Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe seven myths of mass murder
By J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D.
For the past 15 years my colleagues and I have conducted research on mass murder, the intentional killing of three or more individuals, excluding the perpetrator, during one event. Recent cases of mass murder have pointed to misconceptions about this rare and frightening act, and I would like to shed some light on what I consider the seven myths of mass murder.
Myth 1: They snap.
Immediately following a mass murder, there is a steady stream of newspaper headlines and what I call entertainment profilers on television who proclaim that the individual snapped. There is no psychological term called snapping, but many assume that mass murder is done impulsively, with great emotion, and without planning or preparation. Almost all mass murders dont fit this profile.
Research consistently shows that mass murderers research, plan, and prepare for their act of violence for days, weeks, and even months. The fantasy may have incubated in their minds for years, even though the time, place, and target had yet to be determined. The act usually occurs after a major loss in love or work, and this may start the clock wherein final detailed preparation begins. I have forensically evaluated a number of mass murderers in prison or forensic hospitals, and with few exceptions, there was no evidence of a high state of emotional arousal when the killings occurred. Witnesses who have survived mass murders invariably describe the shooter as cool, calm, and deliberate a lack of emotion that is a corollary of planned violence.
This is a very interesting read. Full article here: [link:http://blog.oup.com/2012/09/seven-myths-of-mass-murder/|
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The seven myths of mass murder (Original Post)
Mr. Mojo Risen
Dec 2012
OP
Bookmarking for reading tomorrow. I'm on overload today and I'm done. nt
riderinthestorm
Dec 2012
#4
steve2470
(37,457 posts)1. k&r nt
niyad
(113,364 posts)2. k and r--will read tomorrow--no way I can get through that tonight.
Mr. Mojo Risen
(104 posts)3. kick
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)4. Bookmarking for reading tomorrow. I'm on overload today and I'm done. nt
Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)5. Adding kick to rec and a quote that I find important.
Myth 7: Mass murder can be predicted and prevented
Unfortunately this will never happen given the simple fact that we cannot predict such an extremely rare event. If we attempt to do so, we will grossly over-predict its occurrence and perhaps infringe upon individual rights and freedoms. However, we can mitigate the risk of such events by paying attention to behaviors of concern. This stopped Richard Reid from bringing down an airplane over the Atlantic in December 2001, when a passenger noticed he was trying to light his sneaker with a match. It contributed to the prevention of another ideologically driven mass murder in Times Square on 1 May 2010 when two street vendors noticed a suspicious van parked on a busy corner and alerted the police; two days later Faisal Shahzad was arrested as he sat on a plane at Kennedy bound for Dubai. Such situational awareness is critical to interdict someone in the final stages of an attack.
But there is another warning behavior that is quite frequent: mass murderers will leak their intent to others a phrase expressed to another, or posted on the internet, that raises concern. It may be overt: Im going to kill my supervisor and his cohorts tomorrow; or it may be covert: dont come to work tomorrow, but watch the news. The logical reaction should be to alert someone in a position of authority; however, most people dont. It surfaces after the event, with the rationale, I just didnt think he was serious. Trust your emotional reactions of anxiety, wariness, or fear, and let law enforcement investigate. (emphasis added)
Unfortunately this will never happen given the simple fact that we cannot predict such an extremely rare event. If we attempt to do so, we will grossly over-predict its occurrence and perhaps infringe upon individual rights and freedoms. However, we can mitigate the risk of such events by paying attention to behaviors of concern. This stopped Richard Reid from bringing down an airplane over the Atlantic in December 2001, when a passenger noticed he was trying to light his sneaker with a match. It contributed to the prevention of another ideologically driven mass murder in Times Square on 1 May 2010 when two street vendors noticed a suspicious van parked on a busy corner and alerted the police; two days later Faisal Shahzad was arrested as he sat on a plane at Kennedy bound for Dubai. Such situational awareness is critical to interdict someone in the final stages of an attack.
But there is another warning behavior that is quite frequent: mass murderers will leak their intent to others a phrase expressed to another, or posted on the internet, that raises concern. It may be overt: Im going to kill my supervisor and his cohorts tomorrow; or it may be covert: dont come to work tomorrow, but watch the news. The logical reaction should be to alert someone in a position of authority; however, most people dont. It surfaces after the event, with the rationale, I just didnt think he was serious. Trust your emotional reactions of anxiety, wariness, or fear, and let law enforcement investigate. (emphasis added)
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)7. That is a great article. n/t
Cerridwen
(13,258 posts)6. Another kick. n/t