Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:11 PM Jan 2012

Is there a perfect 3rd Party?

Article by Chris Hedges...and others that have similar thoughts, and talk about voting for a third party. Obama isn't delivering everything they wanted.

So for the sake of trying to understand this thought process...is there a party that if elected WILL deliver everything a progressive liberal wants?

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
1. No. It's a creation of fantasy.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:13 PM
Jan 2012

As long as a candidate isn't actually RESPONSIBLE for anything, or in any way constrained by the real world as opposed to rhetoric, it's easy to pretend that they'd be perfect.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
5. Like the polls that had the Generic Republican ahead of Obama.....
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:14 PM
Jan 2012

but the reality of Gingrich or Romney has different resuls?

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
15. Exactly. In this case it's "Generic Perfect Progressive Party."
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:35 PM
Jan 2012

Then you get into the weeds of nominating somebody like Cynthia McKinney, who's a total fucking lunatic, or people with absolutely no experience in government. Not to mention that if such people ever actually got elected, the Angry Left would throw them under the bus within seconds, since they'd promptly either compromise their ideological purity or manage to start fucking up the actual governance of the country.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
2. I think a third party would be faced with the same roadblocks, especially a third party
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:13 PM
Jan 2012

with a "liberal agenda".

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
17. I'm curious, too.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:38 PM
Jan 2012

If it's a serious effort to elect someone, anyway.

If it's just meant as a gesture, to send a message, then whatever.

 

kctim

(3,575 posts)
7. Not unless you give them a progressive/liberal House and Senate
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:41 PM
Jan 2012

and that's NOT going to happen.
So no.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
9. Unfortunately, sometimes that step lands
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:48 PM
Jan 2012

on a venomous snake and you die.

"Look carefully at your path before beginning your journey." -Mai Fadhar

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
10. Or ... maybe Chris should create 3rdPartyUnderground.com ...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:53 PM
Jan 2012

Then, all of those who want a 3rd party could find a productive use of their time.

It would give them a place to discuss and build up all of the awesome 3rd party candidates they want.

Iggo

(47,552 posts)
11. Not yet, and I'm not holding my breath.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jan 2012

Even so, the wall came down, Jordan and Israel declared peace, and we elected a black man President of the United States (and if it hadn't been him, we'd've elected the first woman Pres).

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
12. Perfection is not the point, and it's a silly bar to use.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:01 PM
Jan 2012

The point isn't that there is some perfect third party out there. The point is that the party that used to represent us, very often doesn't anymore. Most third party voters at this point are protest votes more than anything else. I made the point before that probably much of Ron Paul's surge is not made up of people who embrace libertarianism at all. They are former major party voters who are fed up with being ignored by the parties that used to represent them.

Voting third party is not the only way to send a message, but it is certainly one way. Here's another important line from the article:

"Our efforts must be directed toward acts of civil disobedience, to chipping away, through nonviolent protest at the pillars of established, corporate power."

I am guessing that many here will vote Dem, but they will invest their greatest energy, time, and financial support in Occupy, because that is where they see an effort toward real change.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
13. Of course it's a silly bar...
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:28 PM
Jan 2012

...so why is it being applied to Obama ad nauseum?

ETA...for clarification:
To request and state issues that need correcting is one thing, but to promote the desire for a party that either doesn't exist or has just as many faults with the pretence that this option will fix the original problem is exactly the silly bar you are talking about.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
14. Oh please.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:30 PM
Jan 2012

Here we go again. Perfection and ponies.

It is a sad day on DU when Democrats who are deeply offended by policies like indefinite detention, settlements for corrupt banks, increase of the surveillance state, expansion of the MIC into new countries, and Republican-style trade and budget policies are scorned as merely "demanding perfection."

Committed Democrats care about these issues and always have. It is a duty of all citizens to push our elected representatives to do better. The calls to shut up about these things grow very old and tiresome.

You have a good day, Sheepshank.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
16. When you make up complaints, spin away accomplishments, then gripe that you're not getting your way
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:37 PM
Jan 2012

Then yes, you are going to be rightfully called out for expecting perfection. Particularly when you blame the POTUS for not doing things he legally cannot do, like overriding Congress by fiat.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there a perfect 3rd Pa...