Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 11:32 AM Jan 2013

Health Care and Profits, a Poor Mix

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/business/health-care-and-pursuit-of-profit-make-a-poor-mix.html?_r=0


Thirty years ago, Bonnie Svarstad and Chester Bond of the School of Pharmacy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison discovered an interesting pattern in the use of sedatives at nursing homes in the south of the state. Patients entering church-affiliated nonprofit homes were prescribed drugs roughly as often as those entering profit-making “proprietary” institutions. But patients in proprietary homes received, on average, more than four times the dose of patients at nonprofits.

Writing about his colleagues’ research in his 1988 book “The Nonprofit Economy,” the economist Burton Weisbrod provided a straightforward explanation: “differences in the pursuit of profit.” Sedatives are cheap, Mr. Weisbrod noted. “Less expensive than, say, giving special attention to more active patients who need to be kept busy.”

...

A shareholder might even applaud the creativity with which profit-seeking institutions go about seeking profit. But the consequences of this pursuit might not be so great for other stakeholders in the system — patients, for instance. One study found that patients’ mortality rates spiked when nonprofit hospitals switched to become profit-making, and their staff levels declined.

These profit-maximizing tactics point to a troubling conflict of interest that goes beyond the private delivery of health care. They raise a broader, more important question: How much should we rely on the private sector to satisfy broad social needs? From health to pensions to education, the United States relies on private enterprise more than pretty much every other advanced, industrial nation to provide essential social services. The government pays Medicare Advantage plans to deliver health care to aging Americans. It provides a tax break to encourage employers to cover workers under 65.




The article makes the case that privatizing social services results in lower quality, less equitable distribution and higher costs. Who's surprised?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Health Care and Profits, a Poor Mix (Original Post) Scuba Jan 2013 OP
I would think anyone who has worked in the private sector would not be suprised. LisaLynne Jan 2013 #1
DURec leftstreet Jan 2013 #2
Profit from the illness of others is vulturism. Waiting For Everyman Jan 2013 #3

LisaLynne

(14,554 posts)
1. I would think anyone who has worked in the private sector would not be suprised.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 11:35 AM
Jan 2013

I always wonder how people who have had jobs in private industry can think that the private sector is somehow less wasteful. Well, maybe they find ways to more fully screw their workforce.

And ultimately, I think anytime pure profit -- just the pure pursuit of making money, is the goal of any organization, bad things happen.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
3. Profit from the illness of others is vulturism.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 12:34 PM
Jan 2013

Too many doctors now do no belong in the medical field at all, but go into it strictly for the overblown money to be made in it, which makes their advice completely untrustworthy. It's a train wreck, on a par with the banking industry.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Care and Profits, ...