Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 09:33 PM Friday

Call to Action: Tell WaPo what you think. Write a letter to the editor. If you subscribe, cancel.

Last edited Sat Oct 26, 2024, 05:37 PM - Edit history (2)

Did you cancel WaPo? Tell us here!

Did you write a letter? If so, post it here!

If you haven't written, write and post it here!

Form
https://thewashingtonpost.formstack.com/forms/submit_a_letter_to_the_editor

Email
letters@washpost.com

Guidelines
https://helpcenter.washingtonpost.com/hc/en-us/articles/236004788-Send-a-letter-to-the-editor

Here's my letter. It's over the preferred 400 by 50 words. Decided it was close enough.

I am appalled. Sickened. Disgusted. Heartbroken. There are no words that fully capture my reaction to your refusal to endorse Kamala Harris against the utterly unfit, dangerous, fascist to his core, Donald Trump.

As Margaret Sullivan's editorial in The Guardian pointed out, editorial page editor David Shipley may "own" the decision, but clearly it is coming from above. Whether the primary architect of this dereliction of duty is owner Jeff Bezos, CEO Sir William Lewis, or executive editor Matt Murray doesn't matter. Whoever the architect is, they have destroyed the reputation of the Washington Post.

Not since the clarion call to America to rally against fascism and rising authoritarianism that FDR issued in his 1941 State of the Union address has this nation and its allies faced such danger.

As Simon Rosenberg recently reminded us, FDR's four freedoms -- Freedom from Want, Freedom from Fear, Freedom of Religion, and Freedom of the Press -- became the basis of the Atlantic Charter that brought the US and UK together in an alliance that won World War II. The four freedoms became the basis of the United Nations Charter in 1945, which laid out a global system where one nation could not have dominion over another. And then in 1948, negotiated in part by Eleanor Roosevelt, there was the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was the first time in international law individual people had human rights. We have enjoyed a Pax Americana over the last 80 years that created a golden age in human history.

Donald Trump threatens to destroy the bulwark against authoritarianism we built. He threatens our hard-won freedoms. He threatens our critical alliances. He threatens the global economy.

When individuals, public institutions, and private enterprises of good conscience and integrity were called to defeat fascism here and around the world in 1941, they answered the call.

Today, the call is just as urgent. The danger couldn't be clearer. I am appalled that you, the Washington Post, whose slogan is "Democracy Dies in Darkness" have chosen to "stay out of it."

I have cancelled my subscription. I don't care if you offer me a subscription at $1 a year. Unless you change course and do your duty as a fixture of the American press, I will not be returning. And I know I am not alone.

With or without you, the people, institutions, and enterprises that love this country and recognize that the force for good we represent must be defended, will be giving our all to defeat Donald Trump.

You still have time to join us.

If you choose not to, you will be forever counted among those who conspired in the attempted murder of the American democratic experiment.

Yours in hope that you see the light,

Patty Keeshan
Seattle, WA



24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Call to Action: Tell WaPo what you think. Write a letter to the editor. If you subscribe, cancel. (Original Post) pat_k Friday OP
Tell Bezos what you think; cancel Amazon subscriptions Bev54 Friday #1
I'm not a prime member. pat_k 16 hrs ago #8
Yeah I get that it is hard for some to drop, I dropped it about a year ago and do not even miss it Bev54 15 hrs ago #9
Good letter. I posted some comments under the online announcement, but I will write a considered letter... hlthe2b Friday #2
I too am fuming. pat_k Friday #3
I cancelled my subscription Karia Friday #4
Good on you! pat_k Friday #5
Steal my brief post, please. usonian Yesterday #6
Hear, Hear!! pat_k 15 hrs ago #10
It's a business decision. usonian 14 hrs ago #11
Greed ultimately shoots itself in the foot. pat_k 14 hrs ago #12
Excellent BlueKota 23 hrs ago #7
K&R SheltieLover 13 hrs ago #13
Thanks! pat_k 13 hrs ago #14
Thank you! SheltieLover 13 hrs ago #15
I forget the details of what I said in the letter, but it was a more "letter form" version of my comment to the announce JHB 12 hrs ago #16
You hit on a great point! pat_k 12 hrs ago #17
Share the "New Logo" usonian 11 hrs ago #18
"Democracy Dies in Cowardice" 2,150 hits 10/26 10 PM PT pat_k 6 hrs ago #21
Share. Go viral. No attribution needed nor wanted. usonian 5 hrs ago #22
This is one of those times I wish I had more of a social media footprint. pat_k 5 hrs ago #23
My social media footprint is zero. usonian 5 hrs ago #24
WAPO NO-NO.... drumpfsucks 10 hrs ago #19
Good on you! pat_k 10 hrs ago #20

