Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:47 PM Jan 2012

Obama's speech moved to Bank of America stadium to help with fundraising from wealthy donors?

Venue for Obama's convention speech draws criticism
By NBC's Michael Isikoff

<...>

Convention officials vigorously defended the decision today, saying the use of the open-air 74,000 seat stadium would help excite supporters and enable far more people to see the speech, "That allows for greater participation by Americans from all walks of life," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.

<...>

But party officials privately confirmed that the move can help with fundraising despite what one called "an obvious optics" problem. And the use of a stadium -- whose naming rights belong to a bank that has been engulfed in controversies over foreclosures, bank fees and bailouts -- was denounced by some watchdog groups.

<...>

...the choice will enable the Charlotte Host Committee -- which is charged with raising the $36 million needed to pay for the convention -- to offer access to the stadium's plush skyboxes as part of a package deal of perks it has put together to entice wealthy donors and fundraisers.

Suzi Emmerling, a spokeswoman for the host committee, confirmed a Bloomberg report that those deals -- presented to Washington lobbyists last month -- include an escalating menu of packages starting with the $1 million "presidential" level. Those who buy in will receive a "premier uptown hotel room," a "platinum events package and "concierge services." Another $500,000 "Gold Rush" level includes hotel room, credentials and a "premiere events package."


Read more: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/17/10177062-venue-for-obamas-convention-speech-draws-criticism

Follow the money.

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's speech moved to Bank of America stadium to help with fundraising from wealthy donors? (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 OP
Not surprising, a member of the 1% catering to the wants of the 1% n/t MadHound Jan 2012 #1
As long as he hates the poor as much as I do. Swamp Lover Jan 2012 #5
B of A must be ecstatic over the free advertising. bet they think it's an endorsement as well nt msongs Jan 2012 #2
Looks like it's going to be a grand old party for the rich as they celebrate the success ... T S Justly Jan 2012 #3
A $1 million "presidential level" donation? A $500,000 "Gold Rush" level donation? cherokeeprogressive Jan 2012 #4
If more of us "regular" people get in, of course they'll get more money from us. uppityperson Jan 2012 #6
Nah, he just thought it would provide a better backdrop for a live shot of him sodomozing orphans. 11 Bravo Jan 2012 #7
Ah ProSense Jan 2012 #8
Sounds more like out and out lying to me Occulus Jan 2012 #17
Still ProSense Jan 2012 #22
That's the name of the stadium there. emulatorloo Jan 2012 #9
I wonder if they'll buy the naming rights for the election itself hughee99 Jan 2012 #10
So if the same placed happened to have a different name treestar Jan 2012 #11
Do you not realize why they are named "like this now."? Lionessa Jan 2012 #14
Mile High had box seats, why wasn't this brought up then? joshcryer Jan 2012 #18
Yep. I remember there was some complaint it was arrogant to have it at a stadium then treestar Jan 2012 #37
It goes RIGHT over their heads sometimes, doesn't it? Occulus Jan 2012 #19
Amen to that. Lionessa Jan 2012 #21
So, if, and it's a big if, they rename the stadium for the few days it's being used. joshcryer Jan 2012 #26
Well I guess you are just so much smarter than I am treestar Jan 2012 #38
If Citizen's Bank had actually "mistakenly" stolen an entire house in your community, Occulus Jan 2012 #44
At some point, we just have to live our lives treestar Jan 2012 #45
Not particularly, but what is to be done about it? treestar Jan 2012 #36
Obviously. "Invesco Field" didn't produce outrage in 2008. joshcryer Jan 2012 #20
If I knew how completely he got bought during 2008-09, yeah Lionessa Jan 2012 #23
He never campaigned as a populist. joshcryer Jan 2012 #25
You remembrance doesn't line up with the facts. Sorry. I've watched too many Lionessa Jan 2012 #27
Erm, I remember the primaries. joshcryer Jan 2012 #28
Well, seems Obama spoke a lot more than just then, but sure grab one speech and pretend that's all Lionessa Jan 2012 #29
Most of his speeches were rhetoric, you have to go to his big ones to get policy. joshcryer Jan 2012 #30
Thank you, you just made my point. Most of what he says is rhetoric and not to be Lionessa Jan 2012 #39
no, the Hooters was booked Whisp Jan 2012 #12
Maybe the thought is a bigger venue would babylonsister Jan 2012 #13
It's Mile High redux, Obama wants to give back, again, to his supporters. joshcryer Jan 2012 #16
Just how far out of touch some people are... 99Forever Jan 2012 #15
Seems most leaders in most countries are totally out of touch these days. Lionessa Jan 2012 #24
Hahahaha.... the New Norm. If you do it Enough, People WIll get Used to the Concept fascisthunter Jan 2012 #31
fuck... WillyT Jan 2012 #32
I hate outdoor venues. I keep thinking... "what if it rains?" aaaaaa5a Jan 2012 #33
Rolling out the red carpet for the 1% gyroscope Jan 2012 #34
Given the tone of what real everyday people are talking about, Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2012 #35
Everyday people go to these stadiums though treestar Jan 2012 #40
ya...for sporting events. But WTF our future is not a game! Joe Shlabotnik Jan 2012 #41
Oh Well, Carolina Lady Jan 2012 #42
Obviously he should move it to Cowboy's Stadium tammywammy Jan 2012 #43
 

Swamp Lover

(431 posts)
5. As long as he hates the poor as much as I do.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jan 2012

I live near Charlotte. I'll go to see the speech if they let me wear my Klan robes!!!!

