Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The speech STARTED with two big lies (Original Post) Bonobo Jan 2012 OP
That's classified information. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #1
Actually, more like false information, since he never said either of those things. TheWraith Jan 2012 #53
It is what it is and it's done. Did not detract from anything else he said. Why rehash bushitler? lonestarnot Jan 2012 #2
Now that we are basically out of there..... FrenchieCat Jan 2012 #3
Continuing the lie is NOT acceptable. Bonobo Jan 2012 #4
+1 Scuba Jan 2012 #12
No it isn't, and should be acceptable... because it sets up a precedent fascisthunter Jan 2012 #24
hmph chervilant Jan 2012 #65
Why do you hate America? guitar man Jan 2012 #5
I questioned that as well. grasswire Jan 2012 #6
Remember, it's not a lie if you believe it. limpyhobbler Jan 2012 #7
George Costanza for president! Initech Jan 2012 #8
Serenity now!!! Serenity now!!! FLyellowdog Jan 2012 #9
100% accurate. donheld Jan 2012 #10
Except ProSense Jan 2012 #11
Damn you and your facts ProSense!!1! JNelson6563 Jan 2012 #13
Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme. Logical Jan 2012 #29
Actually, ProSense Jan 2012 #32
I would never trust your "analysis" of anything Obama said. Nothing against you but too biased. Logical Jan 2012 #33
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #35
Your opinion of course is not the truth. But I think you know that already! n-t Logical Jan 2012 #36
The heroes the President mentioned were the troops who were sent to Iraq. sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #59
And why are people who sign up for the military automatically heroes? Arugula Latte Jan 2012 #62
Wait, you bolded the exact point if the OP! How did Obama not say that? Logical Jan 2012 #14
Damn you and you logic, Logical!!!!! Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #17
"this generation of heroes" was what he said hfojvt Jan 2012 #50
While I don't often agree with what you say Bohunk68 Jan 2012 #16
How did the troops in Iraq make this country safer and more respected? sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #60
That's exactly the point. Bohunk68 Jan 2012 #68
Well, I do understand it, Bohunk. I also understand that no president can sabrina 1 Jan 2012 #69
And how exactly is that different in a meaningful way? Bonobo Jan 2012 #19
Because he said the _ending_ of the war made us safer, not the war. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2012 #23
Ridiculous. nt Bonobo Jan 2012 #25
Did it realy make us safer? MinervaX Jan 2012 #26
How many more would be created by continuing the war? (nt) jeff47 Jan 2012 #28
How is the original text essentially different from the Campbell's condensed version? leveymg Jan 2012 #22
Bigger lie "The Taliban’s momentum has been broken" FarCenter Jan 2012 #40
"safer and more respected" progressoid Jan 2012 #52
Agreed. mmonk Jan 2012 #15
USA! USA! Mission Accomplished! Did we find the Ho Chi Minh Trail? Are the Sioux on the run? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2012 #18
LOL mmonk Jan 2012 #20
By the same reasoning, wouldn't another couple wars make us even more "secure" and "respected"? leveymg Jan 2012 #21
I feel Obama is wrong bigwillq Jan 2012 #27
You are correct, Bonobo. hifiguy Jan 2012 #30
Discuss? No DeathToTheOil Jan 2012 #31
the desperation grows as it becomes clear he will be in office for 4 more years. dionysus Jan 2012 #34
So does his pandering to the Right-wing - "Mission Accomplished," in other words leveymg Jan 2012 #37
The Cult of Hero Worship for the military is a permanent part of American politics DefenseLawyer Jan 2012 #38
What, you mean there aren't enough anti-war voters to elect him? redqueen Jan 2012 #41
I have no idea what your point is here. DefenseLawyer Jan 2012 #44
I meant that you're right. redqueen Jan 2012 #45
Well said Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #55
OP manufactures a lie about things not said. madamesilverspurs Jan 2012 #39
No, it didn't... SidDithers Jan 2012 #42
Bingo. n/t wakemewhenitsover Jan 2012 #43
The SOTU had some good stuff last night, bvar22 Jan 2012 #46
I don't come around here much anymore. When I pop in and read arguments like this tranche Jan 2012 #47
your listening skills are lacking Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #48
Good catch n/t librechik Jan 2012 #49
But Obama did NOT say "the ending". moodforaday Jan 2012 #56
I was sitting in a group of people for this speech, woo me with science Jan 2012 #51
And that very spin may actually weaken our safety... countryjake Jan 2012 #54
And both lies got standing ovations Toucano Jan 2012 #57
And, continued that way. K&R (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #58
The US proudly remains number one in all things military. sad sally Jan 2012 #61
It's a rhetorical trick rudycantfail Jan 2012 #63
Good analysis. nt Bonobo Jan 2012 #66
Who won the Iraq war anyway? Prometheus Bound Jan 2012 #64
Well... chervilant Jan 2012 #67

