Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBTRTN: Why Biden's 2024 Prospects Are Not Quite as Bad as the NY Times/Siena Poll Would Indicate
"Many friends and readers have been freaking out about the NY Times/Siena poll released earlier this week. It paints a very grim picture of Bidens reelection prospects based on polling in six swing states. Their attention-grabbing conclusion is as follows: If the results in the poll were the same next November, Mr. Trump would be poised to win more than 300 Electoral College votes, far above the 270 needed to take the White House. They based that on their data that showed Trump ahead of Biden by 4 points or more, among registered voters, in five of those six swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania; Biden was slightly ahead in Wisconsin) . They are correct in their math: if those results did not change by Election Day, 2024, then Trump would emerge the winner by a 302-236 electoral vote margin.But I dont agree with that conclusion, based on all the recent polls, and heres why, state by state:
Michigan. By the NYT/Siena polls own data, Trump may be ahead by +5 in MIchigan among registered voters, but the race is..."
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2023/11/btrtn-why-bidens-2024-prospects-are-not.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 438 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BTRTN: Why Biden's 2024 Prospects Are Not Quite as Bad as the NY Times/Siena Poll Would Indicate (Original Post)
tgards79
Nov 2023
OP
multigraincracker
(32,920 posts)1. If they are correct...
Hope I can get into Canada before they build a wall.
lees1975
(4,010 posts)2. Jen Psaki and Nicole Wallace did a much better analysis of this poll.
Pointing out some of the inconsistencies in the numbers, the fact that these are media polls and the methodology of collecting was not really up to date. We're talking 3,600 people in six states, an average of about 600 people in each. Not enough, said Jen, to do an analysis with any degree of accuracy, especially a year out. As a former WH press secretary, she wasn't obfuscating or deflecting, she was putting it out as it would be seen inside. So did Nicole Wallace, who pretty much settled on the view that polls a year out from an election haven't been right about the winner in any 21st century Presidential election. Not within 5 points.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)3. Yes, this too.
Good job by them as well as BTRTN.
tgards79
(1,415 posts)4. Kicking it up