General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAT LAST! Paul Krugman hands Joe Scarborough et al their collective heads on Morning Joe!
Ed Rendell, Richard Haas, Joe and Mika shouldn't have even tried! Dr. Krugman just laughed at their lame arguments and said "How many times do I have to be right....?"
They were such sorry asses I couldn't believe it.
Here, for you to savor: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc_tv-morning_joe/
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)I missed him... couldn't take watching it this morning with all the right-wingers on this morning.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)That's the way you have to watch Morning Joe.
Today was pure gold! Watching Richard Haas's head explode while Paul laughed was just wonderful!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)who is Richard Haas? I must have missed the intro or something.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Here's his bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_N._Haass
Aerows
(39,961 posts)a foreign policy guru.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)But he couldn't keep up with Krugman today. He got positively waspish and all scowly. He knew that Krugman was eating his lunch and seemed helpless to push back. His last salvo to Paul: "you're right until you're not!" just made Paul laugh.
What a hoot!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)it's kind of like saying "Oh, huh!" when you run out of better responses...when you're twelve.
ETA: a "foreign policy wonk" under Bush qualifies as a credential?
JHB
(37,158 posts)...which is yet one more sign that it ain't.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)here is your ass. I'll hand it to you politely.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Probably has a trigger finger for Iran.
spedtr90
(719 posts)Krugman explained it so well, but they didn't want to hear it, not even Rendell.
If only Krugman would get the air time Paul Ryan gets....
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Mika was worthless with her comparison to climate change which Paul destroyed handily.
I read Krugman faithfully in the NYT. He is NEVER wrong. Sometimes I wish he were, but if he says it you can take it to the bank...
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)Governor Ed Rendell
Co-Chair, Campaign to Fix the Debt
Edward G. Rendell was the 45th Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Governor Rendell has also served as Mayor and District Attorney of the City of Philadelphia. From 2008 to 2009, Gov. Rendell was Chair of the National Governors Association. He served as General Chair of the Democratic National Committee during the 2000 presidential election. Gov. Rendell, along with New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, founded Building America's Future, a national infrastructure-investment coalition. Governor Rendell is a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and of the Villanova Law School and served in the United States Army.
http://www.fixthedebt.org/who-we-are
JHB
(37,158 posts)forestpath
(3,102 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)is starting to show in the daytime fare. Theyr'e deliberately easing in the stoopid as time goes on. I guess hoping to entice FOX viewers to switch channels.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)is awful. Every time I see him I cringe. And now since Krugman put them in their place; the same goes for Joe, Mika and Richard Haas.
catbyte
(34,376 posts)I know I'm probably being unfair, but he really makes my skin crawl. He was pretty awful during the Democratic primaries in 2008.
Cha
(297,180 posts)http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/not-with-a-bang-but-with-a-whimper/?smid=tw-share
It's when people are wrong and they don't own up to it.. that they lose respect.
malaise
(268,963 posts)Missed it
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)joeunderdog
(2,563 posts)Instead, he tied them in knots. You could see they were looking at each other to rescue themselves. Their discomfort was enjoyable to no end. He crushed em.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)Paul Krugman, a nobel prize winning economist, or Richard Haas, a Bush era foreign policy wonk?
Krugman won that debate hands down.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)I wonder what kind of response they'd need to make him part of the "regular" crowd?
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)even Ezra Klein has more smarts than that entire panel put together, but I notice they don't have him on anymore...
malaise
(268,963 posts)and he knows way more than any of them on the subject
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)pointed out that they didn't work. They ought to know better than get into scenarios with a guy who does econ modeling for a living.
I guess Willie Geist knew better than to be on with this guy...that little pisher...
malaise
(268,963 posts)Amazing how these non-entities pretend to know more than the genuine experts.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)I wanted to smack her! She's saying "If you don't agree with us, you're crazy..."
Right, Mika! What was your Nobel Prize for?
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:32 PM - Edit history (1)
apart with facts. Rendell always likes to act like his is the moderate, but Krugman ripped his logic too.
Dalai_1
(1,301 posts)is that PK was so far above them they could not comprehend his points! Joe had "visions of ball scores" in his head..Mika was trying to figure out how it all translated into *getting fit* ie calories or exercise ..Rendell simply looks more and more like he is from outer space and Haas is a jerk!
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)Mika and Joe can't handle the truth... their heads are too far up their butts....
