Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:00 PM Jan 2013

*Warning Graphic* Poachers hack apart 2-month-old rhino with axes and machetes

By Agence France-Presse
Friday, January 11, 2013 12:34 EST

A two-month old rhino was hacked at least 18 times with axes and machetes when she got too close to poachers cutting off her slain mother’s horn in South Africa, a conservation NGO said Friday.

“The poor baby had obviously tried to return to its mother while the poachers were removing her horn and they slashed at her face with a panga and an axe repeatedly in order to chase her away,” said Karen Trendler of the Endangered Wildlife Trust.

The baby rhino had “18 very deep lacerations across her face, one which cuts right through her stump and the other through her skull,” but was said to be “doing remarkably well”.

Poachers slaughtered a record 668 rhinos in South Africa last year as demand on the Asian black market for their horns continued to surge.

Some think the material, which is of the same material as human nails, has medicinal values.
Those claims have been widely discredited.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/11/poachers-hack-apart-2-month-old-rhino-with-axe-and-machetes/

People are sick.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
*Warning Graphic* Poachers hack apart 2-month-old rhino with axes and machetes (Original Post) OhioChick Jan 2013 OP
Goddamn, that is just SICK..... AverageJoe90 Jan 2013 #1
Well, they didn't hack her *apart*. Brickbat Jan 2013 #2
won't click the link but kick and rec for poor baby Rhino and mom Liberal_in_LA Jan 2013 #3
No graphic pictures OhioChick Jan 2013 #4
ok. thanks for posting article Liberal_in_LA Jan 2013 #7
Horrible story, but I don't understand the "Graphic" warning in the OP A HERETIC I AM Jan 2013 #5
See post #4 OhioChick Jan 2013 #6
Well, fair enough. A HERETIC I AM Jan 2013 #8

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
2. Well, they didn't hack her *apart*.
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:11 PM
Jan 2013

What a day that will be when we eliminate destructive superstition in all its forms.

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
4. No graphic pictures
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jan 2013

I just put "graphic" in the title as reading this gruesome article may bother some.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,368 posts)
5. Horrible story, but I don't understand the "Graphic" warning in the OP
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:19 PM
Jan 2013

I would think that if you put a warning such as that in your title, there would be pictures, either in the post or in the linked story.

There were neither, not that I was hoping there were.

The word "Graphic" has a meaning;

1.
a. Of or relating to written representation.
b. Of or relating to pictorial representation.
2. Of, relating to, or represented by or as if by a graph.
3.
a. Described in vivid detail.
b. Clearly outlined or set forth.


I wouldn't call the description "Vivid detail"

The reason I bring this up is because it is all too prevalent on DU these days, as if we aren't adults and everyone's tender sensibilities need to be protected.

Life is often ugly, but that doesn't mean simple words describing such ugliness need a warning.

OhioChick

(23,218 posts)
6. See post #4
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 05:25 PM
Jan 2013

I had received a complaint in the past for posting an article about animal cruelty that involved no pictures and was told by this particular member to include a "graphic warning" in the title in the future.

I do agree with you ~ "Life is often ugly, but that doesn't mean simple words describing such ugliness need a warning."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»*Warning Graphic* Poacher...