Some are criticizing giving immunity to Mark Meadows

[bigtree]

...but it's likely the immunity is limited, and most importantly, less about his personal jeopardy, and more about compelling his testimony.

A grant of immunity would keep him from withholding testimony and other information to investigators by claiming under the 5th that it might incriminate him.


Joyce Alene @JoyceWhiteVance
Caution: there is a big difference between a defendant who flips/cooperates & one who testifies because they're essentially forced to by a grant of immunity. Meadows sounds like the later.

[gab13by13]

1. Absolutely,

Mark Meadows is not cooperating, he was given immunity to compel him to testify before a grand jury.

There are 2 types of immunity, the one most likely given to Meadows was that he can't be indicted based on his testimony.

[MiniMe]

2. But he didn't get immunity if Georgia

Only Federal.

[gab13by13]

4. He only got immunity for his testimony before the grand jury,

the feds can still indict Meadows.

[H2O Man]

3. I am happy.

I think this is good. Actually, very good.

[Bluethroughu]

5. Ask him about Ginny and Clarence too?

[RockRaven]

6. Details always matter. Headlines, and social media reactions to headlines,

are not usually much concerned with those details.