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
53. Actually, more like false information, since he never said either of those things.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 04:44 PM
Jan 2012

What he said was that:

1. The Iraq War is over.

2. The US is now more secure and more respected around the world than it used to be.

He in no way implied that number two was BECAUSE of the Iraq War. You could more easily read it that he was saying it was because the war was OVER and US troops are out of Iraq. b

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
2. It is what it is and it's done. Did not detract from anything else he said. Why rehash bushitler?
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:38 PM
Jan 2012

He's dead to me.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
3. Now that we are basically out of there.....
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:40 PM
Jan 2012

we are more secure and respected......

That's the part Pres. Obama had something to do with,
and recognizing the Armed Forces at the end of a war
is something smart to do.

Should he had said the Armed Forces of the United States
have made us less safe and less respected.....
Because last I look, that was what Bush did.....not so much
most of the soldiers.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
4. Continuing the lie is NOT acceptable.
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:49 PM
Jan 2012

He did not do a service to the country in any way by stating those two untruths. he could have simply not said them -he did not have to say that it made the US less respected and less safe.

Continuing the lies is consistent, however, with the idea that we should not "look back" -in other words, we really should not reconsider our actions with regards to the illegitimate and the immorality of what we did in Iraq.

Let me ask you this: If we do not look back and ask those tough questions while it is happening OR after it is over, when will we do so?

And if we NEVER consider our actions, how will there ever be any progress made?

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
24. No it isn't, and should be acceptable... because it sets up a precedent
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:19 AM
Jan 2012

that war is somehow an answer... it isn't. It has just about bankrupted our nation.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
65. hmph
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 12:18 AM
Jan 2012

If we are to continue our grand experiment in democracy, we must hone and USE our critical thinking skills. We must discern when we are hearing propaganda, and when we are hearing outright lies. We must refuse to play sycophant to those we entrust with leadership roles.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
6. I questioned that as well.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:02 AM
Jan 2012

It wasn't clear to me if he meant that people of the world respect America because we stopped killing Iraqis? Or what, exactly.

I'd like to see some substance to back up those assertions.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
11. Except
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:44 AM
Jan 2012
The speech STARTED with two big lies

#1. The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation.

#2 The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world.

...that's not what he said.

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq. Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought - and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated. The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.

http://news.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/obama-i-intend-to-fight-obstruction-with-action.php

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
32. Actually,
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jan 2012

"Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme."

...no I'm not.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002218581

Can someone point the quote that states: "The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation" or "The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world."

This is inaccurate paraphrasing. Ironic that it's being used to claim a lie was told.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
33. I would never trust your "analysis" of anything Obama said. Nothing against you but too biased.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:22 PM
Jan 2012

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
35. Well,
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:31 PM
Jan 2012

I'm not a fan of paraphrasing that distorts.

If that's your thing, I'm not the person you should agree with.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
59. The heroes the President mentioned were the troops who were sent to Iraq.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:36 PM
Jan 2012

How did sending them to Iraq make America safer and more respected?

Or are you saying he's talking about some other troops who returned from somewhere else?

