General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn observation about the media response to the killing of UHC CEO Brian Thompson...
(Apologies in advance if anyone else commented on this. If so, I didn't see it. I'm not going to wade into the debate on how individuals are responding to the murder since that topic has been beaten into the ground.)At time of writing, Thompson was shot and killed about 60 hours ago. Does anyone else find it peculiar that it's been legit wall-to-wall media coverage since it happened? It's been the headline on CNN.com since it occurred, taking precedence over even the declaration of martial law in South Korea. Let's be honest, martial law being declared in a democratic ally of the United States is, by any measure, a much bigger deal than a health insurance CEO getting killed.
All the same, the media is breathlessly, relentlessly focused on this one event, seemingly to the exclusion of all other events of significance in the world over the last couple days. I can't prove it, but I'd be willing to bet that this event has received far more coverage than the assassination of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a few years back. One would think that the assassination of the head of an allied state would be covered as much as, if not more than, the killing of a CEO.
I'd say this is pretty persuasive proof of the concept of "corporate media" for anyone who doubted the concept. This event is of trifling importance for John and Jane Q. Public (or Joe Bagodonuts, as my Dad would say). On the other hand, it's of immense significance for the corporate interests that underpin our mainstream media, and their hand can be clearly seen in the way this event is being covered.
The media is clearly focusing relentlessly on this one issue because their corporate overlords demand that they do exactly that. If you run into anyone who doubts that our media is bought and paid for, I'd just gesture vaguely at the coverage of Thompson's murder and leave my argument at that.
Irish_Dem
(59,696 posts)Quite a bit of attention to this murder, to the exclusion of almost anything else.
I wonder why?
OrangeJoe
(433 posts)We dont have cable or network tv. On our trip to Mexico this winter we spent a few nights in motels in the States with televisions in them. I was totally blown away by all the ads for prescription meds. Ask your doctor if is for you. So yeah the networks pay most of their bills and inflated salaries on revenue from Big Pharma.
PeaceWave
(1,046 posts)Not one but two people here responded "I can walk and chew gum at the same time." So, it cuts both ways. The media has been pushing the CEO murder story extremely hard. However, the public has been more than willing to consume (chew?) it all.
arthritisR_US
(7,628 posts)Irish_Dem
(59,696 posts)So there is a reason to downplay the failed SK coup.
XanaDUer2
(14,602 posts)Playground manhattan. They're scared
NEOBuckeye
(2,834 posts)Maybe hes too arrogant and stupid to be.
johnnyfins
(1,482 posts)Swede
(34,868 posts)Jedi Guy
(3,320 posts)I love me a good dose of 90s nostalgia, thanks for that.
PJMcK
(23,008 posts)Aliens
Godfather II
The Empire Strikes Back
Sorry for the off-topic post.
markodochartaigh
(2,221 posts)n/t
Jedi Guy
(3,320 posts)They're in the same universe and involve the same character, but they're very different films thematically. Alien is a slasher movie set in space whereas Aliens is a war movie set in space. Of the two, I vastly prefer Aliens and it's easily the high point of the entire franchise. That said, the newest one, Alien: Romulus, was quite good. I was pleasantly surprised.
Side note: if you enjoy horror with a dash of British humor, I highly recommend Dog Soldiers. It's one of my all-time favorite horror films. Think Aliens meets The Howling meets Zulu. The practical effects are quite good (and far better than 2002-era CGI would've been) and it has some fantastic performances from Kevin McKidd, Sean Pertwee, and Liam Cunningham.
TBF
(34,748 posts)they are freaking out. They don't like this vigilante business one bit. They want to steal all they can and be applauded for it.
Random Boomer
(4,268 posts)Apparently they haven't noticed that the saturation coverage is simply advertising how many people are rooting for the shooter, or at least sympathetic to the motives of the shooter. Sure, keep that publicity going and give some other traumatized customers the idea of how to proceed after denied claims.
TBF
(34,748 posts)and no one has turned him in. There definitely is empathy/sympathy. Everyone either has a "claim denied" story of their own or knows someone who got shafted.
onecaliberal
(36,318 posts)allegorical oracle
(3,393 posts)mystery. So, from a media standpoint, the viewer tracking shows people are watching this story unfold more avidly than they are watching what's happening in S Korea. Have seen similar heavy coverage of school shootings, too.
Think. Again.
