General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's why Americans under 40 are so disillusioned with capitalism
![](https://i.gyazo.com/23e29ed00770cacc8135d9a3f95b3c6e.png)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/01/millennials-capitalism-security-retirement/
https://archive.is/hwyEw
![](https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/TQKXA6XVBQS3AWII4YQ52C6TVA.jpg)
Demonstrators calling for Congress to take bold actions to fight global warming are seen outside the Capitol in February 2023. (Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post)
I was at an event recently where several top business executives were perplexed about why Americans under 40 are so disillusioned with capitalism. What could they do to restore trust in our economic system? My suggestion was simple: Treat workers better. This wasnt the answer they wanted. Many rushed to tell me how generous their pay raises have been, how easy it is to go from an entry-level job to management at their company, and how they have diversified their workforce. These are all welcome efforts, but they miss the bigger picture. Young people in America have come of age during the Great Recession, the sluggish recovery that followed and then the coronavirus pandemic. Unemployment has been 10 percent or higher twice in the past 15 years. Young workers have seen how expendable they are to companies and how quickly financial security can evaporate.
Millennials have had such a tumultuous start in the workforce, they have been nicknamed the unluckiest generation. They are struggling to navigate the most unaffordable housing market since the early 1980s. And thats before anyone talks about the larger challenges of climate change, wars and political partisanship and paralysis. No one expects business leaders to solve all these problems. But they need to start acknowledging how dramatically the relationship between workers and employers has changed in the past half-century. People no longer work for the same company for the bulk of their careers. There are benefits to job-switching: It usually leads to bigger pay raises. But it has made many other aspects of peoples financial lives more complicated and less secure. Each new job has a unique, complex benefit package. Workers are now largely on their own to figure out and fund their retirement, plus a growing share of their health care and educational training. It is even more complicated for the millions of people in gig, freelance or contract jobs who are entirely on their own.
The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution has been, for most people, a shift from financial certainty to financial uncertainty, BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink wrote in his annual letter published last week. Many Americans arent saving enough for retirement on their own in 401(k)s and other individual plans. And when they do retire, they struggle to know how much to spend, because no one knows whether they will need their nest egg for a few more years or decades. Pension plans took care of this uncertainty by guaranteeing a monthly payment for as long as someone lived. The risks were on the company. Fink was refreshingly blunt that its not hard to figure out why millennials and Gen Z workers are economically anxious. They believe my generation the Baby Boomers have focused on their own financial well-being to the detriment of who comes next. And in the case of retirement, theyre right, he said.
While Fink correctly identified a key problem, his proposed solution wasnt to bring back pension plans. It was a new BlackRock product that helps people better manage their retirement spending. In other words, its a way for BlackRock to likely make more money. Its a shame that Fink didnt use his bullhorn to call on business and political leaders to shore up Social Security. Its hugely popular and the countrys most successful policy to keep people out of poverty. Young people have seen the headlines that, if nothing changes, Social Security will start having to reduce benefits in 2034. Its another reason to worry. Fink calls for raising the retirement age. Thats probably part of the solution. But a better way to ensure that Social Security will be there for younger generations is to raise taxes slightly on corporations and the wealthy. It wouldnt take much to restore this critical source of financial security for millennials and Gen Z.
snip
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
bullimiami
(13,195 posts)orthoclad
(2,910 posts)Cuthbert Allgood
(5,034 posts)CousinIT
(9,367 posts)It is punitive and unnecessary. It's a CUT. It should be left alone or even lowered back to 65 or frankly, 55. At the very least it should be left as is. Raising it every time goddamned billionaires squeal about paying taxes is unrealistic and unfair.
Bullshit.
Fink -- is a fink. That's why he doesn't mention bringing back pensions or shoring up Social Security. Rat fink, that man.
bucolic_frolic
(44,025 posts)Need a support system for those over 80 or 85.
malaise
(270,641 posts)And too many in the middle try to silence the progressives.
Raven123
(5,085 posts)Now that we have created a problem from which we profited, how can we design a solution from which we can profit. Geesh.
EXCELLENT ARTICLE.
Thanks for posting
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)![](https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/styles/800/public/2022-09/57598-home-figure1.png)
Congressional Budget Office
orthoclad
(2,910 posts)The greatest conspiracy of all operates in the open and brags about it. It's not a theory, it's a practice.
It's called "capitalism".
maxrandb
(15,543 posts)Very little discussion of "what", or "who" happened in 1980 to fuck Americas shit up for fucking generations.
Gee, what could it be that destroyed America's Middle Class since 1980?
Celerity
(44,483 posts)Midnight Writer
(22,093 posts)Greed.
The "haves" have too much and the "have-nots" have no chance.
r
Republicans are responsible for unregulated capitalism. duh
Johonny
(21,195 posts)With the union.