General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEliot Spitzer: President Obama Just Lost His Leverage on the Debt Ceiling
from Slate:
President Obama Just Lost His Leverage on the Debt Ceiling
By Eliot Spitzer | Posted Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, at 6:11 PM ET
Second guessing is oh so easy, and I always looked askance at those outside the negotiating room who had wisdom after the fact. But having said that
Why did the president agree to a deal without the debt ceiling being lifted? Didnt we play this script out once before? And didnt the president, since he needs to be reasonable, in the end cave to Republicans who used the debt ceiling to extract concessions that shouldnt have been granted?
This was the presidents moment of greatest leverage. The White House could have said to the House: Take us over the fiscal cliff, go ahead and have all taxes go up. You will suffer the wrath of the publicand for what? All we are demanding is that you eliminate a negotiation that will do enormous harm to the nation, a negotiation about the debt ceiling that merely authorizes us to borrow to pay for the expenditures you have voted for.
Having won the rhetorical debate about raising taxes on the wealthy, the president could have framed the debt-ceiling argument in an equally compelling way. All eyes would have been on the House of Representatives. .............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.slate.com/blogs/spitzer/2013/01/02/obama_caved_on_fiscal_cliff_negotiations_he_should_have_insisted_on_raising.html
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)talking about "leverage" rather than extortion?
still_one
(92,187 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)From the OP:
Now we will face a much tougher moment. The House will demand a series of deep entitlement cuts in return for lifting the debt ceiling, and the president will have little to offer or demand in return. It is hard to imagine that even he thinks he will get the House to raise taxes again.
So what did we get that was worth leaving the debt-ceiling issue unresolved? Very little. Thin soup at best: little revenue, no grand bargain sufficient to calm demands for deeper cuts in entitlements, and a payroll tax increase that will still lead to a net increase in taxes for the middle class.
We should savor the brief moment of perceived victory that the cliff deal has created, because there is going to be much pain in the coming weeks over the debt ceiling.
K&R
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)cheap shots degrade the person who takes them.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)He still has the bully pulpit and he's finally learning how to use it.
And he has 3 months to paint the republicans as the people who want to allow the country to weasel out of the obligations that they (republicans) contracted.
Spending cuts? The defense budget is loaded with opportunities to make some. And the public wants them to be made there.
If he plays his cards right he hasn't lost any leverage at all.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)After all, President Obama is a Constitutional scholar and probably understands the Constitution much better than most current members of Congress. If he does over ride Congress on this the TP will be very angry but Obama will be about governing unlike the crazy TP.
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)He could not do it before because he had to get re-elected
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)have to be the President creating the pressure in the next round for the debt ceiling.
Why do so many experts seem to think that Americans across the whole political spectrum will stand for cuts to Social Security and/or Medicare? Do they really expect Americans to sell out their own families, so that Republicans can make a political point about the debt ceiling?
What don't I get here? please.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Probably because they have been reading DU.
Many here think chained CPI is the perfect thing to fix Social Security, and there is not a thing wrong with means testing.
patrice
(47,992 posts)take at face value.
Sometimes people are just thinking things through, sometimes they are experimenting, and often they are messing with others.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)The House... Americans don't pay that close attention and will believe "their side" long before they will accept the truth....
PSPS
(13,594 posts)The House, which is where all spending measures must originate, has already authorized the expenditures. So, by doing so, they have already authorized increasing the debt limit.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)As long as it stuck to like an Alabama tick and scoring insisted upon to even put it on the table how much revenue can the TeaPubliKlans put up to get the cuts they want?
You have to play it hardline but if you do, I'd love to see the plan they could forward to pass the muster.
You also don't "pre-negotiate" a fucking thing. They bring the plan and we pick it apart, no voodoo mathematics.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)When it comes to money and politics, he tells the truth.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/07/09/eliot-spitzer-wall-street-libor_n_1655260.html
If he was puke or new-fashioned Dem and didn't go after the crooks on Wall Street, the press corpse would overlook his prostitute thing.
bigtree
(85,996 posts). . . what the fuck does Spitzer know? What, he's a paid media head now?
When did he ever work to manage a legislature; steer a bill? Just STFU. I'm tired of all of these whiners thinking they're soooo brilliant second-guessing this WH. Just STFU.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)exactly what will make the difference.