Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 12:24 PM Jan 2012

Terror Plotter Can't Fight 'Enemy Combatant' Status

Terror Plotter Can't Fight 'Enemy Combatant' Status

(CN) - Federal authorities did not misuse the enemy combatant designation to detain an American citizen who was later convicted of a "dirty bomb" plot, the 4th Circuit ruled.

Jose Padilla was labeled an enemy combatant with close ties to al-Qaida in May 2002 when authorities picked him up at Chicago's O'Hare airport on a flight from Pakistan via Switzerland.

After several weeks of detention, authorities transferred the Brooklyn-born suspect to a Navy brig where he underwent two years of extensive interrogation without the benefit of counsel, family or friends. Padilla then spent another year and a half in federal custody as various courts weighed in on his rights.

Government officials said Padilla had been convicted of murder in the past and planned to build a dirty bomb that he would detonate in the United States. After prosecutors finally brought federal conspiracy charges in 2006, a Miami jury convicted Padilla the following year and he was sentenced to more than 17 years in prison.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/25/43339.htm

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Terror Plotter Can't Fight 'Enemy Combatant' Status (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
Picked up in 2002 and ten years later got an answer from the court Bandit Jan 2012 #1

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
1. Picked up in 2002 and ten years later got an answer from the court
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 12:46 PM
Jan 2012

Whether being named an "Enemy Combatant" was correct.. what if it had not been? The Constitution guarantees Citizens the "Right" to a Speedy Trial and a Jury of Peers.. If he was not a soldier how can a military "trial" be considered "Peers"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Terror Plotter Can't Figh...