General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan anyone tell me the back story as to why Bloomberg let the protesters back in zuccotti park?
Was he forced to on First Amendment grounds?
What I don't completely understand is the complete reversal of the November take down.
I want to believe that the protesters were so loud and strong that he HAD to back down.
Need more info. Google wasn't too helpful...
randome
(34,845 posts)OWS is sleeping...
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)It is growing in ways some would never imagine. It came to small town America yesterday and was a lot of fun. Did you know it is going to get the constitution amended?
BumRushDaShow
(128,907 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Privately owned public access space:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/opinion/zuccotti-park-and-the-private-plaza-problem.html
http://www.policymic.com/articles/zuccotti-park-is-a-model-privately-owned-public-space
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/01/1032061/-FOIA-request-reveals-Zuccotti-Park-owners-Brookfield-Properties-heavily-taxpayer-subsidized
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)"On Monday, civil rights groups filed a complaint with the city's buildings department saying the barricades were a violation of city zoning law because they restricted public access to the space. The New York Civil Liberties Union commended the removal of the barricades in a statement late Tuesday."
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)OWS exploits the peculiar legal status of that park.
It doesn't belong to the city, but is required to be open to the public.
It was a sophisticated choice.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)at least in this country. Good thinking on their part, if you are right about their ability to stratagize...
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The legal status of Zucotti Park itself is a touchstone for a whole lot of the privatization of public functions.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)access to the park. The barricades had to come down.