Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court won't hear dispute over California law barring sale of foie gras
Washington The Supreme Court said Monday it won't get involved in a dispute over a California animal cruelty law that bars foie gras from being sold in the state, leaving in place a lower court ruling dismissing the case.
Foie gras is made from the enlarged livers of force-fed ducks and geese, and animal welfare groups had supported the law. As is typical, the court did not comment in declining to hear the case, and it was among many the court said Monday it would not hear.
Moulard ducks, a hybrid of white farm Peking duck and a South American Muscovy duck, are caged and force-fed at Hudson Valley Foie Gras duck farm in Ferndale, N.Y., July 18, 2019, to fatten their livers to produce foie gras.
The law doesnt completely bar Californians from eating foie gras in the state. Courts have ruled that residents can still order foie gras from out-of-state producers and have it sent to them. Restaurants and retailers are still forbidden from selling it or giving it away, however.
The foie gras case had been on hold at the high court while the justices considered a different case involving another California animal cruelty law, that one governing the sale of pork in the state. In that case, the justices earlier this month backed that law, which requires more space for breeding pigs. The pork industry has said the ruling will lead to higher costs nationwide for pork chops and bacon.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2023/05/22/supreme-court-wont-hear-dispute-over-california-law-barring-sale-of-foie-gras/70244333007/
Foie gras is made from the enlarged livers of force-fed ducks and geese, and animal welfare groups had supported the law. As is typical, the court did not comment in declining to hear the case, and it was among many the court said Monday it would not hear.
Moulard ducks, a hybrid of white farm Peking duck and a South American Muscovy duck, are caged and force-fed at Hudson Valley Foie Gras duck farm in Ferndale, N.Y., July 18, 2019, to fatten their livers to produce foie gras.
The law doesnt completely bar Californians from eating foie gras in the state. Courts have ruled that residents can still order foie gras from out-of-state producers and have it sent to them. Restaurants and retailers are still forbidden from selling it or giving it away, however.
The foie gras case had been on hold at the high court while the justices considered a different case involving another California animal cruelty law, that one governing the sale of pork in the state. In that case, the justices earlier this month backed that law, which requires more space for breeding pigs. The pork industry has said the ruling will lead to higher costs nationwide for pork chops and bacon.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/nation/2023/05/22/supreme-court-wont-hear-dispute-over-california-law-barring-sale-of-foie-gras/70244333007/
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 522 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court won't hear dispute over California law barring sale of foie gras (Original Post)
demmiblue
May 2023
OP
Suprised: Animal cruelty would seem like a "feature" for Libertarian Gorsuch & the other RW cretins.
hlthe2b
May 2023
#1
Nothing to do with animal cruelty. It is states rights. That is why civil rights are slowly being
JohnSJ
May 2023
#2
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)1. Suprised: Animal cruelty would seem like a "feature" for Libertarian Gorsuch & the other RW cretins.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)2. Nothing to do with animal cruelty. It is states rights. That is why civil rights are slowly being
whittled away because of that ideology, along with voting rights etc.
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)3. Yes, of course that is the legal issue. But, that RW segment of the court is quite enabled in
putting ideology above law. Do you deny that? This woman who no longer has autonomy over her own body begs to differ.
Funny, they are quite willing to ignore state's rights when it comes to guns.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)4. Yes, they are selective and hypocritical