Question About The Case Against Fani Willis

[usedtobedemgurl]

I just heard, on MSNBC, part of trump’s teams objection is the guy she hired was not experienced enough. I am paraphrasing, that is not the exact wording they used but it seemed like a weird objection to me.

If I understood what they were saying, it means they are objecting to the inexperience. In other words, (and I do not believe Fani would choose someone who is inexperienced on such an important case) trump’s team wants someone who will make a great case against him, instead of who thru are arguing is inept and Trump could possibly get away with his crimes. Am I understanding this stupid premise correctly? Their orange Cheeto gawd doesn’t want a weak case against him. Are they really worshipping someone that stupid? Well obviously they are worshipping the dunce but this is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.

I know his only tactic is to delay, but to delay at the risk of coming across as the stupidest person on the planet? The argument his team is making is trump is a dumbass who wants these people removed because he wants really good people who will make an even better airtight case against dummy. And his worshippers think he is smart? Rut-roh. Stupidest folks on the planet, if I am understanding the argument correctly.

[gab13by13]

1. He is experienced,

[usedtobedemgurl]

2. Yes, he is.

That is what makes the argument so stupid!!!

[Irish_Dem]

3. He is just throwing spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks.

Trump is like a monkey throwing shit around.

It can be confusing because his strategy often makes no sense and is totally illogical as you point out.

But the point is to create chaos and confusion as well as trying to see if anyone buys the BS.


.

[SilverDawg]

4. I am watching this hearing,

And OMFG, what a load of horse crap! 💩 A complete waste of the court’s time and money!

[lapfog_1]

5. this has to do with the financial compensation paid to her boyfriend

if that is what he is.

They are trying to make the case that Fanni Willis was bringing this to trial ( never mind the grand jury ) simply to over pay the gentleman in question... in other words, this case would not exist except for the grifting scheme by Fanni Willis. Hence SEE his isn't qualified to be on the prosecution team... he is only there to get paid by Fanni in the scheme.

It doesn't matter if he is competent or experienced or not. It is the appearance of impropriety that is the problem.

[MichMan]

6. The judge in the hearing today has already ruled that his qualifications are not pertinent

[PSPS]

7. It's just a smear because he wants this to be a trial by public opinion. It has no legal merit.