Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:28 PM Jan 2012

The righteous indignation works for Newt.

He's indignant that someone would question him on his philandering ways. It's the media's fault that he is a lying, cheating asshole.

He's indignant that we don't fire the school janitors and put poor children to work in their place. They need to be taught the work ethic like Newt had when he was a child.

He's indignant that someone would question his work with Fannie and Freddie. He gets angry if you ask him about his $500,000 line of credit with a jewelry company.

Newt is an angry man. He is a victim. His supporters cheer him on when he attacks those that question his motives and he is energized by their applause.

How long before it stops working for him?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The righteous indignation works for Newt. (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2012 OP
He's a good actor. romney's not. Lots of Americans like the good actors. mucifer Jan 2012 #1
Victim indeed. madamesilverspurs Jan 2012 #2
Righteous indignation hangs from every politicians' tool belt. Thaddeus Kosciuszko Jan 2012 #3
South Carolina is, with the exception of perhaps Oklahoma alcibiades_mystery Jan 2012 #4
What about the anti-Jobs prez. Obama? DU2012 Jan 2012 #5
What about him? kentuck Jan 2012 #6
Yes, he plays the victim/blame card very well. DCBob Jan 2012 #7
 
3. Righteous indignation hangs from every politicians' tool belt.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jan 2012

However, some are better at wielding it than others.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
4. South Carolina is, with the exception of perhaps Oklahoma
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:46 PM
Jan 2012

The most rabidly conservative state in the union. It is practically composed of Angry White People who eat this kind of indignation for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and for beer munchies late night at the convenience store.

In this sense, Newt played it perfectly - since he knew exactly what kind of mental derangement occupied the majority of the GOP voters. If he could switch gears, one might even expect him to be dangerous. Fortunately, this is Newt's only speed. He's a one-trick pony, playing the Angry White Guy card, and only that card. He doesn't know any other songs.

Anyone taking an objective look at South Carolina should have predicted a Gingrich win weeks ago, regardless of the then current numbers. The state was practically made for his proto-fascist nationalist/Populist schtick, and everyone in politics knows it. Can he play that game in Illinois? In New York? In California? In friggin' Missouri fer chrissakes?

I don't think so. We'll see how he does in Florida, but I think it would be very easy to over-estimate Gingrich's appeal based on the SC example. South Carolina is almost perfectly suited to the kind of retrograde racist nonsense Gingrich was spinning, so it doesn't really function as a bellwether for me yet.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
7. Yes, he plays the victim/blame card very well.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jan 2012

and the ignorant masses eat it up. This why he is a dangerous opponent. He can turn negatives into positives, flaws into assets, wrongs into rights. I prefer Romney who is boring, weak and predictable.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The righteous indignation...