General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTFG "Vermin" Poll
Given the fact TFG called his opponents "vermin" what percentage of his followers do you believe would harm his opponents if they thought they could get away with it?
38 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
80-100% | |
29 (76%) |
|
60-79% | |
1 (3%) |
|
40-59% | |
1 (3%) |
|
20-39% | |
1 (3%) |
|
10-19% | |
3 (8%) |
|
Less than 9% | |
3 (8%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |

Ocelot II
(123,683 posts)in order to create chaos and mayhem. The majority would just stand by and let it happen, which is just as bad.
TheRealNorth
(9,629 posts)All he would need is a dedicated band of "Brownshirts"
TexasDem69
(2,317 posts)I think the vast majority are non-violent. Some certainly would but its a small percentage. But as noted, it doesnt take a lot.
His vermin statement reminds me of the cockroaches term preceding the Rwanda genocide though.
Bettie
(17,995 posts)that we're talking about the people who will vote for him no matter what.
LuckyCharms
(19,796 posts)slight mental abuse to murder.
NotHardly
(1,941 posts)Emile
(33,315 posts)100%
Kennah
(14,465 posts)
TwilightZone
(28,835 posts)If you mean anyone who would vote for him in 2024 and serious harm, the percentage is very, very low. The truly violent wreck havoc and get a lot of press, but in the big picture (tens of millions of people) there just aren't that many of them.
If you mean only his true believers and anything from getting in a fist fight at a bar or assaulting their neighbors over politics on up, the percentage is probably a lot higher, though nowhere near the top end of this poll. It's probably in the low single digits, at most. Probably not even that.
Contrary to popular opinion, I don't think there's a mass horde of Trump supporters waiting for their chance to roam the country, leaving a trail of destruction. I think most of them are just ignorant loudmouths. Of course, that makes the real threats a little harder to identify.
qwlauren35
(6,281 posts)I put it down to 10% who would be violent.
Now, if you count how many would FUND violence, the number goes back up.