Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(109,011 posts)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:30 PM Jan 2012

Robert Reich nails it again: Don't wish for a Newt nomination.

http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/dont_wish_for_a_newt_nomination/

Republicans are worried sick about Newt Gingrich’s ascendance, while Democrats are tickled pink.

Yet no responsible Democrat should be pleased at the prospect that Gingrich could get the GOP nomination. The future of America is too important to accept even a small risk of a Gingrich presidency.

The Republican worry is understandable. “The possibility of Newt Gingrich being our nominee against Barack Obama I think is essentially handling the election over to Obama,” says former Minnesota Governor Tom Pawlenty, a leading GOP conservative. “I think that’s shared by a lot of folks in the Republican party.”


SNIP

Even if the odds that Gingrich as GOP presidential candidate would win the general election are 10 percent, that’s too much of a risk to the nation. No responsible American should accept a 10 percent risk of a President Gingrich.

I’d take a 49 percent odds of a Mitt Romney win – who in my view would make a terrible president – over a 10 percent possibility that Newt Gingrich would become the next president – who would be an unmitigated disaster for America and the world.
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Reich nails it again: Don't wish for a Newt nomination. (Original Post) pnwmom Jan 2012 OP
Reich is wrong. TheWraith Jan 2012 #1
Classic example of be careful what you wish for RZM Jan 2012 #4
Senate and House Republicans are afraid of a bloodbath if Newt is at the top of the ticket emulatorloo Jan 2012 #6
They should be. They already have serious problems... TheWraith Jan 2012 #40
I believe we are witnessing a GOP death march. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #27
Correct. It's more like a 49% chance nothing changes, 10% chance everything changes. joshcryer Jan 2012 #31
I really wonder where people like Reich and socalled Liberals stand. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #33
I don't WilliamPitt Jan 2012 #2
Yes -- let him stay in till the bitter end, softening Romney up for the kill. nt pnwmom Jan 2012 #10
Oh yes but a a landslide win would sweet! Glimmer of Hope Jan 2012 #13
Yeah it will really dampen enthusiasm for the GOP to stay divided. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #26
Just another thing he is wrong about! n-t Logical Jan 2012 #3
Wrong DonCoquixote Jan 2012 #5
Is anyone seriously thinking that? Ebadlun Jan 2012 #14
I seriously think that. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #32
all of my family except one are democrats newspeak Jan 2012 #42
I know this, a newt win or very close second, burns the GOP for their undying support of Citizens deacon Jan 2012 #7
I DO wish for a Gingrich nomination and here's why: jenmito Jan 2012 #8
Yes Ebadlun Jan 2012 #16
Yup... jenmito Jan 2012 #21
To be fair he would be fairly down on the British occupation of Kenya Ebadlun Jan 2012 #23
Obama would subtly goad Noot into saying something hifiguy Jan 2012 #43
If Gingrich has a 10% chance of winning the general election, and Romney 49% ... Martin Eden Jan 2012 #9
I am concerned that The Newt would drag the campaign down into the muck. rhett o rick Jan 2012 #11
Im really torn on this issue. DCBob Jan 2012 #12
At LAST. Someone that thinks logically about this. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #30
Reich is exactly right. No one should hope for the worst candidate of either party A Simple Game Jan 2012 #15
They do own the voting machines and the media, after all. n/t Chemical Bill Jan 2012 #17
Even the odds of his actually winning the GE aside, a Gingrich nomination is a sad and scary sign. renie408 Jan 2012 #18
It is sad and scary that a significant slice of Americans is attracted to him. n/t pnwmom Jan 2012 #25
I'd rather it be Romney dansolo Jan 2012 #19
Yes. A brutalized and broken Romney, tied to the filthy rich by the Grinch. n/t pnwmom Jan 2012 #24
The GOP deserves to have Gingrinch as their nominee. baldguy Jan 2012 #20
I'm only wishing for a fight. I fully expect that Romney will be the nominee. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2012 #22
I wish people like Reich and Pelosi would shut their mouths. bluestate10 Jan 2012 #28
He's wrong. Gingrich stands no chance against Obama. Nye Bevan Jan 2012 #29
Another advantage to a vicious fight: Romney's selection of a running mate. Jim Lane Jan 2012 #34
My fear is that Gingrich is almost certifiable, and we're at real risk with his finger pnwmom Jan 2012 #37
I don't, Noot is VILE Raine Jan 2012 #35
They are both complete right wing assholes NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #36
Reich is correct. Newt is toxic. He will poison the entire process to no one's advantage Stinky The Clown Jan 2012 #38
I don't think it will matter much in the end fujiyama Jan 2012 #39
Foolish response. GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #41
I keep asking myself which of those 4 contenders would be tolerable if they happened to win in Nov.. LynneSin Jan 2012 #44
He's got a point. Never underestimate the sheer power of American stupidity. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #45

