General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen's rights leader reportedly seeking $5M in suit over free tickets for women
https://www.sfgate.com/sports/article/fresno-grizzlies-sued-ladies-night-mens-rights-19444333.phpThe head of a national mens rights group is suing a California minor league baseball team because of its Ladies Night promotion.
The current and former owners of the Fresno Grizzlies, who play in the Single-A California League, are being sued in federal court for allegedly committing gender discrimination by giving free tickets to women as part of a promotion last May. The Fresno Bee reported that the plaintiffs are seeking $5 million in damage in the class-action suit.
Plaintiff Harry Crouch is the president of the National Coalition for Men, which says on its website that it is a nonprofit that raises awareness about the ways sex discrimination affects men and boys. The lawsuit states that Crouch and co-plaintiff Christine Johnson attended the game together, with Crouch having to pay $18 while Johnson entered the game for free.
Because of that difference in price, the plaintiffs allege the Grizzlies have violated Californias Unruh Civil Rights Act, which protects people from being discriminated against by business establishments because of their age, ancestry, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation.
The plaintiffs have hired San Diego lawyer Alfred Rava, who once sued the Oakland As over a Mothers Day promotion in 2004 and reached a settlement for what the East Bay Times reported was more than $500,000 for men who attended the game. Rava has been a part of a number of other lawsuits against businesses that ran similar promotions; he told San Diego television station KSND-TV in 2018 that he had been involved in about 300 cases involving the Unruh Act at that time.
ProfessorGAC
(65,592 posts)Civil rights laws are intended to address systemic problems.
A one night promotion is not indicative of a system issue.
Happy Hoosier
(7,521 posts)Seems like almost a parody name.
getagrip_already
(15,134 posts)Together they got a $9 discount.
I don't see the harm to either her individually or them as a couple.
And he wasn't charged anything extra as an individual.
Is he going to sue the park because of over 65 or under 12 for getting discounts he isn't entitled to?
Sounds like an entitled jerk.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,270 posts)they (they attorney) make money from low settlement amounts from lot of businesses. the plaintiffs get a cut of the $$.
Timeflyer
(2,094 posts)Oh, wait, she's co-plaintiff. Money, fame--got it.
Walleye
(31,219 posts)Elessar Zappa
(14,176 posts)Iggo
(47,632 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.