General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Schumer's Hagel endorsement matters
Posted with permission.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/15/16528489-why-schumers-hagel-endorsement-matters?lite
Why Schumer's Hagel endorsement matters
By Steve Benen
-
Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:30 PM EST
Chris Cillizza made the case yesterday that Chuck Hagel's meeting with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) amounted to a "make-or-break moment for the Nebraska Republican's chances at leading the Pentagon in President Obama's second term." Cillizza added, "{M}ake no mistake: Chuck Schumer is the decider on the fate of Chuck Hagel's nomination."
Politico added, "As Chuck Schumer goes, so goes Chuck Hagel."
Reasonable people can argue about how much of this was Kabuki theater and how much was sincere, but either way, it would appear Hagel's nomination is in very good shape as of this afternoon.
"Based on several key assurances provided by Senator Hagel, I am currently prepared to vote for his confirmation," Schumer said in a statement. "I encourage my Senate colleagues who have shared my previous concerns to also support him." [...]
With Schumer's support, Hagel is seen as a likely shoo-in to win confirmation.
And what about Hagel's views on social issues, which Rachel explored in detail last week? There's news on that front, too.
In fact, Hagel alleviated concerns raised by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), enough to earn her support.
After being queried by Boxer -- a staunch advocate of abortion rights -- Hagel said in the letter he would ensure female service members are given the same reproductive rights as civilians.
Boxer, who had withheld her support, said Monday night she now backs the nominee after her extensive phone conversations and his detailed letter.
Barring a Republican filibuster -- in fact, even if there is a Republican filibuster -- it appears Hagel's odds of confirmation are excellent.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I understand why lack of support from Schumer would be a problem, but that was never a real scenario, I don't believe. And as far as the Republican opposition, it seems to me that is mainly Lyndsay Graham (what's his problem?) and John McCain (we know what his problem is.)
I am not convinced it is a widespread thing in the Republican Senate.
And why should anybody give a shit about McCain's opinion abut a nomination. That man had exactly one opportunity to make a meaningful nomination in his entire life, and he chose Sarah Palin.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)The MIC will stoop to anything to divide and conquer us while the contractors make money off more wars. Obama will get it done. Bringing the troops home to help with Sandy relief and the rest of it.