired.
Many of the right's less crazies also welcome the chance to demonstrate that they're not all as racist as maligned and, of course, that the GOP and conservatism are best for all races.
Not that I disagree that they wouldn't elect Token Tim Scott, in largest part because he is black. But also because he's almost the antithesis of the authoritarian strongman the MAGAs want. If somehow he were to win the primary, though, they'd rally to defeat us.
Ocelot II
(115,732 posts)many would stay home and not vote at all rather than vote for a Black man, even to defeat a Democrat. In the unlikely event that Scott got the nomination, TFG would for sure run as a 3rd party candidate and he'd get a whole lot of votes, enough to slaughter the GOP - not that that would be a bad thing.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I don't disagree with anything you say, I just believe their fear and antipathy toward Democrats and liberalism currently rules. They MUST defeat us.
That Scott is male is also a big factor worth noting on this topic. White nationalist/supremacist groups are always strongly male supremacist (and how revealing that the common label doesn't even mention the bone-deep denial of equality of the female half of humanity). Many of the bigots being discussed would vote for a black man to defeat a woman (should we nominate one for instance).
History has demonstrated that belief in male supremacy transcends race many times, many ways, including when black men in our country were given the vote a half century before any woman, race irrelevant.