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
1. Reich is wrong.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:31 PM
Jan 2012

We don't need to just win a second term for Obama. We need to crush the Republicans into dust beneath a steel boot, securing the Senate and recapturing the House. Gingrich is toxic enough to accomplish that.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
4. Classic example of be careful what you wish for
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:34 PM
Jan 2012

Is it worth the risk? And is flipping the House and Senate that much more likely with Newt at the top of the ticket? I'm not so sure.

I agree with Reich. Best not to take the chance.

emulatorloo

(44,211 posts)
6. Senate and House Republicans are afraid of a bloodbath if Newt is at the top of the ticket
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:38 PM
Jan 2012

I can't remember where I saw the report I saw, but both Republican establishment and R's up for re-election think Newt will have massive NEGATIVE COAT-TAILS.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
40. They should be. They already have serious problems...
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:58 PM
Jan 2012

The voter dissatisfaction is at levels that you usually see proceeding a wave election, and the "reelect the incumbent" numbers are about as bad as they ever get. Add to that the premise of every Republican candidate, in every district, having to take positions on the controversial shit Newt says. Either they alienate the Tea Party base, or they alienate voters who aren't insane.

Honestly, I think it's kind of absurd to work from the premise that a Romney administration wouldn't be just as bad as a Gingrich administration. Take a look at the policies that are coming out of the Republican House, and tell me that Romney would really go against his own party over any of those things. He wouldn't. He and Gingrich are peas in a pod; greedy, chameleon-like opportunists who'll do anything to advance themselves. Including getting cuddled up to the Tea Party. The only reason Romney can't do it right now is because they don't like his past, and he's too fake to be able to channel the blind hatred of Obama, brown people, and the poor like Gingrich is doing. But I see every reason to believe they would govern identically, as figureheads of the Tea Party Congress.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
31. Correct. It's more like a 49% chance nothing changes, 10% chance everything changes.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:31 PM
Jan 2012

I'll take the 10% chance that everything changes, thanks.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
33. I really wonder where people like Reich and socalled Liberals stand.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jan 2012

A Gingrich presidential run would be the best thing to happen for progressive social change since Goldwater. First, President Obama will stomp mudholes in Gingrich's ass. Second, Gingrich will bleed republican office seekers dry, leaving them as bait food for their democratic opponents. Gingrich as the republican presidential nominee will deliver the House to democrats BIG and leave the Senate in solid democrat hands.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
2. I don't
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:32 PM
Jan 2012

...but I want him to stay in as looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong as possible.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
5. Wrong
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:36 PM
Jan 2012

Mitt is more dangerous because many of the left would feel he is niot that different from Obama, and think they can let him get in to punish O and get "a real leftist" in 2016. Of course, they forget the lessons of 2000, because then they would have to admit that they made a mistake abondoning Gore.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
32. I seriously think that.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:32 PM
Jan 2012

No one in their fucking right mind would even think of slapping me. The always dis-satified Left cost Gore the 2000 Presidency, and fucked the nation in the process.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
42. all of my family except one are democrats
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:19 PM
Jan 2012

everyone of them, even though they are disappointed of some of obama's choices in cabinet and the tax cut extension, do not plan on voting for a romney as punishment. They know that the corporations and elite will still get their way and the status quo maintained under romney. It seems the only ones punished are the people from both parties.