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
8. I'm not a prime member.
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 02:55 PM
16 hrs ago

My step father is. He's disgusted with WaPo but prime services are pretty central to him. I suggested it, but I doubt he'll be cancelling.

I suspect that is a higher bar to get over for a lot of people. But I hope they do lose people.

Bev54

(11,829 posts)
9. Yeah I get that it is hard for some to drop, I dropped it about a year ago and do not even miss it
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 03:45 PM
15 hrs ago

Found better deals closer to home and those within our city delivered no charge. My D-I-L uses it a lot and she will not cancel but then they have 6 kids both full time jobs so I understand they don't have time to "shop" or wait like I do.

hlthe2b

(105,804 posts)
2. Good letter. I posted some comments under the online announcement, but I will write a considered letter...
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 09:41 PM
Friday

I probably need to collect my thoughts overnight. I am pretty pissed and not feeling as thoughtful as I would like.

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
3. I too am fuming.
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 09:44 PM
Friday

Perhaps I jumped the gun, but I figured I should just do it. Of course, after I sent it I made the mistake of re-reading and saw things I would edit.

Shorter would have been better.

But it is done and I'm happy about that.

Karia

(180 posts)
4. I cancelled my subscription
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 09:50 PM
Friday

I cancelled online.

If you prefer, you can call 1-800-477-4679 to cancel your Washington Post subscription.

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
5. Good on you!
Fri Oct 25, 2024, 10:25 PM
Friday

And thanks for posting the phone number.

I firmly believe many others are doing the same -- perhaps enough to wake the WaPo leadership up to the realization that refusing to do their job is more costly than whatever feared consequences prompted this terrible betrayal.

A gal can dream.

usonian

(13,216 posts)
6. Steal my brief post, please.
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 01:05 AM
Yesterday

WaPo ( and LA Times ) are waiting for 6 million to die before they take a stand against fascism.

This is not "just an election" It's a choice between democracy and fascism, life and death for countless people.

Standing up for democracy is not a guarantee that it will hold. That's why we fight daily for it, but

Appeasing a madman is a SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY of death and destruction.

MADAM President, or MADMAN President.

usonian

(13,216 posts)
11. It's a business decision.
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 04:30 PM
14 hrs ago

A. Lower taxes for billionaires along with mob rule and government militarized against dissidents and nonconformists.

B. Paying a fair share and business as usual.

Lower taxes win.

They have chosen poorly.

But Putin is happy with their choice.

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
12. Greed ultimately shoots itself in the foot.
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 04:49 PM
14 hrs ago

As they manage to successfully force through cuts in the public resources upon which the welfare and prosperity individuals and private enterprise relies, they tank the economy, and screw themselves.

And what we face now is so much more dangerous than the run-of-the-mill right wingnut "shrink government down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub" shit.

We will defeat Trump and save ourselves from the dire consequences that the nation, and world, even the wealthiest, would suffer in the unprecedented upheaval and chaos of a trump reign of terror.

And if, somehow, trump takes office... well, I just can't go there.

