General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo if a child throws a stone at your child , the teacher should not take the stone away,
just give all the students stones.
yea or nay?
nerf rocks?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)The answer would be to have those overseeing the children armed with guns.
More guns, more guns, more guns, more guns ...
Sorry I was channeling the gun nuts for a moment. I hate when that happens. All I can do is suggest more guns for every situation.
in all seriousness ... the NRA/ gun nuts really and truly can't see the how irrational their responses are. It is frightening.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)Obviously you take the stone away from the offending kid.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)many purposes, and killing people is probably one of their LEAST frequent uses. And this is aside from the fact that stones are ubiquitous and a part of earth.
Unlike guns, whose sole purpose is to kill people.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)I see most discussions involve the stone, and rightfully so. I see almost no one willing to discuss the child. Or the parents of that child. Ultimately, the problem is not the stone.
I apologize that I used your thread to say this, because it is tangential to what you asked.
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)long term solution. One side ignores that as steadfastly as the others insist on 'more rocks'. Neither position solves the problem, just postpones it
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Under the Zero Tolerance mantra, the child attacked is considered just as guilty as the attacker.
They tried that on one of my daughters based on an off campus event. The school lost and some involved lost a fair amount of respect for it.