Oh, the bush coup was not a punishment by the people-it was a coup that the supremes took part in for the elite and the corporate masters. Gore won even with Lieberman as VP!!!!

deacon

(5,967 posts)
7. I know this, a newt win or very close second, burns the GOP for their undying support of Citizens
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:39 PM
Jan 2012

United. Gooooooooooooo newt!

jenmito

(37,326 posts)
8. I DO wish for a Gingrich nomination and here's why:
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:51 PM
Jan 2012

He and his followers GREATLY underestimate Obama's ability to debate. Newt always says he'll "even let Obama bring his teleprompter." Once the debates happen, and everyone sees how cool, calm, and intelligent Obama is and looks (think Kennedy vs. Nixon) Newt and his followers will panic, since the debates are the ONLY reason they want Newt to win the nomination.

And Newt has very little support among women, Independents, and, of course, minorities. I REALLY hope he gets the nomination.

Ebadlun

(336 posts)
16. Yes
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:27 PM
Jan 2012

It's an article of faith amongst them that Obama can't function without a teleprompter. It's not grounded in evidence, it's just shit they made up and repeated so often it seemed real. I would love to see Newt call Obama a food-stamp president to his face.

jenmito

(37,326 posts)
21. Yup...
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:50 PM
Jan 2012

I'D love to see Newt call Obama a "Saul Alinski radical socialist with Kenyan anti-colonial views" to his face.

Ebadlun

(336 posts)
23. To be fair he would be fairly down on the British occupation of Kenya
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:59 PM
Jan 2012

Given we crushed his grandad's bollocks. But that's fair enough, really.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
43. Obama would subtly goad Noot into saying something
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:39 PM
Jan 2012

that would sink him forever. Gingrinch has a short fuse, no filter, and a big, big mouth. Obama would destroy him in a debate by letting Noot destroy himself.

Martin Eden

(12,880 posts)
9. If Gingrich has a 10% chance of winning the general election, and Romney 49% ...
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:00 PM
Jan 2012

... I'll risk Gingrich. Not only will Gingrich as the GOP nominee practically guarantee Obama a 2nd term, it may also hurt the R's electoral prospects in the House & Senate. This could marginalize the GOP and leave it in disarray.

Still, part of me doesn't want Gingrich to win the nomination because I hate to think that so many Americans would actually vote for such a despicable liar.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. I am concerned that The Newt would drag the campaign down into the muck.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:14 PM
Jan 2012

You dont want to wrestle pigs in the mud.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
12. Im really torn on this issue.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:22 PM
Jan 2012

I cant stand Gingrich and I do think its risky if he is the GOP nominee. I also think allowing him a high profile national stage for months running up to the election is not healthy for this country.

However, there is also the possibility that the end result could be very good for Democrats and the country. Gincrich will likley self desruct repeatedly and make the Republicans/conservatives look absurb and dangerous. Obama could win in a landslide and Demcrats could take back the House and strengthen their hold on the Senate. If that happens it mght take a long time for the GOP to recover.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
30. At LAST. Someone that thinks logically about this.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:25 PM
Jan 2012

A Gingrich presidential run will be poison for republicans. Gingrich leading the republican ticket will cause Gingrich to loose and cause republican losses all the way down the republican ticket in every state.

The people that compare Gingrich to Bush-Gore don't know what the fuck they are talking about. Bush II was a well funded candidate who almost caused heart attacks among the republican establishment when it looked like hw would not win the nomination. Bush II was the best candidate that republicans could offer and measured up well agains an ethical, but stiff Gore.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
15. Reich is exactly right. No one should hope for the worst candidate of either party
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:26 PM
Jan 2012

to get the nomination. I remember thinking Gore had the election in the bag when Bush won the Republican nomination. That didn't turn out so well, as the Republicans hope, many seem to have forgotten about those eight years.

I am old enough to remember when people would claim "my candidate is better than your candidate". Now people say mine isn't as bad as yours, and the sad part is they mean it that way. Subtle but significant difference. Myself I don't want to settle for not as bad as.

