Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Durham Just Made False Statements to Congress
In a subsequent exchange with Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), Durham misled the committee about another key element of the Trump-Russia scandal. McClintock observed that the central charge in the Russia collusion hoax was that Trump campaign operatives were in contact with Russian intelligence sources.
Replying to that remark, Durham said, There was no such evidence.
Thats not true.
While running Trumps campaign in the summer of 2016, Manafort had regular contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, a former Manafort employee in Ukraine who has been repeatedly identified by US government officials as a Russian agent.
In a detailed, bipartisan 2020 report, the Senate Intelligence Committee, then chaired by Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, called Kilimnik a Russian intelligence officer. A year earlier, the Mueller report said, The FBI assesses that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence. The US Treasury in 2021 declared Kilimnik was a known Russian Intelligence Services agent implementing influence operations on their behalf. The department added, During the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign, Kilimnik provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy. In 2018, Mueller indicted Kilimnik on charges of obstruction of justice.
Replying to that remark, Durham said, There was no such evidence.
Thats not true.
While running Trumps campaign in the summer of 2016, Manafort had regular contact with Konstantin Kilimnik, a former Manafort employee in Ukraine who has been repeatedly identified by US government officials as a Russian agent.
In a detailed, bipartisan 2020 report, the Senate Intelligence Committee, then chaired by Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, called Kilimnik a Russian intelligence officer. A year earlier, the Mueller report said, The FBI assesses that Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence. The US Treasury in 2021 declared Kilimnik was a known Russian Intelligence Services agent implementing influence operations on their behalf. The department added, During the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign, Kilimnik provided the Russian Intelligence Services with sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy. In 2018, Mueller indicted Kilimnik on charges of obstruction of justice.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/06/john-durham-just-made-false-statements-to-congress/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 967 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Durham Just Made False Statements to Congress (Original Post)
FSogol
Jun 2023
OP
SoFlaBro
(1,942 posts)1. Time to lock his motherfucking ass up!
n/t
Johonny
(20,889 posts)2. Basically Trumps ten counts of obstruction of justice
Prevented knowing how deeply the attempt of Russia to establish ties with Trump's campaign were.
It's generally thought Trump was too incompetent to address Russia's attempts to collude.
TheRealNorth
(9,500 posts)3. Until the DOJ presses charges....
IOKIYAR.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)4. Who is surprised by this?
crickets
(25,983 posts)5. Absolutely no one.
Does anyone think Jim Jordan will call him out for it? Nah...