Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,078 posts)
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:47 PM Jan 2013

Eliot Spitzer: President Obama Just Lost His Leverage on the Debt Ceiling



from Slate:


President Obama Just Lost His Leverage on the Debt Ceiling
By Eliot Spitzer | Posted Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, at 6:11 PM ET


Second guessing is oh so easy, and I always looked askance at those outside the negotiating room who had wisdom after the fact. But having said that …

Why did the president agree to a deal without the debt ceiling being lifted? Didn’t we play this script out once before? And didn’t the president, since he needs to be reasonable, in the end cave to Republicans who used the debt ceiling to extract concessions that shouldn’t have been granted?

This was the president’s moment of greatest leverage. The White House could have said to the House: Take us over the fiscal cliff, go ahead and have all taxes go up. You will suffer the wrath of the public—and for what? All we are demanding is that you eliminate a negotiation that will do enormous harm to the nation, a negotiation about the debt ceiling that merely authorizes us to borrow to pay for the expenditures you have voted for.

Having won the rhetorical debate about raising taxes on the wealthy, the president could have framed the debt-ceiling argument in an equally compelling way. All eyes would have been on the House of Representatives. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.slate.com/blogs/spitzer/2013/01/02/obama_caved_on_fiscal_cliff_negotiations_he_should_have_insisted_on_raising.html



21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eliot Spitzer: President Obama Just Lost His Leverage on the Debt Ceiling (Original Post) marmar Jan 2013 OP
Why is a former AG ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #1
He has the same leverage he had before with the house still_one Jan 2013 #2
Obama's convictions are what, exactly? Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #3
Spitzer knows more about call girls than he does about politics. nt. OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #4
Careerwise, he really should follow his passion. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #7
Try arguing against what he says rather than attacking him personally & i might be more convinced. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #12
I keep hearing that but I don't believe it tularetom Jan 2013 #5
I am wondering if Obama's statement did not mean he will invoke the 14th Amendment to pay the bills Thinkingabout Jan 2013 #6
BINGO krawhitham Jan 2013 #15
Yep, it is all the "leverage" he needs. GoCubsGo Jan 2013 #21
Well, that IS Eliot f-ing Spitzer, but I'm still puzzled as to why he'd think it would patrice Jan 2013 #8
Why do experts think Americans will stand for cuts to Social Security and Medicare? A Simple Game Jan 2013 #11
Well, I was thinking about the real world; there's plenty of stuff here that I don't patrice Jan 2013 #16
Because they have in the past? HiPointDem Jan 2013 #13
If "Americans across the whole political spectrum" truly cared Republicans would not control Bandit Jan 2013 #18
Obama's statements of late about this indicate to me that he'll go the 14th Amendment route. PSPS Jan 2013 #9
lost? GAVE Skittles Jan 2013 #10
There is the 1:1 ratio TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #14
Why the Washington Establishment HATES Spitzer... Octafish Jan 2013 #17
brother! He's got it, he doesn't . . . bigtree Jan 2013 #19
IMO we are his leverage. In one of his speeches he told us we need to stay involved and that is jwirr Jan 2013 #20

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
3. Obama's convictions are what, exactly?
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:52 PM
Jan 2013

From the OP:

Now we will face a much tougher moment. The House will demand a series of deep entitlement cuts in return for lifting the debt ceiling, and the president will have little to offer or demand in return. It is hard to imagine that even he thinks he will get the House to raise taxes again.

So what did we get that was worth leaving the debt-ceiling issue unresolved? Very little. Thin soup at best: little revenue, no grand bargain sufficient to calm demands for deeper cuts in entitlements, and a payroll tax increase that will still lead to a net increase in taxes for the middle class.

We should savor the brief moment of perceived victory that the cliff deal has created, because there is going to be much pain in the coming weeks over the debt ceiling.


K&R

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
12. Try arguing against what he says rather than attacking him personally & i might be more convinced.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:48 AM
Jan 2013

cheap shots degrade the person who takes them.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
5. I keep hearing that but I don't believe it
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:55 PM
Jan 2013

He still has the bully pulpit and he's finally learning how to use it.

And he has 3 months to paint the republicans as the people who want to allow the country to weasel out of the obligations that they (republicans) contracted.

Spending cuts? The defense budget is loaded with opportunities to make some. And the public wants them to be made there.

If he plays his cards right he hasn't lost any leverage at all.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
6. I am wondering if Obama's statement did not mean he will invoke the 14th Amendment to pay the bills
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jan 2013

After all, President Obama is a Constitutional scholar and probably understands the Constitution much better than most current members of Congress. If he does over ride Congress on this the TP will be very angry but Obama will be about governing unlike the crazy TP.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
8. Well, that IS Eliot f-ing Spitzer, but I'm still puzzled as to why he'd think it would
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 09:00 PM
Jan 2013

have to be the President creating the pressure in the next round for the debt ceiling.

Why do so many experts seem to think that Americans across the whole political spectrum will stand for cuts to Social Security and/or Medicare? Do they really expect Americans to sell out their own families, so that Republicans can make a political point about the debt ceiling?

What don't I get here? please.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
11. Why do experts think Americans will stand for cuts to Social Security and Medicare?
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:07 AM
Jan 2013

Probably because they have been reading DU.

Many here think chained CPI is the perfect thing to fix Social Security, and there is not a thing wrong with means testing.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
16. Well, I was thinking about the real world; there's plenty of stuff here that I don't
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 03:34 AM
Jan 2013

take at face value.

Sometimes people are just thinking things through, sometimes they are experimenting, and often they are messing with others.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
18. If "Americans across the whole political spectrum" truly cared Republicans would not control
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:06 PM
Jan 2013

The House... Americans don't pay that close attention and will believe "their side" long before they will accept the truth....

PSPS

(13,594 posts)
9. Obama's statements of late about this indicate to me that he'll go the 14th Amendment route.
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 09:03 PM
Jan 2013

The House, which is where all spending measures must originate, has already authorized the expenditures. So, by doing so, they have already authorized increasing the debt limit.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
14. There is the 1:1 ratio
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:51 AM
Jan 2013

As long as it stuck to like an Alabama tick and scoring insisted upon to even put it on the table how much revenue can the TeaPubliKlans put up to get the cuts they want?

You have to play it hardline but if you do, I'd love to see the plan they could forward to pass the muster.

You also don't "pre-negotiate" a fucking thing. They bring the plan and we pick it apart, no voodoo mathematics.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
17. Why the Washington Establishment HATES Spitzer...
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:42 AM
Jan 2013

When it comes to money and politics, he tells the truth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2012/07/09/eliot-spitzer-wall-street-libor_n_1655260.html

If he was puke or new-fashioned Dem and didn't go after the crooks on Wall Street, the press corpse would overlook his prostitute thing.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
19. brother! He's got it, he doesn't . . .
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jan 2013

. . . what the fuck does Spitzer know? What, he's a paid media head now?

When did he ever work to manage a legislature; steer a bill? Just STFU. I'm tired of all of these whiners thinking they're soooo brilliant second-guessing this WH. Just STFU.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
20. IMO we are his leverage. In one of his speeches he told us we need to stay involved and that is
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jan 2013

exactly what will make the difference.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eliot Spitzer: President ...