(19,046 posts)allegorical oracle
(3,393 posts)Think. Again.
(19,046 posts)JHB
(37,467 posts)A derecho (wind storm) that knocks out power for days in the Midwest can be a news afterthought (and even then, only when there's some juicy video), whereas even the possibility of a hurricane hitting the NYC metro area drowns out all else.
The exec was a guy who, even if they didn't know him, likely went to the same restaurants and shops as they did. Compared to that? What's a "Korea"?
spooky3
(36,413 posts)RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(287 posts)So, no wall to wall coverage for me. I'm guessing this is going OJ/Jon Benet from the looks of it.
Silent Type
(7,325 posts)just one of the topics discussed including Penny trial, the drunk x-FOX rapist nominee, etc.
LeftInTX
(30,594 posts)the murder. "Evil CEO of despised insurance company that denied Healthcare resulting in millions of deaths gun downed in the streets in midtown Manhattan"
"Social media pillages insurance companies"
"Reddit users paint awesome picture of suspect as angelic hero"
"Who is the hero? He won't be found guilty"
"They couldn't take it anymore"
"Someone finally stood up to UHC"
The media is just following the public's interest.
allegorical oracle
(3,393 posts)Think. Again.
(19,046 posts)H2O Man
(75,778 posts)On the other hand, more people watch "true crime" shows these days. And many of the best ones are pod casts found on the internet. I think that, in part, the "regular" media is competing for viewers.
This case is getting a lot more immediate media attention than, say, the sheriff that recently shot the judge in Kentucky. It may be to distract from more important things. But the mood of the country suggests a lot of people aren't upset about the executive.
LeftInTX
(30,594 posts)That case brought out a bunch of weirdos on social media. Good grief. I was so sick of: "The judge deserved it".
Too many right wingers enjoying vigilante and assuming the judge was sleeping with the sheriff's daughter. Now it turns out the sheriff's wife kicked the sheriff out of the house the night before he shot the judge.
It's not clear what if anything the sheriff's call on the judge's phone to his daughter was all about. But a pod cast today had a recording from the deposition the female inmate in the criminal case against the deputy/ civil case against the deputy & sheriff. She said that there are recordings of the judge participating in sex-for-favors with at least one female inmate. I'm sure that there is much more to the case.
arthritisR_US
(7,628 posts)Lulu KC
(5,015 posts)I thought the CEO killing would go on longer, but it's falling further down the page, at least on WaPo and NYT. Since it appears he left NYC for parts unknown, the energy will be dispersed geographically a little.
At least on both of those websites, Iran leaving Syria and the insurgents taking another large city are way up top, for now.
The Korean thing was so weird, since it was over in only four hours! It seemed to me to start with what looked a potential war between North and South Korea, then became, "Oh, another right wing nut to watch" and then hooray! Sanity prevailed! People demonstrated and won!
And somewhere in the middle of all this there was Hunter's pardon.
I am exhausted from the stimulation.
milestogo
(18,256 posts)Sympthsical
(10,397 posts)It's ready made for breathless media coverage, because they know people are incredibly interested.
We have a wealthy man, despised by many, who was assassinated by a shadowy figure who had an extensive plan. A decent portion of the country is hailing the assassin as a folk hero. But who is he? He vanished into thin air like a television show killer who disappears into a crowd. What were his motives? A disgruntled customer, someone burned by insider trader? Is there a conspiracy here? And you cannot deny that young man is photogenic as hell.
If your job is pure ratings - and these media companies only care about that - it's real easy to run with this for awhile.
I have absolutely clicked on the CNN website more times in the past few days than usual, because I'm curious about the latest developments. It's real life soap opera.
They're not there to inform us. They're there to entertain us. Right now, it's interesting. Not particularly useful, but interesting nonetheless. If there are no further significant developments in a day or so, you'll see the coverage peter out a bit.
The real tell of wealth inequality is the amount of resources NYPD is pouring into this one. They haven't worked this hard figuring out a murder since Giuliani's reputation was reported missing after a party.
Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)coverage.
Gun Violence last 72 hours
H2O Man
(75,778 posts)Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)Holy crap
Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,554 posts)But as you brilliantly pointed out Solly, that isnt true.
Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,554 posts)the hypocrisy of the all lives slogan and the lack of coverage of all the other victims plus the media fetishized interest in a rich mans death is a visible example of the sickness that lies within our country.
Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)Dulcinea
(7,603 posts)DSandra
(1,287 posts)America is secretly highly approving of inequality.
Solly Mack
(93,207 posts)PedroXimenez
(630 posts)just kidding of course
BaronChocula
(2,522 posts)The first time I heard that was from Dom Irera in a Dangerfield young comics special back in the 80s.
As for the CEO getting shot, I didn't hear about that until, like, a day later. I still can't watch news. It takes everything to come to DU. So I'm glad I found something to make me laugh here.
Shoonra
(568 posts)The shooter may well become (if it hasn't yet happened) our newest folk hero. UnitedHealthCare was notorious for short-changing its policy holders, and the families of many could blame an avoidable death on UHC's delaying tactics or its outright denial of benefits.
Comments on the internet include: It wasn't murder, it was a denial of benefits. Or, We aren't happy with the assassination, we're just denying an application for sympathy because outside our program parameters.
More than 48 hours after the assassination, the NYPD suspected that the suspect had left Manhattan; I expected that within an hour of the shooting, and I seriously doubt that the assassin spent two nights in Manhattan after the shooting. The two photos of his face show a handsome man, without a lot of detail (e.g. no hair color); his face, but what little was showing, looked like a million other men. He evidently planned this, including changing his jacket and getting out of town, very carefully. I honestly doubt he can be captured, and if he is, there's a chance that one of the jurors will positively hold out for a minor offense or outright acquittal. This man is the new Bernie Goetz.
Skittles
(160,304 posts)nothing to romanticize
Aussie105
(6,467 posts)Standard operational procedure for an assassin.
Quick, cleanly executed, have your getaway plan ready.
Only question I have, what is the back story on this?
Skittles
(160,304 posts)HE'S A FUCKING COWARD
Aussie105
(6,467 posts)Ask any vet who has been on active duty how much courage it takes to point a gun at another human being and pull the trigger knowing you will kill that person.
Skittles
(160,304 posts)please stop
DONE here
intheflow
(29,053 posts)The best snipers get their training in the military.
Dulcinea
(7,603 posts)Maybe this guy is ex-military, Special Forces, Green Beret, etc. He clearly knew what he was doing.
HE AIN"T NO COMBAT VET
intheflow
(29,053 posts)Which isnt even a pwn because I said we didnt know anything about him while he was at large. 🙄
Skittles
(160,304 posts)but I actually knew because combat vets got back to me saying, uh, no, no freaking way
Mr.WeRP
(661 posts)Aussie105
(6,467 posts)This single incident attracts media attention because it is too close to home.
If one of theirs, a greedy uncaring profiteering person can die like that, well, who is next?
Gun violence is ok, as long as it is some nobody, but this is too close to home for the CEOs out there!
And the media goes into semi-panic mode . . . this is terrible, shouldn't happen to one of us important people!
The media hitting the shock-panic button on this won't work, there have been too many incidents worse than this - like school shootings - where the media yawned and went 'Meh!'
But . . . don't let the media tell you how you should feel or react, that is entirely up to you.
arthritisR_US
(7,628 posts)PatrickforB
(15,126 posts)Everybody knows these sociopaths care much more about their PROFITS than they ever have about human life.
johnnyfins
(1,482 posts)TSF back in the Oval, that is.
Uncle Joe
(60,265 posts)Palestinians don't have shit, that's why the ongoing genocide; (which all the world knows is happening) is all but ignored by them.
The corporate media's prime directive isn't to inform or enlighten the American People so much as to maintain the current power structure of dog eat dog capitalism in the United States because that's how they make their mega-bucks, not to mention that they're owned by oligarchs.
Thanks for the thread Jedi Guy.
PortTack
(34,830 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 6, 2024, 11:28 PM - Edit history (2)
Nor is it our friend.
On edit: we have a real chance of bringing legacy media to their knees, including msnbc if we continue to chose not to watch, and convince more ppl what a waste of time they are. Joe Scarborough is now scolding whats left of his viewers for not liking his t-rump butt kissing. No doubt he and Mika are on the verge of facing cancellation.
Just think, we could have real news Walter Cronkite or Edward R Murrow style. Think about it
Hassler
(3,782 posts)The more people hear about it, the more they are reminded how much they hate their healthcare.
Jack Valentino
(1,510 posts)I have no memory of that....
