Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts) Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:25 PM Jan 2013

Teahadists & Guns: Fact vs Fantasy

https://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?fbid=496739233711943&set=a.362561537129714.96045.360781383974396&type=1&theater

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Teahadists & Guns: Fact vs Fantasy (Original Post) WhoIsNumberNone Jan 2013 OP

Teahadists. LOL rightsideout Jan 2013 #1

LOL! Exactly. nt onehandle Jan 2013 #2

Is this implying that a massive government use of force to disarm people Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2013 #3

rightsideout

(978 posts)

1. Teahadists. LOL

Reply to WhoIsNumberNone (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 08:41 PM

Jan 2013

onehandle

(51,122 posts)

2. LOL! Exactly. nt

Reply to WhoIsNumberNone (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 11:06 PM

Jan 2013

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

3. Is this implying that a massive government use of force to disarm people

Reply to WhoIsNumberNone (Original post)

Fri Jan 11, 2013, 11:35 PM

Jan 2013

is a good thing?

When did war and government intrusion suddenly become cool? Once upon a time DU was filled with self-proclaimed civil libertarians who thought the mere idea of computers scanning civilian phone networks for certain watch words was too much of a violation of our rights as citizens. Now we're supposed to yuck it up over the idea of the government killing people. Not wiretaps; killing.

Which, by the way, feeds into the complaints of those who think liberals will use violence to take away their rights.

"...when the government comes to their home to take their guns."

That's not funny; that's depraved.

Reply to this discussion