Never heard of Richard Haas... but he is a Republican insider and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.. he's a Federal Reserve suck-up.. ...that explains it all.
Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)I can't watch that crap.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Ninga
(8,275 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)If this doesn't work, you just have to scroll down the video bar on the left:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc_tv-morning_joe/#50613650
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)from now on I'll just tell folks to go on msnbc.com and click on the Morning Joe tab...the Internets are HARD!
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)Krugman really kept his cool in the face of ignorance and bluster.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)folks, but since I saw it live this morning I knew that it started that way...as a matter of fact, I was surprised when Mika announced he was next guest and Paul just walked on!
doc03
(35,328 posts)function there, she just looks either dazed, confused or disgusted all the time?
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)She's just taking dumb and running with it all the way to the bank.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)does a weird drugged out kind of rocking, along with the strange deer-in-the-headlights looks (when she's not striking poses as if she thinks she's in a fashion photo-shoot)?
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)All assholes, no Krugman. Shame on you, MSNBC!
Marr
(20,317 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements. We've got to do something about entitlements.
Krugman: Please stop. It's number 5 or 6 on the list.
Tippy
(4,610 posts)I am glad Paul put them in their place I just wish he was really on Team Obama...have been telling them for years they are missing the boat by not getting Paul on board...
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)And I also think that Obama pays attention to what he says!
doc03
(35,328 posts)CTyankee
(63,911 posts)stuff that I miss there...
doc03
(35,328 posts)tosh
(4,423 posts)umm....yeah!!!
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Those grinning buffoons smacking their lips in anticipation of how the markets would react to slashing benefits to the weakest among us coupled with the inability to even slightly ponder the facts Krugman brought the table made me feel like I was watching a remedial Sean Hannity workshop.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)There is no way around that. They talk about "cutting entitlements." It sounds to hygienic, so neat, so orderly.
The NAZIs spoke of "deporting" the Jews. Killing Indians was "opening the West."
"Cutting entitlements" is a euphemism for killing seniors. That's all it is.
Young people, theoretically, can work and, among other things their rising pay will pay for rising insurance to cover healthcare costs. Older people can't get insurance. We have too many pre-existing conditions.
My neighbor who died last year was a good example of a senior with extremely high healthcare costs. He had kidney disease and was regularly picked up by ambulance and taken for dialysis. His wife, who survived him, still owns the family house and take care of small children whose mothers are working.
Were it not for Medicare, she would have lost the house and not be able now to support herself.
When they talk about "cutting entitlements" they do not think about the human repercussions of reducing Medicare funding or Social Security benefits. It is just disgusting.
The only one in the bunch who cares about people, who sees people as warm-blooded with feelings is Paul Krugman. That is why we like him.
The others all seemed to detach themselves from the suffering of mankind. They don't seem to understand the human dimension of economics.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)That is 100% unacceptable. For anyone who claims to be anything but an atheist, Ayn Rand loving libertarian.
As long as the rich friends they have keep telling them to push austerity on major media. As long as the people themselves keep supporting those rich friends with Wall St investments. As long as they keep getting richer. It will only get worse for everyone & everything else.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I've never seen one. And while I'm not Photoshop conversant, surely someone on DU must be! I'd love to see the "coffee-blotted" Morning joe logo have a K added between the O and the E. Anyone???
mt_big_blue_sky
(15 posts)I made one. How can I post it?
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Marsha honey, its just the opposite. They are using the SS trust fund as part of the general fund now because the rich dont want their taxes increased.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Besides, I was reading Paul Krugman's column in today's NYT! Heh...
blackspade
(10,056 posts)CTyankee
(63,911 posts)I noticed that no one rebutted him...prolly because they couldn't...they b.s. all the time...
think
(11,641 posts)Krugman has facts. The rest talk in circles....
vlyons
(10,252 posts)They all just completely dismissed everything that Krugman said. Richard Haas was especially disappointing. He's such a chicken little sky is falling guy.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Hey Haass, where's YOUR Nobel Prize???
0rganism
(23,944 posts)Krugman may as well have been talking to a pack of baboons. They are all so tied to their austerity talking points aimed at justifying demolishing benefits to pay for upper-income bracket tax cuts that they can't possibly comprehend that there is no pressing crisis, that their silly ideas don't do anything except promote the very recessionary economy they say they want to avoid. When they're challenged on dogma, they get downright ornery.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Investing in the people is an economic stimulus...it's also morally right not to treat people like dispensable slaves.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)That's why they speak so cruelly, so without any thought of the human catastrophe that cutting Medicare and Social Security would unleash.
benld74
(9,904 posts)(nope they are not following me there), then out of his right side(and thay sure as hell dont follow me).