JHB

(37,365 posts)
16. I forget the details of what I said in the letter, but it was a more "letter form" version of my comment to the announce
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 06:23 PM
12 hrs ago
In his note, the publisher says "but in 1976 for understandable reasons at the time, we changed this long-standing policy and endorsed Jimmy Carter as president."

He does not elaborate on what the "understandable reasons at the time" were, likely because enumerating them would expose how un-understandable it is to choose this particular election to go back to the earlier non-endorsement policy.

"Democracy dies in darkness", eh? Hell of a time to turn off the light switch.

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
17. You hit on a great point!
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 06:53 PM
12 hrs ago

Of course elaborating would have exposed what a perverse betrayal it is for the Washington Post to "stand down" at this momentous juncture.

It's mind-boggling. This year is akin to 1972 Nixon v. McGovern, where "We can think of no reason to depart from that tradition this year”? Really?? The stakes in the contest of Gerald frigging Ford vs. Jimmy Carter were higher than at this juncture?? Really??

Nixon turned out to be a criminal, certainly, but if he were around today, he would probably be branded a liberal extremist by the Christian Nationalist and Fascist wings of today's Republican party.

Since 1857 The Atlantic has only endorsed five candidates, and three of the five were the opponents of Donald Trump.

We endorsed Abraham Lincoln for president in 1860 (though not, for reasons lost to history, in 1864). One hundred and four years later, we endorsed Lyndon B. Johnson for president. In 2016, we endorsed Hillary Clinton for more or less the same reason Johnson won this magazine’s endorsement in 1964. Clinton was a credible candidate who would have made a competent president, but we endorsed her because she was running against a manifestly unstable and incompetent Republican nominee. The editors of this magazine in 1964 feared Barry Goldwater less for his positions than for his zealotry and seeming lack of self-restraint.


WNBA's Seattle Storm 'proudly' endorsed Harris for president. In 2020, the team backed her bid for the White House alongside President Joe Biden, which many believe made it the first sports franchise to endorse a political candidate for president.

At a time when magazines and organizations that have rarely, or even never before endorsed a presidential candidate, recognize they MUST take a stand against Donald Trump, WaPo says they're sitting this one out?

No. This is not some return to a policy of so called "independence." It is a flagrant disregard for moral principle and decency.


usonian

(13,216 posts)
22. Share. Go viral. No attribution needed nor wanted.
Sun Oct 27, 2024, 01:32 AM
5 hrs ago

The font was easy to find (sites will decipher fonts from uploaded images), but in short, it's Georgia Italic, no surprise because Georgia is my favorite anyway.

(I used to create fonts, for a startup idea that never got started. But I learned a ton.)

I find LAT more troublesome because the culprit supposedly is blaming Gaza, which the rethugs tried mightily to use as a wedge to divide Democrats, and what are the odds that the exec got paid (extremely) handsomely for this bullshit?

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
23. This is one of those times I wish I had more of a social media footprint.
Sun Oct 27, 2024, 01:49 AM
5 hrs ago

Hoping others folks here on DU share. As for me, I posted on my facebook (may be seen by 30 friends who are actually friends) and emailed to a friend who is more active on social media with note to share -- no attribution needed or wanted.



usonian

(13,216 posts)
24. My social media footprint is zero.
Sun Oct 27, 2024, 01:52 AM
5 hrs ago

99% advantage and 1% disadvantage, maybe.

DU posts turn up very high on search results ( at least on DuckDuckGo, which is really Bing with a coat of paint, and no profiling and tracking)

I think I'll OP the logo, though the "waiting for 6 million to die" post gets the message across very well.

pat_k

(10,521 posts)
20. Good on you!
Sat Oct 26, 2024, 09:00 PM
10 hrs ago

I too was a long time subscriber. And I think that has more impact.

Cancelling now makes a statement. Even if they lure people back with great deals (I think I was paying a $1 a week for a year at one point), the difference between full price and discounted subscriptions will definitely make a dent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Call to Action: Tell WaPo...