Subpoena the lib justices to SCOTUS Senate hearings

[deminks]

Last edited Thu May 23, 2024, 02:49 PM - Edit history (1)

since the cons would ignore Congress. Let the lib justices tell us what they know about Thomas and Alito, and the others for that matter.

Post by @griffinkyle

View on Threads

/?xmt=AQGzvde0GVy5e8S-0swFTsZxHh0-8bdp92ob6OpCZH0YbQ

Justice Kagan dissenting in the South Carolina gerrymandering case:

"The majority's attempt to explain its contrary result fails at every turn. The majority picks and chooses evidence to its liking; ignores or minimizes less convenient proof; disdains the panel's judgments about witness credibility … The proof is in the pudding: On page after page, the majority's opinion betrays its distance from, and lack of familiarity with, the events and evidence central to this case."

End snip.

[WarGamer]

1. you mean Senate hearings?

And I don't think it's legal, BTW...

You'd INVITE them... and they'd say NO.

[FBaggins]

3. Good point

The Senate lacks the power to subpoena justices regarding their deliberations/decisions

[FBaggins]

2. They would decline to participate

Their dissent is likely to be their only statement on the matter.