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)They are BOTH conservatives - one a Dem and one a Republican, but both deficit-hawks against government spending. Erskine Bowles is a defeated political candidate. Alan Simpson is coo-coo. That is all.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:32 AM - Edit history (1)
I'll bet he agrees with Paul.
Dr. Jeffrey Sachs says the same thing Paul says, BTW. Every time he goes on MJ he says something very similar, only he is softer in his approach. I like both him and Paul...
Squinch
(50,949 posts)haven't watched for a long time. Maybe I should give her the benefit of the doubt. The expression could have been one of utter confusion. Which doesn't seem unlikely.
I often think Krugman is mentally banging his head against a wall when he talks to these morning people. Even this one, at the end, he just kept saying, "we really need job stimulus. No, first on the list should be job stimulus. But actually, job stimulus is more important." And what could be more obvious? And yet the morons kept arguing with him.
Did you see his blog after his appearance on CNBC? Maybe he'll comment on this appearance too. I'd love to hear what he was thinking.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)CTyankee
(63,911 posts)drynberg
(1,648 posts)I did grimmace when Mika brought up the "similarity" of Climate Change and Deficit Mongering, and of course, Paul rebuffed this very faulty comparison. What did haunt me about the PK clip was how poorly the others heard what PK was saying about millions of chronically unemployed Americans; do they hear and not even begin to care? Do they not even hear? And even if you don't care about these millions of Americans going through the grater of debt and loss, how about the connection of employment and economic health? God help us.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)subdued over their "schooling," which was really a "humiliation" if you ask me.
That was pitiful. They were no match for him...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Social Security. They don't care about the unemployed.
They ONLY CARE ABOUT THE MARKETS. They only care about their money.
RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)I was pleasantly surprised to see his cameo in the comedy 'Get him to the Greek'
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts). . . says "Erskine-Bowles" likes it's something we should do.
supercats
(429 posts)His main point was our priority should be on jobs, jobs, jobs, not entitlement reform because job creation is whats needed now and entitlements are 15-25 years out, so why the push for entitlement reform now??? You had Richard Haas, a complete red-ass, scared shitless, Scarborough questioning and in Haas's camp, Ed Rendell, pushing for both at the same time, which is equally ridiculous, and then there's Mika, why the hell is she even there on the show??? She is the equivalent of a parrot. She contributes absolutely nothing except eye candy, with those serious silent head moving stares of hers. She always looks like she's posing, or modeling. Get her off that show. If she is supposed to be there as the Democratic foil to Scarborough then she fails miserably day in and day out. Krugman had answers for them all. And beat each and every one of them with common sense and a smarter policy.
CTyankee
(63,911 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)If you can't make end meets, you try to get a better job.
That's how you get ahead.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)babylonsister
(171,057 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)just buried. Use the search function at the site.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)it comes right up
babylonsister
(171,057 posts)Bozita
(26,955 posts)go west young man
(4,856 posts)the climate change comparison. He must of thought to himself that she is so desperate just to add something to the conversation that she's brought up a totally irrelevant point. He handled each of them superbly. Scarborough probably won't let Paul on again as they all know they look pretty stupid when he's talking and they can't keep up. The Neocon Bush schill kept trying to belittle Paul with his"rose colored glasses and rosey scenario's" comments. An obvious smear tactic. Paul handled him well at the end.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)I really got a lot out of this dialogue with Krugman--he speaks with such clarity and brilliance. Very convincing. I don't usually recommend anything from Morning Ho but this is really good.
Thanks for posting. I would have missed it otherwise.
RedStateLib
(5 posts)Is an idiot. I expected more from Zbigniew's daughter. Is she always like that? Just posing for the cameras with that confused expression on her face?
I expected the men on the show to be dweebs, but I was really disappointed in her. Reminded me of the blonde bimbos on Faux News.
I never watch Morning Joe so I've never seen her and had to Google to find out who that was.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Meeeka's ridiculous. A real throwback to forgotten times.
They gave her the role of playing courtesan to Joe's Overlord...
Or: (insert your favorite master/slave relationship from retro movies or stories)