General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOrganic Consumers Assoc Calls for Boycott of Organic Brand Parent Co. That Helped Defeat Prop 37
PRESS RELEASE: (reproduced in full)Organic Consumers Association Calls for Boycott of Organic Brand Parent Companies That Helped Defeat Prop 37
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FINLAND, Minn. - Nov. 15, 2012 - The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) today called for a national boycott of the popular natural and organic brands owned by 10 parent companies that donated to defeat Prop 37, the California Right to Know GMO labeling initiative.
The OCA is also calling on other consumer protection groups, and public health, agriculture, natural health, environmental and political groups to urge their members and supporters to participate in the boycott.
"Among the largest bankrollers of the NO on 37 campaign were huge multinational food and beverage companies whose subsidiaries make billions selling popular organic and 'natural' brands," said Ronnie Cummins, Director of the OCA and the Organic Consumers Fund, which donated more than $1 million to the YES on 37 campaign. "It's time to send these companies a message: Either start supporting GMO labeling initiatives, including the upcoming one in Washington State, or consumers will stop buying your products," Cummins said.
Prop 37was narrowly defeated on Nov. 6, thanks to a relentless, deceitful $46-million advertising blitz. Among the food companies that helped to defeat the measure were:
PepsiCo (Donated $2.5M): Naked Juice, Tostitos Organic, Tropicana Organic
Kraft (Donated $2M): Boca Burgers and Back to Nature
Safeway (Member of Grocery Manufacturers Association, which donated $2M):O Organics
Coca-Cola (Donated $1.7M): Honest Tea, Odwalla
General Mills (Donated $1.2M): Muir Glen, Cascadian Farm, Larabar
Con-Agra (Donated $1.2M): Orville Redenbachers Organic, Hunts Organic, Lightlife, Alexia
Kelloggs (Donated $791k): Kashi, Bear Naked, Morningstar Farms, Gardenburger
Smuckers (Donated $555k ): R.W. Knudsen, Santa Cruz Organic
Unilever (Donated $467k): Ben & Jerrys
Dean Foods (Donated $254k): Horizon, Silk, White Wave
The OCA's million-plus network of consumers, along with the 5 million Californians who voted YES on 37 and the 90% of consumers nationwide who want mandatory GMO labeling, are gearing up for the next GMO labeling battles, in Washington State, Vermont, and Connecticut. The boycott is part of a strategy to force the parent companies of organic and natural brands to side with consumers, or risk losing their brand loyalty.
The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) is an online and grassroots non-profit 501(c)3 public interest organization campaigning for health, justice, and sustainability. The Organic Consumers Fund is a 501(c)4 allied organization of the Organic Consumers Association, focused on grassroots lobbying and legislative action.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Label the GMO crap. Those companies that refuse and fight it lose my business.
And I've purchased organic products from damned near every one of those listed.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)The way to force those companies to change is to stop buying their products, look for and buy alternatives. The dynamic is the very same that works to stop job outsourcing.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)It might be more useful to list what organic products are NOT made by companies that fought against prop 37, if there are any.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)engineered raw materials. Look, here I go bashing the Left again, but I wish the Left would fucking present alternatives at the same time they are fighting for what is both right and moral. Otherwise, we are left to seek out alternatives on our own, and some people won't take the fucking time to do that.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)bluestate says:
I wish the Left would fucking present alternatives at the same time they are fighting for what is both right and moral
What alternatives are there to what is right and moral? You desire the Left, who you are bashing again, to compromise what is right and moral, and accept that which is wrong and immoral?
kurtzapril4
(1,353 posts)to present some alternatives that are right and normal, so people know, in this instance, which companies that didn't support No on Prop. 37, in addition to protesting against what is wrong and immoral.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)The point is, the companies that manufacture non-GMO products also shelled out quite a bit of money to keep the GMO label off all of their brands, including their organic brands.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)organic industry.
Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)In addition to farm markets, individuals farms and, of course, the companies that make foods you can buy in most supermarkets. You have to scroll past the very top paragraph.
womanofthehills
(8,764 posts)Straus Family Creamery supports proposition 37 and said so on their packaging.
Their organic yogurt is beyond creamy - the best yogurt I've ever had. Also their organic coffee ice cream at the top of my list with way fewer and much healthier ingredients than Ben & Jerry's.
Another brand I like is Organic Valley who supports regional dairy farmers (1617 farmers). Organic Valley made plans to shield livestock and feed from Japanese radiation exposure from Fukushima.
sustainablefoodnews.com/printstory.php?news_id=12195
You can even see who your farmers are: http://www.organicvalley.coop/who-is-your-farmer/rocky-mountain/
My favorite desert is to freeze some fruit - partially defrost it and then cover it with Organic Valley vanilla half and half.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Goldfish Crackers targeted in natural lawsuit over genetically engineered soy as Prop 37 supporters launch GMO inside initiative
by Elaine Watson
12 Nov, 2012
While Prop 37 did not pass, the failure to disclose the presence of GMOs in foods that are marketed as natural is still generating a steady stream of civil litigation, with Goldfish Crackers the latest brand to be targeted in a class action lawsuit over genetically engineered ingredients.