I don't know which came first, not expecting the best candidate to run so they didn't, or the best candidates not running so it was no longer expected. It's a sad that people just want "good enough to beat the other guy" instead of wanting the best. So often you only get what you ask for.

dansolo

(5,376 posts)
19. I'd rather it be Romney
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:35 PM
Jan 2012

After a long, brutal primary. This election needs to be about the economic inequality. A Romney candidacy would be a perfect storm for the Democrats. The Republican base hates him, and a lot of them won't want to vote for him. Newt will energize the base with a very nasty, scortched earth campaign. I would much rather have the poster boy of the filthy rich running against Obama.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
28. I wish people like Reich and Pelosi would shut their mouths.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:18 PM
Jan 2012

I want Gingrich to bleed Romney out as long as possible and push Romney's negatives to the ceiling.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
29. He's wrong. Gingrich stands no chance against Obama.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:24 PM
Jan 2012

Let the Republicans commit electoral suicide by nominating Gingrich, if they want to. I expect Dems like Pelosi are holding back their most damaging Gingrich stuff until if and when he wins the nomination.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
34. Another advantage to a vicious fight: Romney's selection of a running mate.
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 09:40 PM
Jan 2012

The better Newt does, the more pressure there will be on Romney to emulate McCain -- to "balance" the ticket with a far right-winger. We can't realistically hope that he'd find someone as laughable as Palin. Still, we could get some benefit if he has to run with a Santorum/Pence/Ryan/DeMint type.

As to Reich's point, I'm torn. I'm inclined to prefer the 10 percent chance of Gingrich over the 49 percent chance of Romney, partly because I think that, in practice, there wouldn't be that much difference between their actions as President.

pnwmom

(109,011 posts)
37. My fear is that Gingrich is almost certifiable, and we're at real risk with his finger
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jan 2012

on the nuclear button. He shut down our government -- by his own admission -- because he didn't like where he had to sit on Air Force 1. What would he do if he thought China had insulted him?

NNN0LHI

(67,190 posts)
36. They are both complete right wing assholes
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:05 PM
Jan 2012

Romney just hides it better. Like a chameleon. Romney is no less dangerous than Gingrich.

Don

Stinky The Clown

(67,832 posts)
38. Reich is correct. Newt is toxic. He will poison the entire process to no one's advantage
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:15 PM
Jan 2012

Some people are so destructive they should not be allowed to participate in the process. This man is one of them.

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
39. I don't think it will matter much in the end
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:34 AM
Jan 2012

Like many reelections, this is really a referendum on Obama. If the voters are ready to dump him, they'll see if Romney is an acceptable alternative. So far, Romney isn't making the sale - even with his own party.

Let the idiots throw whoever they got. Both Romney and Gingrich are a joke and neither looks competent or capable. The difference is just the margin. I see Obama taking the race slightly more narrowly with Romney at the top. Romney would likely take NH and I think he'd play stronger in NV and VA among a few other states. I can't see where Gingrich has any real strengths. The guy is just TOXIC.

Ultimately, Reich is wrong. Romney also may depress Dem leaning voters who get complacent into believing he's not that bad. Gingrich would freak every person in the center and left of center into the voting booth. He's that bad. I don't remember a time this guy was every liked and the GOP took the House in '94 in spite of him, not because of him.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
44. I keep asking myself which of those 4 contenders would be tolerable if they happened to win in Nov..
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:40 PM
Jan 2012

I can't think of one - they are all bad in their own way.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
45. He's got a point. Never underestimate the sheer power of American stupidity.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:36 PM
Jan 2012

America elected Nixon. TWICE.

America elected Reagan. TWICE.

America elected Bush 41. Thankfully only once.

America elected Dubya, TWICE (yes, I know, with asterisks. At the minimum, it shows that it was close enough to steal.)

There are millions and millions of dumbasses in America who'll vote for this doucheclown.

DO NOT ASSUME HE WILL LOSE. This election will be a fight.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich nails it aga...