(See. You're not the only one who can be ridiculous!!!!)

 

T S Justly

(884 posts)
3. Looks like it's going to be a grand old party for the rich as they celebrate the success ...
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:01 PM
Jan 2012

Of their very own President. And, in a big Nuremberg rally kind of way.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
4. A $1 million "presidential level" donation? A $500,000 "Gold Rush" level donation?
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jan 2012

And to think DUers will defend this while just the other day expressing outrage over some gold flakes sprinkled over a cookie.

Makes me want to cry...

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
6. If more of us "regular" people get in, of course they'll get more money from us.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:06 PM
Jan 2012

I don't like that stadiums are named after groups like BOA but they often are. If the campaign can raise more money, good for them.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. Ah
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:10 PM
Jan 2012
Democratic officials have emphasized for months that this year's convention won’t accept money from lobbyists and corporations. "This year, we are setting a new standard for how conventions are funded. No longer will it be sponsored with money from corporations, special interests, lobbyists and political action committees," the host committee states on its website.

But those seemingly strict rules appear to have some loopholes. While the convention committee itself won't accept cash donations from corporations, it is taking "in kind" contributions from corporations, such as food, beverages, and equipment -- costs that can often add up into the millions.

...sounds like the media trying to fan outrage.

I'm sure wherever this is held, the next venue will be a target for outrage.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
17. Sounds more like out and out lying to me
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:15 PM
Jan 2012

"No longer will it be sponsored with money from corporations,"

and

"it is taking "in kind" contributions from corporations,"


ProSense

(116,464 posts)
22. Still
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:29 PM
Jan 2012

"Sounds more like out and out lying to me"

...sounds like media spin, and it's expected. Throughout the entire 2008 campaign, Obama's rejection of lobbyist and PAC donations were constantly called into question. No reason to expect anything different this time.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
10. I wonder if they'll buy the naming rights for the election itself
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:18 PM
Jan 2012

"This election was brought to you by Bank of America"

treestar

(82,383 posts)
11. So if the same placed happened to have a different name
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:19 PM
Jan 2012

It would be just fine?

This is dumb. A lot of stadiums are named like this now.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
18. Mile High had box seats, why wasn't this brought up then?
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:17 PM
Jan 2012

This may be true and it may have been true at Mile High, but this is just outrage for outrage sake more than anything. The decision to chose a high capacity stadium was primarily to allow anyone who wanted to come, to come. What would be more interesting is if he was incapable of filling it. Which is unlikely, but then people could make a claim that he doesn't have support.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
37. Yep. I remember there was some complaint it was arrogant to have it at a stadium then
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:48 PM
Jan 2012

But the name was OK, at least.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
26. So, if, and it's a big if, they rename the stadium for the few days it's being used.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jan 2012

That'd make it all go away? He'd still be doing the high tier fund raising, which he likely did at Invesco.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
38. Well I guess you are just so much smarter than I am
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jan 2012

If I want to go to the ball game around here, I have to go to "Citizen's Bank Park." That's what they called it. Should we boycott the team? Sometimes you just have to live your life. I liked, "Veteran's Stadium" a lot better, but they blew that up.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
44. If Citizen's Bank had actually "mistakenly" stolen an entire house in your community,
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 01:11 AM
Jan 2012

and been the prime mover of dozens- even hundreds- of foreclosures apart from Grand Theft House (which is exactly what BoA has done, to people who have never done business with them)- would you still go to those games? If a local politician chose to speak there, given your local bank operated the way BoA has, rather than at a venue owned by the public- a park, a school, a community auditorium- when they had the choice, would you still vote for them?

Yes, this question directly addresses your own personal morality and sense of ethics. Just to be clear.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
45. At some point, we just have to live our lives
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 01:09 AM
Jan 2012

If one's ethics stretched that far, one would be paralyzed. I couldn't even go out - I end up patronizing the oil companies and all the evils they do every time I fill up my gas tank. I have checking accounts at banks that have undoubtedly foreclosed on somebody. I must be unethical.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
23. If I knew how completely he got bought during 2008-09, yeah
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:32 PM
Jan 2012

I would've been outraged. Back then I actually opened myself to believing Candidate Obama. But it is clear now that by not being outraged then, the door was left wide open for what we are still facing now with Obama's bought and paid for, and about to be recurring, center right administration.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
25. He never campaigned as a populist.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:37 PM
Jan 2012

He's the most consistent President I've ever seen. Center-center-right on economics and foreign policy, center-center-left on some social issues (not all).