Thing is, the way news coverage of world events goes,
you would think we in the US are the only country in the world--
we mostly talk about us, and only about us,
until some other country has an earthquake or a tsunami or a nuclear meltdown,
when our media will give them 2 minutes...
and that has been true going back to my childhood.
Maybe we ARE 'the center of the world'--
other countries give us much more news coverage than
we give all the rest of them put together
We are a very 'self-centered' nation.
Coventina
(28,013 posts)Very traumatic for the Japanese people, where gun violence is really rare.
You are correct, the USA is very self-centered.
Cirsium
(1,154 posts)The topic took off on its own with the public. The reason is because it unleashed a tidal wave of resentment and anger against the health care industry in general and especially health care insurance companies.
That public uproar is authentic and represents a legitimate grievance. As Democrats we should be supportive of that rather than dismissing or disappearing it under an avalanche of phony outrage about supposed "vigilantism."
BidenRocks
(956 posts)A child is shot and/or killed.
I'll save my sympathy for them.
Mountainguy
(1,021 posts)And his assassination was covered a lot.
This is a CEO of one of the biggest companies in the world getting shot to death on camera in the middle of Manhatten. It's getting coverage because people want it to be covered. That's why there are dozens of threads about it here.
modrepub
(3,639 posts)Their shock at most people's contempt towards this person's murder is proof they have no idea what's going on in the trenches. Whether it's bowing to their corporate master (possible) or their total lack of being out amongst the common people (fewer corporate journalists/divide between college "elites" and non-college people). it's obvious they are taken aback by the general public's response or lack of empathy.
My guess is whoever this person is, they won't be taken alive. There'd be a real risk a jury of his peers would get deadlocked or acquit. A trial exposing the person's motivation may trigger a wave of sympathy and outrage at our health care system.
DAngelo136
(314 posts)about the domination of corporations way back in the 70's? In such movies like "Rollerball" (1975)
And in Paddy Chayefsky's "Network" (1976)
But, as he pointed out, this is mostly our fault: ?si=hnVbImVFEo9GN1U1
Jedi Guy
(3,320 posts)Shadowrun, for instance, which originated in the late 80s and early 90s, is a tabletop RPG setting in which magic returns to the world in 2012, resulting in elves, dwarves, orcs, and trolls (commonly known as metahumans) existing alongside baseline humans, hypertechnology, magical creatures like dragons, etc. One of the key themes is that corporations are as powerful, if not more powerful, than national governments and are intrinsically entwined with national governments. Many of the "megacorps" have standing military forces that rival or outmatch national militaries. The United Corporate Council, made up of AAA megacorps, has more military and political power than the United Nations.
Another more recent example would be Cyberpunk 2077, a video game that launched a few years back and is based on the Cyberpunk tabletop RPG. It lacks the magic/fantasy elements of Shadowrun, but otherwise it's very similar in how corporations are presented. One of the corporations in the game, Arasaka, has a blue-water navy that includes an aircraft carrier.
I remarked to my best friend a few years back that the early 21st century as we've experienced it feels an awful lot like the prologue to a dystopian sci-fi or cyberpunk story. It's great for those atop the corporate ladder; not so much for the rest of us...
calimary
(84,607 posts)One of my all time favorite movies.
Sensationalizing news,is what they do, its all about profit, money.
generalbetrayus
(667 posts)"If it bleeds, it leads."
SunSeeker
(54,061 posts)ThePartyThatListens
(243 posts)You nailed it OP.
dalton99a
(84,881 posts)quakerboy
(14,197 posts)if anyone else was shot and killed in nyc in the week before or days after this killing, and if so, if the police have devoted as much time and effort into "Solving" those killings.
Mr.WeRP
(661 posts)Unhandyandy
(1 post)...to gun control.
mercuryblues
(15,261 posts)blown to pieces didn't do it, nothing will.
Karasu
(368 posts)I suppose one can hope.
Karasu
(368 posts)and transparent.
ificandream
(10,745 posts)In the case of the Thompson killing, it was the cold blooded killing on the street that pushed it up in the news judgment of editors. That and the ongoing investigation into what happened and who did it, which fosters more stories to answer those questions.
It has zero to do with "corporate media," for God's sake. People need to stop looking for motives in news coverage. It's more cut-and-dried than a lot of people think. (And yes I worked at a daily newspaper that won a Pulitzer for over 35 years.)