Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:00 PM Jan 2013

In the first 15 seconds of his attack, he killed 12 and wounded 10.(seaside resort of Port Arthur)

Will Lessons From Down Under Stem the Undertaker Here?

In 1996, 28-year-old Martin Bryant finished his lunch in a café in the seaside resort of Port Arthur and pulled out a semi-automatic rifle. In the first 15 seconds of his attack, he killed 12 and wounded 10.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/australia-model-successful-gun-control-laws/story?id=18007055


15 SECONDS!!!!!
will you gun bunnies shut the f up about the 2nd amendment for 15 f'in seconds and imagine what being in a situation like that would be like?

what the f good would your gun do? (and don't say you could shoot him and save people. the guy that stopped Laughner had a gun and didn't use it because he was too busy tackling him while he RELOADED)

you want to be a 'hero', so just let shit like that happen?

30 round mags are no big deal?

edit: the AZ guy was helped by a 70-something year old guy who had already been shot, so there's a case for less deadly ammo.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
4. Relax already. Nobody is going to take YOUR guns away.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:13 PM
Jan 2013

But for the rest of we need to at least deal with the whitecaps in the ocean of guns this nation is swimming in.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
5. The AWB is not the answer
Reply to RC (Reply #4)
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:17 PM
Jan 2013

universal background check yes, plus all the President's EO's, but the AWB as written is pure security theater.

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
13. i doubt they are expecting the AWB to go through exactly as written...
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jan 2013

they have to negotiate with the gun lobby, unfortunately, so...

they have to start with something to give away.

you've got to admit it is better than the previous one.

or try to, at least.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
6. White caps don't drown people
Reply to RC (Reply #4)
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jan 2013

but they are eye catching and distract from the real dangers at sea.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. It is the same ones who thinks they can hold off the gubment.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:12 PM
Jan 2013

The weapons of war are designed to be used in war. Anyone who says they need large capacity weapons must really not shoot well. The crap put out by the NRA is just crap. They are in the business of selling guns and ammo. I used to have respect for the NRA but they are not interested in the hunter. If they was really interested they would push for calmess and restraint.

TheBlackAdder

(28,189 posts)
7. You would attract more people with the use of restrained swearing.
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jan 2013

I've read a few of your posts and support most of them... please just try a little restraint when using cuss words.

It doesn't really cast a good light on you or your message (which should be heard).

You will have more dramatic effect to your posts by doing so, besides this site does not restrict the full word, so there is not really a reason to use abbreviations and hyphenated/asterisked out words.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
8. Those tough Aussies bit the bullet in 1996 and enacted tough restrictions
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:29 PM
Jan 2013

That would literally make the gun culture here weep like babies.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
11. And they have not had another mass casualty gun action since. A well REGULATED militia, that I can
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:46 PM
Jan 2013

support. Lets start by limiting magazine clips and doing background checks on every gun purchase. Then lets ADD a requirement that all ammo purchased faces the same license and recording checks that sudafed does. That would be a start....

Response to farminator3000 (Original post)

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
12. my head exploded juxtaposing the words "Port Arthur" and "seaside resort..."
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 06:48 PM
Jan 2013

...until I clicked through and realized the article was about Australia. Port Arthur TEXAS is not a resort, LOL.

Port Arthur, TX:

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
14. the one in TX would be a seaside resort for this guy
Sun Jan 27, 2013, 07:06 PM
Jan 2013

quite a film-

Godzilla vs. Hedorah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Godzilla vs. Hedorah (ゴジラ対ヘドラ Gojira tai Hedora?), is a 1971 Japanese science fiction kaiju film produced by Toho. Directed by Yoshimitsu Banno and featuring special effects by Teruyoshi Nakano, the film starred Akira Yamauchi, Toshie Kimura, and Hiroyuki Kawase. The 11th film in the Godzilla series, the film had a strong anti-pollution message with director Banno being inspired after visiting a polluted beach near Yokkaichi.

Plot

The microscopic alien lifeform Hedorah feeds on Earth's pollution and grows into a poisonous, acid-secreting sea monster. After it attacks Dr. Yano and his young son Ken, scarring them both, Hedorah's toxic existence is revealed to the public. Ken has visions of Godzilla fighting the world's pollution, and insists Godzilla will come to mankind's aid against Hedorah.

Hedorah evolves into an amphibian form, allowing it to move onto land to feed on additional sources of pollution. Hedorah is confronted by Godzilla. Hedorah, only an amphibian at the time, is easily overpowered by Godzilla and retreats into the sea. He returns shortly thereafter in a flying saucer shape demonstrating new, even deadlier forms which it can switch between at will.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In the first 15 seconds o...