Glad the rose colored glasses are off.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
27. You remembrance doesn't line up with the facts. Sorry. I've watched too many
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:45 PM
Jan 2012

comparative videos of what he said then vs what he actually did to be bullshit by you.

But feel free to keep your head firmly in the sand, k?

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
28. Erm, I remember the primaries.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:56 PM
Jan 2012

You're new here, so I don't blame you for thinking my head is "firmly in the sand". I remember distinctly making it clear to other DUers he was no different from Hillary. Google my name and the primaries (mandates, foreign policy, iraq war, obama, hillary), my record stands for itself.

Go read his nomination speech, targeted killing, deficit cuts, tax cuts, hard on terrorism, it's all in there. He's done everything he'd said he do. Words mean things, the popular rhetoric was just that, rhetoric. Veiled in his campaign language was no real hard left progressivism, it was very moderate policy positions.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
29. Well, seems Obama spoke a lot more than just then, but sure grab one speech and pretend that's all
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:01 PM
Jan 2012

that matters.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
30. Most of his speeches were rhetoric, you have to go to his big ones to get policy.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:05 PM
Jan 2012

Policy is where a candidates positions are expressed. And debates. Just look at the hilarious thread where Romney chastised Obama's hawkish position on the Taliban. Anyone who actually followed Obama's campaign, and I mean, followed policy positions, followed proposals, would've seen he wasn't a populist.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
39. Thank you, you just made my point. Most of what he says is rhetoric and not to be
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 11:36 PM
Jan 2012

believed.

Had I known this, yes I would've been concerned about Invesco field.

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
13. Maybe the thought is a bigger venue would
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:23 PM
Jan 2012

hold more voters. Seems like a no-brainer to me, regardless of how anyone spins it.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
16. It's Mile High redux, Obama wants to give back, again, to his supporters.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:15 PM
Jan 2012

It could've been a low key convention, where only convention goers were allowed access, but this stadium should be large enough to allow delegates (in seats closer to the podium) and voters to sit, just like Mile High.

I was there in 2008, it was pretty amazing, they gave out free tickets to anyone who wanted to go (after all the delegates were given tickets of course, but they had the special seats).

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
24. Seems most leaders in most countries are totally out of touch these days.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:34 PM
Jan 2012

Austerity for most everywhere, gifts and bonuses for the corrupt 1-10% everywhere.

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
31. Hahahaha.... the New Norm. If you do it Enough, People WIll get Used to the Concept
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:08 PM
Jan 2012

right DC? Out of touch and downright cynical to boot.

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
34. Rolling out the red carpet for the 1%
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:19 PM
Jan 2012

how entirely appropriate for the 1% administration, considering half or more of it is composed of banking executives and lobbyists. Obama's message is loud and clear. the Wall Street crooks are to be welcomed with open arms.



Wall Street has their man and his name is Barack Obama.
-M. Moore

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
35. Given the tone of what real everyday people are talking about,
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:36 PM
Jan 2012

this is a bad, bad, PR move. It only re-enforces the very real observation of Obama's pro wall street fund raising, advisors, cabinet and lack of prosecutions. This is his game to loose, if his ego, the DLC, and the sports team win-at-all costs-mentality get in the way. For Christ sake, beating Romney should be so natural.... why.... just why do this shit.....?

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
41. ya...for sporting events. But WTF our future is not a game!
Wed Jan 18, 2012, 12:42 AM
Jan 2012

Stop playing this game. Stop perpetuating the myth that 'this is the way it is and will never change', I know many see it as good vs evil (right vs. left etc) presidential football game .... but its not!

C'mon Obama, and team..... if you really represent the average Joe, then go out on a limb and campaign with the Guts that JFK, RFK (tragically) did..... go take a ride through Watts or China town. Campaigning used to be about reaching people and spreading messages with personal good vibes. Now it's a spectacle worthy of a Roman emperor. We all know what followed to Rome. Don't let your, or our, or 'Presidential' or 'imperial' or 'morally superior' exceptionalism by default' set the tone. Sick, sick sick. Obama has had legion stalwart followers, it now time to offer himself up to the people who brought him there, and prove he is not subject to those who paid him to be silent.

Carolina Lady

(33 posts)
42. Oh Well,
Wed Jan 18, 2012, 12:59 AM
Jan 2012

I live in Charlotte and volunteer for the campaign, so I'm glad that it was moved to Panther Stadium. I guess it would have been better in the smaller Time Warner Arena, AKA the Cable box, then only half of the people that can fit into Panther Stadium could attend.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's speech moved to B...