<>
Restricted C+P. Great article. Link from: http://organicconsumers.org/
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)For enlightenment.
Great post!
Julie
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)is Safeway. I love O organics. ugh. I definitely back this boycott - I didn't trust the large corps when they started buying up all the small organics, and when they started their own organic fronts, and this just proves that large corporations need to be held accountable if they want to be in the organics market.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)to be a massively ill-conceived and ultimately Ahrimanic move.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)broiles
(1,370 posts)Cha
(297,655 posts)what brands have sold out to the Huge Corp.
Thanks PW!
DollarBillHines
(1,922 posts)Safeway is the only store in our town that sells cat litter.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)They have bought up lots of organic companies, and then worked to undermine the integrity of organic so that their regular chem-soaked products will seem less heinous.
RepubliThink.
quakerboy
(13,921 posts)in standard foods than in organics. Just because they see a chance to make some extra cash from the organic craze doesnt mean anything.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)NC_Nurse
(11,646 posts)NCarolinawoman
(2,825 posts)Fake, Fake, Fake! I've read about their giant feed lots and how they mistreat their dairy cows!!!
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Ill have to find a new organic tomato paste. Easy enough. If theyre going to work against telling me whats in my food then I refuse to give them any money. Period. Fuck em.
Raine
(30,540 posts)organic ones were against 37, it seems like it would've benefited them.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)Much like the cattle industry made it illegal to independently test for mad cow disease. The losses would outstrip any profit increase.
Businesses don't care about anything except making money. End of story.
roody
(10,849 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Link from: http://organicconsumers.org/
AlterNet / By Ronnie Cummins, Katherine Paul
Did Monsanto Win Prop 37? Round One in the Food Fight of Our Lives
November 9, 2012
It was a mighty fight. And its far from over.
<>
The real story is this. Prop 37, the grassroots-powered California ballot initiative to label genetically engineered foods in California has focused a national spotlight on GMOs, and the serious hazards that transgenics pose to human health and the environment.
It has permanently altered the national debate surrounding food safety, chemical-intensive agriculture, and sustainability. And it put the consumers' right-to-know and truth-in-labeling on the table for millions of Americans.
Prop 37 has exposed the dark side of Big Ag and Big Food, and their desperation to keep U.S. consumers in the dark about whether or not our food has been genetically engineered, a fundamental right enjoyed by citizens in over other 60 countries.
This monumental food fight has underscored how dirty money, indentured media, and dirty tricks have polluted our democratic process.
Prop 37 has brought together an unprecedented state and national coalition of more than 3000 organic food retailers and public health, faith and labor, consumer and agriculture, and environmental and political groups, with combined email lists of over 10 million people. The campaign collected almost a million signatures of registered voters to get on the ballot. It mobilized more than 10,000 volunteers and raised more than $8 million, much of that from individual organic consumers and natural health advocates from around the country, not just from California. It spawned new networks like GMO-Free USA and the 30-state Coalition of States for GMO Labeling, alliances that will help raise public awareness and money, and streamline the process of writing state GMO labeling laws.
Prop 37 has awakened a sleeping giant. It has created a statewide and national Movement with the potential to transform the entire U.S. food and farming system, part of a new political awakening in which grassroots forces have begun challenging the power of the corporate and political elite.
Prop 37 may indeed symbolize the "beginning of the end" for agricultural biotechnology and industrial food and farming, a profoundly unhealthy, unsustainable, climate-disrupting system that has dominated American agriculture for the last 60 years.
The real story is this. Prop 37 has created an unstoppable Movement...
<>
Prop 37 was the largest and most successful GMO labeling campaign yet, but it was not the first and it will not be the last.
In the last two years alone, 19 states have made a run at GMO labeling, either through citizens initiatives or legislative efforts. Weve come a long way from the failed push for GMO labeling in Oregon 10 years ago, a campaign that barely made a ripple outside that state. Weve put GMO labeling on the national map, and weve put Monsanto on notice: This movement is stronger than ever, and its not going away.
Activists in Washington State have already collected more than half of the signatures they need to put Initiative-522 on the ballot there in 2013. Oregon activists are eying a similar initiative in 2014. Plans are now in the works to restart campaigns in states like Vermont and Connecticut, where laws dont provide for citizens ballot initiatives, and reignite legislative those states efforts to pass GMO labeling laws. Consumer support in those states is running higher than the national average of 90%, yet previous attempts to pass laws in Vermont and Connecticut those failed when legislators caved into threats by Monsanto to sue if they passed GMO labeling laws.
<>
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)Op-Ed: Cheerios' Facebook page hijacked by anti-GMO protesters
By Anne Sewell
Dec 14, 2012
Op-Ed: Pepsico's 'Naked Juice' to feel the pain after boycotting Prop 37
By Anne Sewell
Dec 17, 2012
Links from: http://www.organicconsumers.org/