General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat if a juror risked prosecution
I know it's a big what if, but you know that they know it's all over for all of them if he's found guilty, so there is no doubt they'll go to any length. If a juror was offered $50,000,000.00? A 5+ year sentence if caught might be worth the risk to them.
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Scrivener7
(51,215 posts)It was a Hugh mistake
Rebl2
(13,785 posts)PJMcK
(22,166 posts)Could you live like that?
Scrivener7
(51,215 posts)For that, I would live in a hotel for six weeks.
Torchlight
(3,653 posts)I figure anyone who would risk taking money, would weigh that risk against the money never showing and decide, "nahhh, I think I'll just cast my vote instead. Money's better an more sure doing the morning talk show circuit"
wnylib
(22,231 posts)Your vote or your life. Which will it be?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,480 posts)... when Jim Jordan and Marjorie Taylor Greene sit at my table to have a little chat.
Nice poached egg you got there. Be a shame something should happen to it.
wnylib
(22,231 posts)and showing pics of the juror's kids leaving school to the juror. "Nice kids. I hear the girl's athletic and the boy has musical talent. Be a shame if something happened to them, wouldn't it?"
Scrivener7
(51,215 posts)learned everything he knows at Roy Cohen's knee and he has always been a good buddy of a lot of Mafia guys.
Gotti fixed about a dozen juries before he was convicted. These are the same people. It won't be about payment. It'll be about their kids or their spouse or their mother surviving the week.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)And few are that high if interested at all.
The problem is, you never know if the person you approach will report you, and put on a wire.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)Because the worry might be what if someone who didn't report it accepted it.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)Don't waste time worrying about it.
Besides if he does try they can charge him for that too.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)you know how the mob works. They never give the orders in so many words. Somebody just does it.
But, nothing we can do as you say. Lets hope it all goes smoothly.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)I was in Europe on a well deserved vacation with my family, and my very pretty assistant(s), and maybe a very pretty business agent, and of course my very pretty but deadly security guard and sheet tester.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)We are not living in pre-internet times.
NanaCat
(2,332 posts)Prosecutors aren't stupid enough to look at someone who has no discernible ties to, say, a Hoffa.
But if you were within each other's circles, then you'd get a look. If you suddenly have a bank transaction show up, or start living large during or after a major court case related to the accused, then that will raise flags.
Really.
Give investigators and prosecutors a little more credit than you have been.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)Namely that even if something as unlikely as this were to ever occur, it would be analogous to stochastic terrorism, with no direct links back to tsf.
He might appreciate it somehow, he might even laugh about it, but a prosecutor would find few threads connecting him. Certainly not enough to try a case with.
As for banking, that's a thing of the past. I could hand you a billion dollars in bitcoin on a usb drive and until you spent any of it, nobody would know you had it. If i used multiple block chains from legitimate sources, nobody would have traces out on it. It's why criminals love cyber currency.
jls4561
(1,305 posts)Dad-in-law has drained all the others.
Model35mech
(1,757 posts)I'm not trying to be an ass here.
His originating charge is a misdemeanor, does that require unanimous jury?
Does the elevation of the original charge from misdemeanor to felony require a unanimous jury?
I'm not being cute, I'm just a dumbass in Wisconsin wondering what is required for convictions at the 1st and 2nd level of this case.
unblock
(52,872 posts)Model35mech
(1,757 posts)WarGamer
(12,851 posts)Proving the felony trigger is the most difficult part of the trial, according to experts.
Model35mech
(1,757 posts)THanks
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)And they can't do that without waiving it's statute of limitations.
The misdemeaner version of these fraud crimes has past the statute of limitations. The felony version has not.
So only the defense can add it, and they would have to waive the statute of limitations.
They won't do that. His hurstiness is going for all or nothing. The felony charge will be harder to get, so he doesn't want to give the jury an easy out.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)Which will make it easy to determine. They vote on the misdemeanor first. If vote is no they stop. If they vote yes they then vote on the felony charge associated with it.
Then repeat for other charges.
I hear something other than what the experts say you refer to.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)The judge nor the prosecution can't add it because the misdemeaner count has past the statute of limitations.
The felony version has not.
It's a felony or nothing.
The defense isn't likely to waive expiration. They want it to be as difficult to convict as possible.
Elessar Zappa
(14,295 posts)Any other scenario would be a hung jury and the prosecution would have the option to re-try him.
H2O Man
(73,994 posts)goes, what if my aunt had balls? Would she be my uncle?
Iggo
(47,708 posts)H2O Man
(73,994 posts)A neurosurgeon and murderer. He was prone to spelling his name backwards. We were not close
However, .the Cisco Kid was a friend of mine.
brooklynite
(95,559 posts)This isnt an episode of Law & Order. Prosecutors know how to pick responsible Jurors. Courts know how to protect Jurors from threats and bribery.
LiberalFighter
(52,119 posts)Iwasthere
(3,207 posts)They will go to ANY length. If he's convicted they are finished. We must be ready to stand up, be strong and fight. GOTV!!!! We should not underestimate them. You know very well there has been a lot of talk, "all we need is one juror".
brooklynite
(95,559 posts)There's no indication that a conviction will radically change the forecast vote margins.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)Not that I believe in polls anymore, but a few of the "ahem" respected ones found that a statistically significant portion of voters would be less likely to vote for the orange anus if he were convicted of a felony.
So there is that.
Scrivener7
(51,215 posts)all those other times.
Besides, why engage in fantasy? No jury has ever been tampered with, right?
Generic Brad
(14,284 posts)So it would not technically be a crime. It would just be business.
getagrip_already
(15,325 posts)Campaign expenses?
How would they categorize it?