Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:15 AM Jan 2013

The Air Force Will Triple Its US Bomber Airspace To Perform More Low Level Runs

http://www.businessinsider.com/air-force-tripling-bomber-training-airspace-david-cencioti-the-aviationist-2013-1



According to the Associated Press, the U.S. Air Force has launched a six-year plan to more than triple the airspace used for its bombers to accommodate more training sorties of its Dakotas-based B-1 and B-52 planes.

A final environmental impact review is being finalized but talks with American Indian tribes (and the Federal Aviation Administration) have already begun.

The purpose of such discussion is to reach an agreement that “would legally bind the Air Force with commitments to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse effects to historic properties.”

The current training area, dubbed the Powder River Training Complex, is centered few miles to the northwest of where South Dakota, Wyoming and Montana meet.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/air-force-tripling-bomber-training-airspace-david-cencioti-the-aviationist-2013-1#ixzz2IKROnpgO
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Air Force Will Triple Its US Bomber Airspace To Perform More Low Level Runs (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2013 OP
Wonder how much fuel it takes to keep one of these in the air for an hour? dixiegrrrrl Jan 2013 #1
so wasteful, so disgusting NoMoreWarNow Jan 2013 #2
When was the last time the Air Force actually used a low level run in combat? Thor_MN Jan 2013 #3
Desert Storm Abnredleg Jan 2013 #4
Attention True Gun Nuts... greytdemocrat Jan 2013 #5
Used to wake up to those B-1's rumbling over my house--they are pretty damn cool. TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #6
Those B-1's are beautiful aircraft, nick of time Jan 2013 #7
I do like B-52's as well-- TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #8
Another one I thought was a pretty good looking plane nick of time Jan 2013 #9

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. Wonder how much fuel it takes to keep one of these in the air for an hour?
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 08:53 AM
Jan 2013

SO glad we can afford to burn up so much aviation fuel....

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
3. When was the last time the Air Force actually used a low level run in combat?
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:24 AM
Jan 2013

When would the Air Force ever do a actual low level run in the future?

Abnredleg

(670 posts)
4. Desert Storm
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 09:47 AM
Jan 2013

B-52s flew numerous very low level (under 500 feet) missions during Desert Storm.

Most of the operations since have been at medium levels since the US has had air supremacy and is able to operate at higher altitudes. Threat levels are always changing, however, so the military still trains at low levels.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
6. Used to wake up to those B-1's rumbling over my house--they are pretty damn cool.
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:45 AM
Jan 2013

As long as Indian tribes and ranchers agree, I don't see the problem with this. There is just not much out there--that's why Ellsworth and Minot make sense.

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
7. Those B-1's are beautiful aircraft,
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:50 AM
Jan 2013

unilike those ugly ass B-2"s.
I remember in Vietnam the B-52 arc light strikes, those were a sight to behold.

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
9. Another one I thought was a pretty good looking plane
Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jan 2013

was the FB-111 Aardvark.
The NVA called them the Whispering Death.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Air Force Will Triple...