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
62. And why are people who sign up for the military automatically heroes?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:42 PM
Jan 2012

It would be more heroic if they refrained from aiding the military-industrial shakedown and bombing of brown people for no good reason.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
50. "this generation of heroes" was what he said
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 04:15 PM
Jan 2012

not "the Iraq war"

The first is more open ended than the second, and it is about the PEOPLE, rather than a specific action.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
16. While I don't often agree with what you say
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 08:20 AM
Jan 2012

because often it is rather, shall we say, pedantic. I agree with what you are saying here because you have stated what he said IN CONTEXT. And the context of that statement is very important. He was talking about the ending has made us safer and more respected, not that the war has.

While I have disagreements with the Prez often, I will not twist what he states just to disagree. Thanks, ProSense.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
60. How did the troops in Iraq make this country safer and more respected?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:38 PM
Jan 2012

I read the statement and that is what the president said. We are 'safer' and 'more respected' because of the troops who were in Iraq. The exact opposite is true, actually.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
68. That's exactly the point.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:09 AM
Jan 2012

It's exactly the withdrawal that makes us safer and more respected. Sabrina, of all people, I would expect that you would understand that. You surprise me. BTW, I almost always agree with you and like very much what you say and look forward to your entries. Maybe I was unclear in what I said. I don't think we are in disagreement on this.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
69. Well, I do understand it, Bohunk. I also understand that no president can
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 03:12 PM
Jan 2012

come out and say that the war was a waste of lives and money. But the statement was open to interpretation and probably on purpose, so many people heard 'the war in Iraq has made us safer'.

I long for the day when a president can just speak the truth instead of having to gloss over major crimes committed by those in office.

That he, who opposed the war and for all the right reasons, one main reason why I supported him, has to be careful how he talks about it now, is a sad statement on where we are.

Thank you for your kind words, and no problem re sometimes not seeing things in the same way. I think in this case it's not so much a reflection on the president that he has to be careful when he speaks about our overseas adventures, but on our whole system.

You may be right in your interpretation and I would like to think that he was making a statement as subtly as he could. Still, none of the warmongers have chastised him for speaking against the war, so either he fooled them completely, or they heard what some of us heard.

And I look forward to your posts also, Bohunk

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
19. And how exactly is that different in a meaningful way?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 08:51 AM
Jan 2012

Explain to me the difference. He was talking about the Iraq War. You know it and I know it.

So what knew Spin-ditry is this?

 

MinervaX

(169 posts)
26. Did it realy make us safer?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:20 AM
Jan 2012

Isn't that a question that only time will answer. How many new Bin Ladens are being born into poverty in Iraq right now and being taught about the Great Satan America. Quite a few I would imagine.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
22. How is the original text essentially different from the Campbell's condensed version?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:08 AM
Jan 2012

Looks and tastes pretty much the same to me, stripped of the niceties of applause lines, formal language, and rousing rhetoric.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
40. Bigger lie "The Taliban’s momentum has been broken"
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jan 2012

Not true.

And the blockade of supplies to the troops in Afghanistan by Pakistan continues.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
21. By the same reasoning, wouldn't another couple wars make us even more "secure" and "respected"?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:03 AM
Jan 2012

The Man shows signs of Speaking Under the Influence of Kool-Aid. I want to see him take a Breathalyzer before he's allowed back behind the wheel.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
37. So does his pandering to the Right-wing - "Mission Accomplished," in other words
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:43 PM
Jan 2012

It's a good thing to honor and help the returning troops, its quite another thing to proclaim, in so many words, "Mission Accomplished."

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
38. The Cult of Hero Worship for the military is a permanent part of American politics
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jan 2012

Everyone in the military is a "hero", regardless of what they do. Anyone who doesn't support the military 100% (especially their unlimited budget) hates the troops and hates America. It's just good business.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
41. What, you mean there aren't enough anti-war voters to elect him?
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:52 PM
Jan 2012

Well color me shocked.



I swear I never stop being surprised at how many people seem not to have the first clue about how politics actually works.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
44. I have no idea what your point is here.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:05 PM
Jan 2012

I'm merely pointing out the reality of the American culture, not suggesting that the President is making a mistake politically by jumping on that train. He is most certainly a politician and a very good one. Of course he's going to pander to the "hero" meme, even if it means saying something ridiculous like "our heros in Iraq made us safer and more respected".

