General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsa while back somone came on my du mail and said u have the right to speak your beliefs , but you dont have the right
to stonp on others . id like that person to come to my email box and point out what i did and are they a moderator . i am getting fed up to here being yelled at for no reason in my life . enough is enough. i am fighting back
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
marble falls
(59,041 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,884 posts)Oh, and it wasn't me.
AllaN01Bear
(20,213 posts)i will be using that feature should that ever happen again.
hlthe2b
(103,092 posts)where a couple of posters go back and forth quite a bit on a subthread and then seemingly resolve it... and then someone comes along days or weeks later to excoriate one or the other poster, screaming (usually in all-CAPS) "Give it a rest!!!"
What goes through the minds of some posters and their need to police (or play nanny to) everyone else--is quite curious. I'd not worry about the DU messages you are getting--just put them on ignore (unless extremely offensive or threatening--in which case you should forward them on to the administrators)
Rec
muriel_volestrangler
(101,645 posts)In your OP, you said you wanted them to get in touch and explain what they were referring to. Now you say you'll delete a message from them. If the other person can remember this event (I'm not sure how long ago this happened), then it would be better for you to be clear about how you want it to develop.
DU has not had "moderators" for nearly 12 years. But that doesn't matter; they were expressing their opinion on what you wrote, just as you were expressing your opinion on DU. They are allowed to send you mail.
samnsara
(17,759 posts)..whatever the hell that is. I yelled at them sufficiently and then reported them and then i blocked them.
I don't need idiots in my life.
i think they are fledglings...
AllaN01Bear
(20,213 posts)i was on du when the 2016 great du hack happend .gasp. 56 days w o du. omg the horror.
John1956PA
(2,820 posts)While DU was down during those days, I would occasionally check the DU page on Facebook, but there was little posting going on in that location.
Niagara
(8,118 posts)need to police DU, even telling other members what they can and can't discuss.
We're not all going to view a variety of topics the same way and that's alright because we have different points of view. It's not okay to insult and to act uncivil. Life's too short. Place them on full ignore and keep on posting, AllaN01Bear.
AllaN01Bear
(20,213 posts)![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
hlthe2b
(103,092 posts)TBF
(32,340 posts)And every now and then I clear it out & start fresh. But over the years I've noticed some folks end up there repeatedly & I figure that's probably just that we don't get along. It happens - I'm sure they don't want to hear my points either!
Perhaps the person you dealt with was just having a bad day, that happens too.
Paladin
(28,421 posts)Which is a shame, given how many individuals deserve it.
Think. Again.
(10,420 posts)I understand (and appreciate!) that you might be trying to let us all know about this person without calling them out directly, but if you just want them to continue the private email discussion as your post suggests, you can use the email two-ways.
Firestorm49
(4,080 posts)to be superior only impress themselves. Nobody likes to be put down. I wasnt raised that way and choose to defend my comments with reason, or sometimes, I just ignore them.
I recently parted ways with a lifelong friend. We were each others best man at our weddings. Since then for reasons I can only conjecture, I have become his object of anger in our Wednesday night chat group of high school friends - formerly five of us. It wasnt easy to part ways. It was necessary. Life goes on.
Firestorm49
(4,080 posts)Fla Dem
(24,300 posts)I may be wrong, haven't gotten any mail in a while. But if you get any DU Mail again like that check to see if it id's the sender.
SarahD
(1,697 posts)I was accused of suggesting that transgender women be excluded from women's sports. The subject is off limits because we are not allowed to suggest that cisgender girls and women have a legitimate complaint about the issue. We are probably better off not talking about it because the discussion spins out of control and produces heated personal accusations. There are other topics I avoid because they produce lots of heat but no light.
stopdiggin
(11,677 posts)But, yeah, TOS was invoked quite frequently (and liberally)
And a good example of where discussion becomes 'personal' - and vitrolic. (which, IMO, is where the real TOS should come into play.) Differences of opinion are fine, and a small amount of snark probably inevitable - but outright attacks and vicious slander ...
republianmushroom
(14,826 posts)don't like/want you voicing your option.
40 months and counting (includes foot dragging)