Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:06 PM Jan 2012

Can anyone tell me the back story as to why Bloomberg let the protesters back in zuccotti park?

Was he forced to on First Amendment grounds?

What I don't completely understand is the complete reversal of the November take down.

I want to believe that the protesters were so loud and strong that he HAD to back down.

Need more info. Google wasn't too helpful...

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can anyone tell me the back story as to why Bloomberg let the protesters back in zuccotti park? (Original Post) CTyankee Jan 2012 OP
Shhhh! Quiet... randome Jan 2012 #1
Sleeping? Nope. RobertEarl Jan 2012 #10
Isn't it privately owned? It doesn't belong to Bloomberg or the city. n/t BumRushDaShow Jan 2012 #2
Ok, again... Hissyspit Jan 2012 #5
ACLU and others... Hissyspit Jan 2012 #3
Zucotti wasn't chosen by accident jberryhill Jan 2012 #4
that is good to know. if so, it speaks to OWS' skill in setting the stage... CTyankee Jan 2012 #7
It speaks to someone's skill, for sure jberryhill Jan 2012 #9
A court said they had no right to impede the public's annabanana Jan 2012 #6
I'm guessing his general counsel saw the handwriting on the wall... CTyankee Jan 2012 #8
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. Sleeping? Nope.
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 03:41 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/106968

It is growing in ways some would never imagine. It came to small town America yesterday and was a lot of fun. Did you know it is going to get the constitution amended?

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
3. ACLU and others...
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:08 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101422691

"On Monday, civil rights groups filed a complaint with the city's buildings department saying the barricades were a violation of city zoning law because they restricted public access to the space. The New York Civil Liberties Union commended the removal of the barricades in a statement late Tuesday."
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. Zucotti wasn't chosen by accident
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:13 PM
Jan 2012

OWS exploits the peculiar legal status of that park.

It doesn't belong to the city, but is required to be open to the public.

It was a sophisticated choice.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
7. that is good to know. if so, it speaks to OWS' skill in setting the stage...
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:58 PM
Jan 2012

at least in this country. Good thinking on their part, if you are right about their ability to stratagize...

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. It speaks to someone's skill, for sure
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jan 2012

The legal status of Zucotti Park itself is a touchstone for a whole lot of the privatization of public functions.

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
6. A court said they had no right to impede the public's
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:25 PM
Jan 2012

access to the park. The barricades had to come down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can anyone tell me the ba...