Defence "We move for a mistrail... court set guardrails and her testimony went over them

[Iwasthere]

Also Blanche said "A lot of the testimony that this witness talked about today is way different than the story she was peddling in 2016

"Wait, Mr Blance isnt that what OBJECTIONS are for? Jesus Christ!, He can't come back and now say, well I should of objected your honor. WTF???

[RandySF]

1. Denied

[Tree Lady]

2. They didn't object

because they wanted grounds for mistrial. More dirty games.

[Jrose]

3. Merchan denied defense's motion for mistrial (per NBC Live report)

[Oopsie Daisy]

4. I think the lack of objection was to purposely create a "situation" wherein they could move for a mistrial.

It was a calculated move that will fail.

[Ocelot II]

7. Bingo. But it was a dumb move.

The judge will deal with it by giving remedial instructions, and their failure to object to the testimony means they can't use it as an issue on appeal.

[BoRaGard]

8. But in any event, it's great material for a GOP Whine-fest

They are always on the lookout for a chance to whine.

They will have a ball with this.

[Johnny2X2X]

5. Judge, do your own job!

“Whether these are new stories or not new stories the remedy is on cross examination,” Merchan says, noting that he objected himself when he felt the defense hadn’t.

[rsdsharp]

6. Then IMPEACH her, dumbass!

You know, Trial Advocacy 101. If you can show her story is different, it will destroy her credibility with the jury.

[UTUSN]

9. Totally different from gag order guidelines!1