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
45. I meant that you're right.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:15 PM
Jan 2012

We (the royal we, USicans, not you and I) fairly worship the military. Fail to pay sufficient homage to the military, and you will not be elected. It really is as simple as that.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
55. Well said
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jan 2012

"cult of hero worship for the military"

This is also perpetuated by the media day after day. It's sickening.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
46. The SOTU had some good stuff last night,
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:18 PM
Jan 2012

but starting with the Failed Nightmare in Iraq,
and ending with the flag wrapping WAR/Killing glorification turned my stomach.
The only thing missing was the band playing Ride of the Valkyries.



I had some hopes that this President would lead us to Peace,
and was Praying for a
"now that we have gotten Bin Laden, it is time to bang the swords into plowshares" moment.

So sad.





You will know them by their WORKS.
[font size=5 color=green][center]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]

tranche

(929 posts)
47. I don't come around here much anymore. When I pop in and read arguments like this
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:21 PM
Jan 2012

I think to myself, "These people are fucking crazy."

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
48. your listening skills are lacking
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:42 PM
Jan 2012

the ENDING of the Iraq war made the USA more secure and more respected

moodforaday

(1,860 posts)
56. But Obama did NOT say "the ending".
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:48 PM
Jan 2012

He said "this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world". "This generation of heroes" (what a sick lie in itself!) refers to the troops. The troops were there to fight the war, they did not end the war. Obama is praising them - the tools of Bush's and his own murderous spree. There is nothing about ending the war in this sentence, so please do not argue that there is.

The notion of ending the Iraq war comes in the sentence that follows, but it really belongs in a separate paragraph, as it is not connected to the one we are discussing.

And then at the end he threatened a war with Iran.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
51. I was sitting in a group of people for this speech,
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 04:17 PM
Jan 2012

and when he said those things, there was spontaneous groaning and scoffing.

There was spontaneous applause at the "less teaching to the test" line.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
54. And that very spin may actually weaken our safety...
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 04:47 PM
Jan 2012

and it certainly does little to build any admiration for a military that has continually been held unaccountable for any of the atrocities committed during the past decade.

Al Qaeda's presence in Iraq appears to be growing, as bombings, mass killings, and terror against minorities has steadily increased since the USA officially "ended" that occupation. The weakness of any functioning leadership in a nation that our government effectively destroyed, all of the "instability" that is being reported since our pullout and the total havoc that is apparent in most of our daily evening news coming from Iraq, makes what the prez said about no more Americans fighting there seem like a cruel joke...a "wink, wink" to the rest of world. His remarks on safety and respect may seem like a slap in the face to any Iraqis who just might view our troops more as criminals rather than any generation of heroes.

I cry for Haditha and only hope that the SOTU was not available there.


Toucano

(11,583 posts)
57. And both lies got standing ovations
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jan 2012

Which made the whole event look like a picnic at the mental ward.

Washington is completely detached from reality.

sad sally

(2,627 posts)
61. The US proudly remains number one in all things military.
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:40 PM
Jan 2012

As this "great" nation falls farther behind other nations in education, energy, infrastructure, health, life expectancy, infant mortality, poverty, retirement security, and happiness, we proudly remain number one in all things military.

What a hokus-pokus math claim when he said the military would be cutting half a trillion dollars from the military, but forgot to mention this was over 10 years, which is $50 billion a year from a total budget of over a trillion a year.

 

rudycantfail

(300 posts)
63. It's a rhetorical trick
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 12:13 AM
Jan 2012

that's designed to appeal to two groups: First, the neocons because it bolsters their false claims that these wars are keeping us safe and second, the great middle of America that wants to feel good and hopeful about something and generally supports the U.S. military. At the same time it discourages criticism from the left by hiding failed and harmful policies behind the troops.

It's a close cousin to 2003's SUPPORT OUR TROOPS.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
67. Well...
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 12:27 AM
Jan 2012

If, by win, you mean 'who made the most money,' I'd have to say Dick Cheney, Halliburton and Blackwater.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The speech STARTED with t...